Anton Webern[a] (German:[ˈantoːnˈveːbɐn]ⓘ; 3 December 1883 – 15 September 1945) was an Austrian composer, conductor, and musicologist. His music was among the most radical of its milieu in its concision and use of then novel atonal and twelve-tone techniques in an increasingly rigorous manner, somewhat after the Franco-Flemish School of his studies under Guido Adler. With his mentor Arnold Schoenberg and his colleague Alban Berg, Webern was at the core of those within the broader circle of the Second Viennese School. Their atonal music brought them fame and stirred debate. Webern was arguably the first and certainly the last of the three to write music in an aphoristic, expressionist style, reflecting his instincts and the idiosyncrasy of his compositional process.
A variety of post-World War II musicians celebrated his music, much of which was first published only then or later still. Among these were many composers influenced especially by his twelve-tone music in a phenomenon known as post-Webernism, linking but not restricting Webern's legacy to serialism. Understanding of his musical semantics or semiotics, performance practice, and sociocultural contexts was widely fledgling after years of severe disruption. This was gradually improved by musicians and scholars who helped publish and record his works as well as establish his music as modernist repertoire. A Gesamtausgabe (complete edition) is pending.
Webern was born in Vienna, Austria-Hungary. He was the only surviving son of Carl von Webern, a descendent of minor nobility [de], high-ranking civil servant, mining engineer,[6] and owner of the Lamprechtsberg copper mine in the Koralpe. Much of Webern's early youth was in Graz (1890–1894) and Klagenfurt (1894–1902), though his father's work briefly took the family to Olmütz and back to Vienna.[7]
His mother Amalie (née Geer) was a pianist and accomplished singer. She taught Webern piano and sang opera with him. He received first drums, then a trumpet, and later a violin as Christmas gifts. With his sisters Rosa and Maria, Webern danced to music and ice-skated the Lendkanal [de] to the Wörthersee. Edwin Komauer taught him cello, and the family played chamber music, including that of Mozart, Schubert, and Beethoven.[8] Webern learned to play Bach's cello suites[9] and may have studied Bach's polyphony under Komauer.[10]
The extended Webern family spent summers,[c] holidays, and vacations at their country estate, the Preglhof. The children played outside in the forest and on a high meadow with pasture grazed by herded cattle and with a church-and-mountain view; they bathed in a pond (where Webern once saved Rosa from drowning). He drove horses to Bleiburg and fought a wildfire encroaching on the estate.[8] These experiences and reading Peter Rosegger's Heimatkunst [de] shaped Webern's distinct and lasting sense of Heimat.[11]
The voices proceed ... in ... equality ... . Each ... has its own development and is a ... self-contained ... structural unit ... . ... Isaac uses ... canonic devices in ... profusion ... . ... Added ... is the keenest observation of tone colourings in ... registers of the human voice. This is partly the cause of ... interlacing of voices and ... their movement by leaps.[16]
I long for an artist in music such as Segantini was in painting. ... [F]ar away from all turmoil of the world, in contemplation of the glaciers, of eternal ice and snow, of ... mountain giants. ... [A]n alpine storm, ... the radiance of the summer sun on flower-covered meadows—all these ... in the music, ... of alpine solitude. That man would ... be the Beethoven of our day.[19]
In 1904, Webern approached Hans Pfitzner for composition lessons but left angrily when Pfitzner criticized Mahler and Richard Strauss.[20] Adler admired Schoenberg's work and may have[i] sent Webern to him for composition lessons.[22] Thus Webern met Berg, another Schoenberg pupil, and Schoenberg's brother-in-law Alexander Zemlinsky, through whom Webern may have worked as an assistant coach at the Volksoper in Vienna (1906–1909).[23] Schoenberg, Berg, and Webern became devoted, lifelong friends with similar musical trajectories.[24] Adler, Heinrich Jalowetz, and Webern played Schoenberg's quartets under the composer, accompanying Marie Gutheil-Schoder in rehearsals for Op. 10.[25]
Also through Schoenberg, who painted and had a 1910 solo exhibition at Hugo Heller [de]'s bookstore, Webern met Gustav Klimt, Oskar Kokoschka, Max Oppenheimer (with whom he corresponded on ich–Du terms), Egon Schiele, and Emil Stumpp.[26] In 1920, Webern wrote Berg about the "indescribable impression" Klimt's work made on him, "that of a luminous, tender, heavenly realm".[27][j] He also met Karl Kraus, whose lyrics he later set, but only to completion in Op. 13/i.[29]
1908–1918: Early adulthood in Austria-Hungary and German Empire
Webern married Wilhelmine "Minna" Mörtl in a 1911 civil ceremony in Danzig. She had become pregnant in 1910 and feared disapproval, as they were cousins. Thus the Catholic Church only solemnized their lasting union in 1915, after three children.[30]
They met in 1902,[31] later hiking along the Kamp from Rosenburg-Mold to Allentsteig in 1905. He wooed her with John Ruskin essays (in German translation), dedicating his Langsamer Satz to her. Webern diaried about their time together "with obvious literary aspirations":
We wandered ... The forest symphony resounded. ... A walk in the moonlight on flowery meadows—Then the night—"what the night gave to me, will long make me tremble."—Two souls had wed.[k]
everyone knows ... it is always Sunday in Vienna ... one lives in a world of half-poetry which is very dangerous for the real thing. They can recognize a few waltzes by Lanner and Strauss ... a few Viennese songs ... It is a well-known fact that Vienna has the finest cakes ... and the most cheerful, friendly people. ... But those who are condemned to live here cannot understand all this.
"What benefit ... if all operettas ... were destroyed", Webern told Dietz in 1908.[39] But in 1912, he told Berg that Zeller's Vogelhändler was "quite nice" and Schoenberg that J. Strauss II's Nacht in Venedig was "such fine, delicate music. I now believe ... Strauss is a master."[40] A summer 1908 engagement with Bad Ischl's Kurorchester [de] was "hell".[39] Webern walked out on an engagement in Innsbruck (1909), writing in distress to Schoenberg:
a young good-for-nothing ... my 'superior!' ... what do I have to do with such a theatre? ... do I have to perform all this filth?[41][m]
Webern wrote Zemlinsky seeking work at the Berlin or Vienna Volksoper instead.[43][n] He started at Bad Teplitz's Civic Theater in early 1910, where the local news reported his "sensitive, devoted guidance" as conductor of Fall's Geschiedene Frau, but he quit within months due to disagreements.[45] His repertoire likely included Fall's Dollarprinzessin, Lehár's Graf von Luxemburg, O. Straus's Walzertraum, J. Strauss II's Fledermaus, and Schumann's Manfred.[46] There were only 22 musicians in the orchestra, too few to perform Puccini's operas, he noted.[46]
Webern then summered at the Preglhof, composing his Op. 7 and planning an opera.[47] In September, he attended the Munich premiere of Mahler's Symphony of a Thousand and visited with his idol,[o] who gave Webern a sketch of "Lob der Kritik".[p] Webern then worked with Jalowetz as assistant conductor in Danzig (1910–1911), where he first saw the "almost frightening" ocean.[50] He conducted von Flotow's Wintermärchen, George's Försterchristl, Jones' Geisha, Lehár's Lustige Witwe, Lortzing's Waffenschmied, Offenbach's Belle Hélène, and J. Strauss II's Zigeunerbaron.[51] He particularly enjoyed Offenbach's Contes d'Hoffmann and Rossini's Barbiere di Siviglia, but only Jalowetz was allowed to conduct this more established repertoire.[52]
Webern soon expressed homesickness to Berg; he could not bear the separation from Schoenberg and their world in Vienna.[53] He returned after resigning in spring 1911, and the three were pallbearers at Mahler's funeral in May 1911.[54] Then in summer 1911, an neighbor's antisemitic abuse and aggression caused Schoenberg to quit work, abandon Vienna, and go with his family to stay with Zemlinsky on the Starnbergersee.[55] Webern and others fundraised for Schoenberg's return, circulating more than one hundred leaflets with forty-eight signatories, including G. Adler, H. Bahr, Klimt, Kraus, and R. Strauss, among others.[56][q] But Schoenberg was resolved to move to Berlin, and not for the first or last time, convinced of Vienna's fundamental hostility.[58]
Webern soon joined him (1910–1912), finishing no new music in his devoted work on Schoenberg's behalf, which entailed many editing and writing projects.[59] He gradually became tired, unhappy, and homesick.[59] He tried to persuade Schoenberg to return home to Vienna, continuing the fundraising campaign and lobbying for a position there for Schoenberg, only for Schoenberg to decline a return to the Vienna Academy.[60] At the same time, Webern began a cycle of repeatedly quitting and being taken back by Zemlinsky at the Deutsches Landestheater Prague (1911–1918).[61] He also had a short-lived conducting post in Stettin (1912–1913).[62]
Webern had little time (mostly summers) to compose. There were conflicts at work (e.g., he emphasized a director called him a "little man"). His ambivalence toward sales-oriented popular music theater contributed ("I ... stir the sauce", he wrote).[63] "It appears ... improbable that I should remain with the theatre. It is ... terrible. ... I can hardly ... adjust to being away from home", he wrote Schoenberg in 1910.[64] Miserably ill, he sought medical advice and took rest at a sanatorium in Semmering [de].[65] In 1912–1913 he had a breakdown and saw Alfred Adler, who noted his idealism and perfectionism. Adler evaluated his symptoms as psychogenic responses to unmet expectations. Webern wrote Schoenberg that Adler's psychoanalysis was helpful and insightful.[66]
Webern's father sold the Preglhof in 1912, and Webern mourned it as a "lost paradise".[r] He revisited it and the family grave in nearby Schwabegg his entire life, associating these places with the memory of his mother, whose 1906 loss profoundly affected him.[68] In 1912, he confided in Berg and Schoenberg respectively: "my compositions ... relate to the death of my mother";[s] and
I am overwhelmed with emotion when I imagine everything ... . My daily way to the grave of my mother. The infinite mildness of the entire countryside, all the thousand things there. Now everything is over. ... If only you could ... have seen ... . The seclusion, the quiet, the house, the forests, the garden, and the cemetery. About this time, I had always composed diligently.[70]
Childhood days and childhood home! It is that old song of Paradise. There are people for whom ... Paradise is never lost ... in them God's kingdom ... rises ... more ... in ... memory than ... ever ... in reality; ... children are poets and retrace their steps.[72]
Webern frequented the surrounding Carinthian-Styrian Alps, treasuring it as time "up there, in the heights", where "one should stay". He backpacked or summited the Gaisstein, Grossglockner, Hochschober, Hochschwab, and Schneealpe (among others) throughout his life, fascinated by the alpine climate, föhn, glaciers, pines, and springs "crystal clear down to the bottom". He collected and organized "mysterious" herbs and flowers in pressed albums, later keeping cherished gardens where he made his home in the Mödling District (first in Mödling, then in Maria Enzersdorf). Webern associated nature with his personal (youthful and spiritual) experiences, forming a topical nexus that recurred in his diaries, letters, and music (explicitly in sketches and set texts).[73]
Such habits endured in Webern's life and œuvre. In 1933, Joseph Hueber recalled Webern stopped in a fragrant meadow, dug his hands into the soil, and breathed in the flowers and grass before rising to ask: "Do you sense 'Him' ... as strongly as I, 'Him, Pan'?"[74] In 1934, Webern's lyricist and collaborator Hildegard Jone described his work as "filled ... with the endless love and delicacy of the memory of ... childhood". Webern told her, "through my work, all that is past becomes like a childhood".[69]
Webern served intermittently and patriotically in World War I, moving frequently and tiring. Eventually he hoped for its end. Despite Schoenberg's and his father's advice that he not quit conducting, in 1918 Webern returned to Schoenberg in Mödling, hoping to compose more.[75] His finances were so poor that he soon explored a return to Prague,[76] but other opportunities arose.
Webern worked as director of the Wiener Schubertbund and in 1922 of the mixed-voice amateur Singverein der Sozialdemokratischen Kunstelle[w] and the Arbeiter-Sinfonie-Konzerte[x] through David Josef Bach, Director of the Sozialdemokratische Kunststelle.[80][y] In 1926, Webern resigned as chorusmaster of the Mödling Männergesangverein[z] for hiring Jewish soprano Greta Wilheim as a stand-in soloist for Schubert's cantataMirjams Siegesgesang.[81] Webern hired Erich Leinsdorf as Singverein pianist in 1933;[aa] they performed Stravinsky's ballet-cantata Les Noces.[83][ab]
"Webern is the greatest conductor since Mahler himself", wrote Berg to Erwin Stein after Webern led Mahler's Third in 1922.[90][ac]RAVAG aired his performances at least twenty times starting in 1927. He was applauded as much as Willem Mengelberg in Holland.[92] In Le Ménestrel (1930), Armand Machabey noted Webern's regional reputation as a conductor of "haute valeur"[ad] for his meticulous approach to then contemporary music.[92]
Perhaps on religious grounds, Krenek speculated, Webern seemed uneasy in his dependence on the Social Democrats for conducting work.[93] Citing Roberto Gerhard and Hans Heinz Stuckenschmidt, Walter Kolneder judged, "Artistic work for and with workers was [from] a ... Christian standpoint which Webern took very seriously".[94] Some on the left, notably Oscar Pollak [de] in Der Kampf (1929), criticized Webern's programming as more ambitious and bourgeois than popular and proletarian.[95]
Webern's finances were often precarious, even in his years of relative success. Relief came from family, friends, patrons, and prizes.[96] He twice received the Preis der Stadt Wien für Musik [de].[ae] To compose more, he sought income while trying not to overcommit himself as a conductor.[100] He contracted with Universal Edition only after 1919, reaching better terms in 1927,[101] but he was not very ambitious or astute in business.[102] Even with a doctorate and Guido Adler's respect, he never secured a remunerative university position, whereas in 1925 Schoenberg was invited to the Prussian Academy of Arts, ending their seven years together in Mödling.[15]
In 1928, Berg celebrated the "lasting works" and successes of composers "whose point of departure was ... late Mahler, Reger, and Debussy and whose temporary end point is in ... Schoenberg" in their rise from "pitiful 'cliques'" to a large, diverse, international, and "irresistible movement".[108] But they were soon marginalized and ostracized in Central Europe with few exceptions.[109][aj]
Financial crises, complex social and political movements, pervasive antisemitism,[ak]culture wars, and renewed military conflicts[al] continued to shape Webern's world, profoundly circumscribing his life.[117] In the Austrian Civil War, Austrofascists[am] executed, exiled, and imprisoned Social Democrats, outlawed their party, and abolished cultural institutions.[119] Stigmatized by his decade-long association with Social Democrats, Webern lost a promising domestic conducting career, which might have been better recorded.[120] He worked as a UE editor and IGNM-Sektion Österreich [de] board member and president (1933–1938, 1945).[121]
Webern delivered an eight-lecture series Der Weg zur Neuen Musik[an] at Rita Kurzmann-Leuchter [de]'s and her physician husband Rudolf Kurzman's home (Feb.–Apr. 1933).[123] He attacked fascistcultural policy, asking "What will come of our struggle?" He observed that "'cultural Bolshevism' is the name given to everything that is going on around Schoenberg, Berg, and myself (Krenek too)"[ao] and warned, "Imagine what will be destroyed, wiped out, by this hate of culture!"[125] He lectured more at the Kurzmann-Leuchter home, privately in 1934–1935 on Beethoven's piano sonatas to about 40 attendees and later in 1937–1938.[126]
His music and that of Berg, Krenek, Schoenberg, et al. was declared "Jewish" in Austria[ap] and "Entartete Musik" by Nazis.[132][aq] Persevering, Webern wrote Krenek that "art has its own laws ... if one wants to achieve something in it, only these laws and nothing else can have validity";[ar] upon completing Op. 26 (1935), he wrote DJ Bach, "I hope it is so good that (if people ever get to know it) they will declare me ready for a concentration camp or an insane asylum!"[135] The Vienna Philharmonic nearly refused to play Berg's Violin Concerto (1936).[as]Peter Stadlen's 1937 Op. 27 premieres were the last Viennese Webern performances until after World War II.[137] The critical success of Hermann Scherchen's 1938 ISCM London Op. 26 premiere encouraged Webern to write more cantatas and reassured him after a cellist quit Op. 20 mid-performance, declaring it unplayable.[138]
Webern's milieu comprised increasingly vast differences.[139] Like most Austrians, he and his family were Catholic, though not church regulars; Webern was perhaps devout if unorthodox.[140] They became politically divided.[at] His friends (e.g., then Zionist Schoenberg,[au]left-leaning Berg[av]) were of a mostly Jewish milieu in late Imperial and then "red" (Social Democratic) Vienna.[152]Alma Mahler, Krenek, Willi Reich [de], and Stein preferred or supported the "lesser evil"[aw] of the Austrofascists (or aligned Italian fascists) vis-à-vis the Nazis.[154] Presuming power would moderate Hitler, Webern mediated among friends with an optimistic, perhaps self-soothing, complacency, exasperating those who were at risk.[155] He found himself surrounded mostly by one side as Schoenberg emigrated to the US (1933), Rudolf Ploderer died by suicide (1933),[ax] Berg died (1935), and DJ Bach, among others, fled or worse.[157]
Webern's views of National Socialism were variously described.[ay] His published items[az] reflected his audience or context.[159] Secondary literature reflected limited evidence or ideological orientations[ba] and admitted uncertainty.[161] Julie Brown noted hesitancy to approach the topic and echoed the Moldenhauers, considering the issue "vexed" and Webern a "political enigma".[162] Bailey Puffett considered his politics "somewhat vague" and his situation "complex", noting that he practically avoided definitive political association.[163] Johnson described him as "personally shy, a man of private feeling and essentially apolitical",[164] "prone to identify with Nazi politics as ... other ... Austrians".[165] Krasner surmised Webern's cognitive dissonance,[bb] finding him "idealistic and rather naive".[106] In 1943 Kurt List described Webern as "utterly ignorant" and "perpetual[ly] confus[ed]" about politics, "a ready prey to the personal influence of family and friends".[bc]
Webern conducted nine concerts as a BBC Symphony visiting conductor (1929–1936). He selected then little-known Mahler (including both nocturnes from the Symphony No. 7 in 1934), insisted on rehearsing at the piano with vocalists, and was criticized for coaching musical phrasing. Grief-stricken after Berg's death and overwhelmed by difficulties, he withdrew from the 1936 world premiere of Berg's Violin Concerto in Barcelona. There Krasner recalled,
[Webern] pleaded and exhorted the players to feel the inner expressive content of one, two, or three notes at a time—rehearsing repeatedly a single motif, one bar of music and only finally, a two- or four-bar phrase.
The two then played the concerto in London with BBC musicians, who rehearsed before Webern conducted. There Kenneth Anthony Wright observed Webern's "funny little explanations of the varying dynamics and flexibility of tempo"; "every syllable and every gesture of Webern was understood and lovingly heeded", said Krasner. The musicians "all admired and respected Webern", according to Sidonie Goossens. But Felix Aprahamian, Benjamin Britten, and Berthold Goldschmidt criticized Webern's conducting, and BBC management did not invite him back after 1936.[169][bd]
Krasner's last visit with Webern was interrupted by Kurt Schuschnigg's broadcast speech that the Anschluss was imminent.[170] Krasner had been playing some of Schoenberg's Violin Concerto for Webern and trying to convince him to write a sonata for solo violin.[171] When Webern turned on the radio and heard this speech, he urged Krasner to flee.[172] Because Webern's family included Nazis, Krasner wondered whether Webern had already known that the Anschluss was planned for that day.[173] He also wondered whether Webern's warning had been solely for his safety or whether it had also been to save Webern the embarrassment of the violinist's presence in the event of celebration at the Webern home.[174]
Much of Austria did celebrate.[175] But Webern made only a terse note of the Anschluss in his notebook without registering any clear emotion.[176] In fact, he wrote Jone and her husband Josef Humplik asking not to be disturbed as he was "totally immersed" in work on Op. 28.[177] Bailey Puffett suggested that Krasner's visit may have been a distraction and that he may have resented Webern, in hindsight,[be] for "refusing to see the reality of Hitler's antisemitism" until perhaps after 1936.[178][bf]
Support for the Anschluss rested on antisemitism, economic prospects,[bg] and the idea of a Greater Germany.[185][bh] Under some duress, Theodor Innitzer ushered in Catholic support.[195]Karl Renner supported unification as a matter of self-determination before the years (1933–1938) of Gleichschaltung and Nazi soft power,[bi] and he and others now supported (or accepted as inevitable) the 1938 Anschluss.[197][bj] Webern had long shared in common pan-German sentiments, especially during wartime.[199] He also likely hoped to conduct again, securing a firmer future for his family under a new regime proclaiming itself "socialist" no less than nationalist.[200] According to Josef Polnauer, a fellow early Schoenberg pupil, historian, and librarian, Webern's optimism was not dispelled until 1941.[201]
Kristallnacht shocked Webern. He visited and aided Jewish colleagues DJ Bach, Otto Jokl [de], Polnauer, and Hugo Winter.[202] For Jokl, a former Berg pupil, Webern wrote a recommendation letter to facilitate emigration. When that failed, Webern served as his godfather in a 1939 baptism.[203] Polnauer, whose emigration Schoenberg and Webern were unable to secure,[204] managed to survive the Holocaust as an albino; he later edited a 1959 UE publication of Webern's correspondence from this time with Humplik and Jone.[205] Webern moved Humplik's 1929 gift of a Mahler bust to his bedroom.[206]
Webern found himself increasingly alone,[207] with "almost all his friends and old pupils ... gone",[208] and his financial situation was poor. He had considered joining Schoenberg in the US since 1933 but was reluctant to leave home and family.[209] He entered a period of "inward emigration",[210] writing to artist Franz Rederer in 1939, "We live completely withdrawn. I work a lot."[203] He corresponded extensively to maintain relationships, imploring his student George Robert to play Schoenberg in New York[211] and expressing his loneliness and isolation to Schoenberg.[212] Then war limited postal service,[213] disrupting their direct correspondence completely by 1941.
1939–1945: Hope and disillusionment during World War II
Webern intimated to Willi Reich that he might emigrate there, joking (Oct. 1939) "Anything of the sort did seem quite out of the question for me!"[216] But Webern failed to find employment, even as a formality, likely due to anti-German sentiment in the context of Swiss neutrality and refugee laws.[217]
In the Reich, he met with former Society violist Othmar Steinbauer about a formal teaching role in Vienna in early 1940, but nothing materialized.[218] He lectured at the homes of Erwin Ratz and Carl Prohaska [de]'s widow Margaret (1940–1942).[219] Many private pupils came to him between 1940 and 1943, even from afar, among them briefly Karl Amadeus Hartmann.[220]
Sharing in wartime public sentiment at the height of Hitler's popularity (spring 1940), Webern expressed high hopes, crediting him as "unique" and "singular"[bl] for "the new state for which the seed was laid twenty years ago". These were patriotic letters to Joseph Hueber, an active soldier, baritone, close friend, and mountaineering companion who often sent Webern gifts.[221] Indeed, Hueber had just sent Webern Mein Kampf.[bm] Unaware of Stefan George's aversion to the Nazis, Webern reread Das neue Reich [de] and marveled suggestively at the wartime leader envisioned therein, but "I am not taking a position!" he wrote active soldier, singer, and onetime Social Democrat, Hans Humpelstetter.[223] For Johnson, "Webern's own image of a neue Reich was never of this world; if his politics were ultimately complicitous it was largely because his utopian apoliticism played so easily into ... the status quo."[224]
By Aug. 1940, Webern depended financially on his children.[225] He sought wartime emergency relief funds from Künstlerhilfe Wien and the ReichsmusikkammerKünstlerdank [de] (1940–1944), which he received despite indicating non-membership in the Nazi Party on an application.[226] Whether Webern ever joined the party was unknown.[227][bn] This represented his only income after mid-1942. He nearly exhausted his savings by 1944.[230]
His 1943–1945 letters were strewn with references to bombings, death, destruction, privation, and the disintegration of local order, but several grandchildren were born.[231] In Dec. 1943, aged 60, he wrote from a barrack that he was working 6 am–5 pm as an air-raid protection police officer, conscripted into the war effort.[231] He corresponded with Willi Reich about IGNM-Sektion Basel's concert marking his sixtieth, in which Paul Baumgartner played Op. 27, Walter Kägi Op. 7, and August Wenzinger Op. 11. Gradmann-Lüscher sang both Opp. 3 and the world premiere of 23.[232] For Schoenberg's 70th birthday (1944), Webern asked Reich to convey "my most heartfelt remembrances, ... longing! ... hopes for a happy future!"[233] Webern's only son Peter, intermittently conscripted since 1940,[234] was killed (14 Feb. 1945) in an air attack. Airstrikesirens interrupted the family's mourning.[235]
The Weberns assisted Schoenberg's first son Görgi during the war; with the Red Army's April 1945 arrival imminent, they gave him their Mödling apartment, the property and childhood home of Webern's son-in-law Benno Mattl.[bo] Görgi later told Krasner that Webern "felt he'd betrayed his best friends."[237] The Weberns fled west, resorting to traveling partly on foot to Mittersill to rejoin their family of "17 persons pressed together in the smallest possible space".[231]
On the night of 15 Sept. 1945, Webern was outside smoking when he was shot and killed by a US soldier in an apparent accident.[238] He had been following Thomas Mann's work, which the Nazis had burned, noting in 1944 that Mann had finished Joseph and His Brothers.[239] In his last notebook entry, Webern quoted Rainer Maria Rilke: "Who speaks of victory? To endure is everything."[240][bp]
Webern's wife Minna suffered final years of grief, poverty, and loneliness as friends and family continued emigrating. She wished Webern lived to see more success. With the abolition of Entartete Kunst policies, Alfred Schlee [de] solicited her for hidden manuscripts; thus Opp. 17, 24–25, and 29–31 were published. She worked to get Webern's 1907 Piano Quintet published via Kurt List.
In 1947 she wrote Dietz, now in the US, that by 1945 Webern was "firmly resolved to go to England". Likewise, in 1946 she wrote DJ Bach in London: "How difficult the last eight years had been for him. ... [H]e had only the one wish: to flee from this country. But one was caught, without a will of one's own. ... It was close to the limit of endurance what we had to suffer."[243] Minna died in 1949.
Tell me, can one at all denote thinking and feeling as things entirely separable? I cannot imagine a sublime intellect without the ardor of emotion.
Webern wrote to Schoenberg (June 1910).[244]Theodor Adorno described Webern as "propound[ing] musical expressionism in its strictest sense, ... to such a point that it reverts of its own weight to a new objectivity".[245]
Webern's music was generally concise, organic, and parsimonious,[bq] with very small motifs, palindromes, and parameterization on both the micro- and macro-scale.[251] His idiosyncratic approach reflected affinities with Schoenberg, Mahler,[br] Guido Adler and early music; interest in esotericism and Naturphilosophie; and thorough perfectionism.[bs] He engaged with the work of Goethe, Bach,[bt] and the Franco-Flemish School in addition to that of Wolf, Brahms,[bu] Wagner, Liszt, Schumann, Beethoven, Schubert ("so genuinely Viennese"), and Mozart.[266][bv] Stylistic shifts were not neatly coterminous with gradually developed technical devices, particularly in the case of his mid-period Lieder.[bw]
His music was also characteristically linear and song-like.[274] Much of it (and Berg's[275] and Schoenberg's)[276] was for singing.[24][bx] Johnson described the song-like gestures of Op. 11/i.[279] In Webern's mid-period Lieder, some heard instrumentalizing of the voice[280] (often in relation to the clarinet)[281] representing yet some continuity with bel canto.[282][by] Lukas Näf described one of Webern's signature hairpins (on the Op. 21/i mm. 8–9 bass clarinettenuto note) as a messa di voce requiring some rubato to execute faithfully.[284][bz] Adventurous textures and timbres, and melodies of wide leaps and sometimes extreme ranges and registers were typical.[286]
For Johnson, Webern's rubato compressed Mahler's "'surging and ebbing'" tempi; this and Webern's dynamics indicated a "vestigial lyrical subjectivity."[287] Webern often set carefully chosen lyric poetry.[288] He related his music not only to nostalgia for the lost family and home of his youth, but also to his Alpinism and fascination with botanicalaromatics and morphology.[289] He was compared to Mahler in his orchestration and semantic preoccupations (e.g., memory, landscapes, nature, loss, often Catholicmysticism).[290] In Jone, who he met with her husband Humplik via the Hagenbund, Webern found a lyricist who shared his esoteric, natural, and spiritual interests. She provided texts for his late vocal works.[291]
Relatively few of Webern's works were published in his lifetime. Amid fascism and Emil Hertzka's passing, this included late as well as early works (in addition to others without opus numbers). His rediscovery prompted many publications, but some early works were unknown until after the work of the Moldenhauers well into the 1980s,[299] obscuring formative facets of his musical identity.[300] Thus when Boulez first oversaw a project to record Webern's music, the results fit on three CDs and the second time, six.[301][cd] A Gesamtausgabe has remained in progress.
1899–1908: Formative juvenilia and emergence from study
Webern published little juvenilia; like Brahms, he was meticulous and self-conscious, revising extensively.[303] His earliest works were mostly Lieder on works of Richard Dehmel, Gustav Falke, and Theodor Storm.[304] He set seven Ferdinand Avenarius poems on the "changing moods" of life and nature (1899–1904).[305] Schubert, Schumann, and Wolf were important models. With its brief, potent expressivity and utopianization of the natural world, the (German) RomanticLied had a lasting influence on Webern's musical aesthetic.[306] He never abandoned its lyricism, intimacy, and wistful or nostalgic topics, though his music became more abstract, idealized, and introverted.[304]
Webern memorialized the Preglhof in a diary poem "An der Preglhof" and in the tone poemIm Sommerwind (1904), both after Bruno Wille's idyll. In Webern's Sommerwind, Derrick Puffett found affinities with Strauss's Alpensinfonie, Charpentier's Louise, and Delius's Paris.
At the Pregholf in summer 1905, Webern wrote his tripartite, single-movement string quartet in a highly modifiedsonata form, likely responding to Schoenberg's Op. 7.[307] He quoted Jakob Böhme in the preface[308] and mentioned the panels[ce] of Segantini's Trittico della natura[cf] as "Werden–Sein–Vergehen"[cg] in sketches.[309] Sebastian Wedler argued that this quartet bore the influence of Richard Strauss's Also Sprach Zarathustra in its germinal three-note motive, opening fugato of its third (development) section, and Nietzschean reading (via eternal recurrence) of Segantini's triptych.[310] In its opening harmonies, Allen Forte and Heinz-Klaus Metzger noted Webern's anticipation of Schoenberg's atonality in Op. 10.[311]
In 1906, Schoenberg assigned Webern Bach chorales to harmonize and figure; Webern completed eighteen in a highly chromatic idiom.[312] Then the Passacaglia, Op. 1 (1908) was his graduation piece, and the Op. 2 choral canons soon followed. The passacaglia's chromatic harmonic language and less conventional orchestration distinguished it from prior works; its form foreshadowed those of his later works.[313] Conducting the 1911 Danzig premiere of Op. 1 at the Friedrich-Wilhelm-Schützenhaus [de], he paired it with Debussy's 1894 Prélude à l'après-midi d'un faune, Ludwig Thuille's 1896 Romantische Ouvertüre, and Mahler's 1901–1904 Kindertotenlieder in a poorly attended Moderner Abend[ch] concert. The Danziger Zeitung [de]critic derided Op. 1 as an "insane experiment".[314]
In 1908 Webern also began an opera on Maeterlinck's Alladine et Palomides [fr], of which only unfinished sketches remained.[315] Debussy's Pelléas et Mélisande enraptured him twice in Dec. 1908 Berlin and again in 1911 Vienna.[316] As a vocal coach and opera conductor, he knew the repertoire "perfectly ... every cut, ... unmarkedcadenza, and in the comic operas every theatrical joke".[317] He "adored" Mozart's Il Seraglio and revered Strauss, predicting Salome would last. When in high spirits, Webern would sing bits of Lortzing's Zar und Zimmermann, a personal favorite. He expressed interest (to Max Deutsch) in writing an opera pending a good text and adequate time; in 1930, he asked Jone for "opera texts, or rather dramatic texts", planning cantatas instead.[318]
Spending summer 1909 with Webern (et al.) and seeing his Op. 5 manuscript reinvigorated Schoenberg's music, inspiring him to write Busoni: "... away with 'motivic working out.' Away with harmony as cement or bricks of a building. Harmony is expression and nothing else. ... Away with Pathos [and] protracted ten-ton scores ... . My music must be brief. Concise! In two notes: not built, but expressed!! ... no stylized and sterile protracted emotion. People are not like that" (Schoenberg's emphases).[319]
Webern's music, like Schoenberg's, was freely atonal after Op. 2. Some of their and Berg's music from this time was published in Der Blaue Reiter.[320] Schoenberg and Webern were so mutually influential, the former later joked, "I haven't the slightest idea who I am".[321] In Op. 5/iii, Webern borrowed from Schoenberg's Op. 10/ii. In Op. 5/iv, he borrowed from Schoenberg's Op. 10/iv setting of "Ich fühle luft von anderen planeten".[322][ci]
The first of Webern's innovative and increasingly extremely aphoristic Opp. 5–11 (1909–1914) radically influenced Schoenberg's Opp. 11/iii[cj] and 16–17 (and Berg's Opp. 4–5).[324] Here, Martin Zenck [de] considered, Webern did not seek "the new ... in [music of] the past but in the future".[325] In writing the Op. 9 bagatelles, Webern reflected in 1932, "I had the feeling that when the twelve notes had all been played the piece was over."[326] "[H]aving freed music from the shackles of tonality," Schoenberg wrote, he and his pupils believed "music could renounce motivic features".[327] This "intuitive aesthetic" arguably proved to be aspirational insofar as motives persisted in their music.[328]
Webern's music took on the character of such static dramaticovisual scenes, with pieces frequently culminating in the accumulation and amalgamation (often the developing variation) of compositional material. Fragmented melodies frequently began and ended on weak beats, settled into or emerged from ostinati, and were dynamically and texturally faded, mixed, or contrasted.[330] Tonality became less directional, functional, or narrative than tenuous, spatial, or symbolic as fit Webern's topics and literary settings. Stein thought that "his compositions should be understood as musical visions".[ck]Oliver Korte traced Webern's Klangfelder[cl] to Mahler's "suspensions".[cm]
Expanding on Mahler's orchestration, Webern linked colorful, novel, fragile, and intimate sounds, often nearly silent at ppp, to lyrical topics: solo violin to female voice; closed or open voicings, sometimes sul ponticello, to dark or light respectively; compressed range to absence, emptiness, or loneliness; registral expansion to fulfillment, (spiritual) presence, or transcendence;[cn] celesta, harp, and glockenspiel to the celestial or ethereal; and trumpet, harp, and string harmonics to angels or heaven.[332][co]
In this excerpt (mm. 20–29) is Webern's lyric setting of the text "[Gott ... nehme dich] barmherzig auf in jenes bess're Leben".[333][ct]Julian Johnson noted Webern's use of first short, then long note values and phrases to impart a sense of calm rest before the final high harp harmonic, a tone painting of heaven.[334]
During and after World War I (1914–1926) Webern worked on some fifty-six songs.[335] He finished thirty-two, ordered into sets (in ways that do not always align with their chronology) as Opp. 12–19.[335] The first of these mid-period Lieder was an unfinished setting of a passage ("In einer lichten Rose ...") from Dante's Paradiso, Canto XXXI.[336] Webern had learned from the example of Schoenberg's vocal music "that one cannot persist with ... absolute purity".[337]
Taking Schoenberg's advice to write songs as a means of composing something more substantial than aphorisms, he often made earnest settings of folk, lyric, or spiritual texts.[338] By comparison to melodic "atomization" in Op. 11, Walter Kolneder noted relatively "long arcs" melodic writing in Op. 12[339] and polyphonic part writing to "control the ... expression" in Opp. 12–16 more generally.[340] "How much I owe to your Pierrot", Webern told Schoenberg after setting Georg Trakl's "Abendland III" (Op. 14/iv),[341] in which, distinctly, there was no silence until a pause at the concluding gesture. The contrapuntal procedures and nonstandard ensemble of Pierrot are both evident in Webern's Opp. 14–16.[342]
Schoenberg "yearn[ed] for a style for large forms ... to give personal things an objective, general form."[cu] Berg, Webern, and he had indulged their shared interest in Swedenborgian mysticism and Theosophy since 1906, reading Balzac's Louis Lambert and Séraphîta and Strindberg's Till Damaskus and Jacob lutte. Gabriel, protagonist of Schoenberg's semi-autobiographical Die Jakobsleiter (1914–1922, rev. 1944)[cv] described a journey: "whether right, whether left, forwards or backwards, uphill or down – one must keep on going without asking what lies ahead or behind",[cw] which Webern interpreted as a pitch-space metaphor. Schoenberg later reflected on "how enthusiastic we were about this."[cx]
On the journey to composition with twelve tones, Webern revised many of his mid-period Lieder in the years after their apparent composition but before publication, increasingly prioritizing clarity of pitch relations, even against timbral effects, as Anne Shreffler[348] and Felix Meyer described. His and Schoenberg's music had long been marked by its contrapuntal rigor, formal schemes, systematic pitch organization, and rich motivic design, all of which they found in the music of Brahms before them.[349] Webern had written music preoccupied with the idea of dodecaphony since at least the total chromaticism of his Op. 9 bagatelles (1911)[350] and Op. 11 cello pieces (1914).[351][cy]
There are twelve-tone sets with repeated notes at the start of Op. 12/i and in some bars of Op. 12/iv, in addition to many ten- and eleven-tone sets throughout Op. 12.[353] Webern wrote to Jalowetz in 1922 about Schoenberg's lectures on "a new type of motivic work", one that "unfolds the entire development of, if I may say so, our technique (harmony, etc)".[354] It was "almost everything that has occupied me for about ten years", Webern continued.[355] He regarded Schoenberg's transformation of twelve-tone rows as the "solution" to their compositional concerns.[356] In Op. 15/iv (1922), Webern first used a tone row (in the voice's opening twelve notes), charted the four basic row forms, and integrated tri- and tetrachords into the harmonic and melodic texture.[357] He systematically used twelve-tone technique for the first time in Op. 16/iv–v (1924).[358]
An excerpt (mm. 49–59) from the first movement of Webern's String Trio, Op. 20. At 0:07–0:18 in this excerpt (mm. 51–56), there are repeated figures in fixed (or "frozen") register, comprising the second B section of this movement's seven-part ABACABA rondo.[359] Kathryn Bailey Puffett likened them to bell ringers' technique in ringing changes.[360]
With Schoenberg leaving Mödling in 1925 and this compositional approach at his disposal, Webern obtained more artistic autonomy and aspired to write in larger forms, expanding on the extreme concentration of expression and material in his earlier music.[361] Until the Kinderstück for piano (1924, intended as one of a set), Klavierstück (1925), and Satz for string trio (1925), Webern had finished nothing but Lieder since a 1914 cello sonata.[362][cz] The 1926–1927 String Trio, Op. 20, was his first large-scale non-vocal work in more than a decade. For its 1927 publication, Webern helped Stein write an introduction emphasizing continuity with tradition:[364]
The principle of developing a movement by variation of motives and themes is the same as with the classical masters ... [only] varied more radically here ... . One 'tone series' furnishes the basic material ... . The parts are composed in a mosaic-like manner ...
Webern's large-scale, non-vocal music in more traditional genres,[db] written from 1926 to 1940, has been celebrated as his most rigorous and abstract music.[368] Yet he always wrote his music and tried his new compositional procedures with concern for (or at least some latent reference to) expressivity and representation.[369][dc] In sketches for his Op. 22 quartet, Webern conceived of his themes in programmatic association with his experiences—as an "outlook into the highest region" or a "coolness of early spring (Anninger,[dd] first flora, primroses, anemones, pasqueflowers)", for example.[374] Studying his compositional materials and sketches, Bailey Puffett wrote,[375]
... [Webern] seems perhaps not ... a prodigy whose music was the result of reasoned calculations [but a composer] who used his row tables as Stravinsky used his piano, to reveal wonderful surprises ... [like] he found on his walks in the Alps.
In Webern's late cantatas and songs,[de]George Rochberg observed, "the principles of 'the structural spatial dimension' ... join[ed] forces with lyrico-dramatic demands".[377] Specifically in his cantatas, Bailey Puffett wrote, Webern synthesized the rigorous style of his mature instrumental works with the word painting of his Lieder on an orchestral scale.[378] Webern qualified the apparent connection between his cantatas and Bach's as general and referred to connections between the second cantata and the music of the Franco-Flemish School.[379] His textures became somewhat denser yet more homophonic at the surface through nonetheless contrapuntal polyphonic means.[380] In Op. 31/i he alternated lines and points, culminating twice[df] in twelve-note simultaneities.[381]
At his death he left sketches for the movement of an apparent third cantata (1944–1945), first planned as a concerto, setting "Das Sonnenlicht spricht" from Jone's Lumen cycle.[382]
In his youth (1903), Webern orchestrated five or more Schubert Lieder for an appropriately Schubertian orchestra (strings and pairs of flutes, oboes, clarinets, bassoons, and horns). Among these were "Der Vollmond Strahlt auf Bergeshöhn" (the Romanze from Rosamunde), "Tränenregen" (from Die schöne Müllerin), "Der Wegweiser" (from Winterreise), "Du bist die Ruh", and "Ihr Bild".[383]
After attending Hugo Wolf's funeral and memorial concert (1903), he arranged three Lieder for a larger orchestra, adding brass, harp, and percussion to the Schubertian orchestra. He chose "Lebe wohl", "Der Knabe und das Immlein", and "Denk es, o Seele", of which only the latter was finished or wholly survived.[384]
In 1924 Webern arranged Liszt's Arbeiterchor (Workers' Chorus, c. 1847–1848)[386] for bass solo, mixed chorus, and large orchestra; thus Liszt's work was finally premièred[dg] when Webern conducted the first full-length concert of the Austrian Association of Workers Choir (13 and 14 March 1925). A review in the Wiener Zeitung (28 March 1925) read "neu in jedem Sinne, frisch, unverbraucht, durch ihn zieht die Jugend, die Freude" ("new in every respect, fresh, vital, pervaded by youth and joy").[388] The text (in English translation) read in part: "Let us have the adorned spades and scoops,/Come along all, who wield a sword or pen,/Come here ye, industrious, brave and strong/All who create things great or small."
In orchestrating the six-voice ricercar from Bach's Musikalisches Opfer, Webern timbrally defined the internal organization (or latent subsets) of the Bach's subject.[389] Joseph N. Straus argued that Webern (and other modernists) effectively recomposed earlier music, "projecting motivic density" onto tradition.[390] After more conservatively orchestrating two of Schubert's 1824 Six German Dances on UE commission in 1931, he wrote Schoenberg:
I took pains to remain on the solid ground of classical ideas of instrumentation, yet to place them into the service of our idea, i.e., as a means toward the greatest possible clarification of thought and context.[dh]
Webern's music was generally considered difficult by performers and inaccessible by listeners alike.[392] "To the limited extent that it was regarded", Milton Babbitt observed, it represented "the ultimate in hermetic, specialized, and idiosyncratic composition".[393]
Composers and performers first tended to take Webern's work, with its residual post-Romanticism and initial expressionism, in mostly formalist directions with a certain literalism, departing from Webern's own practices and preferences in extrapolating from elements of his late style. This became known as post-Webernism.[394] A richer, more historically informed understanding of Webern's music and his performance practice began to emerge in the latter half of the 20th century as scholars, especially the Moldenhauers, sought and archived sketches, letters, lectures, recordings, and other articles of Webern's (and others') estates.[di]
In the immediate aftermath of World War II, Webern's marginalization under Gleichschaltung was appreciated, but his pan-Germanism, politics, and social attitudes (especially regarding antisemitism) were not as known or often mooted.[395] For many, like Stravinsky, Webern never compromised his artistic identity and values, but for others the matter was less simple.[dj]
Eric Simon ... related ... : 'Webern was obviously upset by Klemperer's sober time-beating. ... [T]o the concert master [he] said: "... the phrase there ... must be played Tiiiiiiiiiii-aaaaaaaaa." Klemperer, overhearing ... said sarcastically: "... [N]ow you probably know exactly how you have to play the passage!"' Peter Stadlen ... [described Webern]'s reaction after the performance: ... '"A high note, a low note, a note in the middle—like the music of a madman!"'
The Moldenhauers detailed Webern's reaction to Otto Klemperer's 1936 Vienna performance of his Symphony (1928), Op. 21, which Webern played on piano for Klemperer "with ... intensity and fanaticism ... passionately".[396]
Webern notated articulations, dynamics, tempo rubato, and other musical expressions, coaching performers to adhere to these instructions but urging them to maximize expressivity through musical phrasing.[396][dk] This was supported by personal accounts, correspondence, and extant recordings of Schubert's Deutsche Tänze (arr. Webern) and Berg's Violin Concerto under Webern's direction. Ian Pace considered Peter Stadlen's account of Webern's coaching for Op. 27 as indicating Webern's "desire for an extremely flexible, highly diaphanous, and almost expressively overloaded approach".[398][dl]
Felix Galimir of the Galimir Quartet told The New York Times (1981): "Berg asked for enormous correctness in the performance of his music. But the moment this was achieved, he asked for a very Romanticized treatment. Webern, you know, was also terribly Romantic—as a person, and when he conducted. Everything was almost over-sentimentalized. It was entirely different from what we have been led to believe today. His music should be played very freely, very emotionally."[403]
Many artists portrayed Webern (often from life) in their work. Kokoschka (1912), Schiele (1917 and 1918), B. F. Dolbin [de] (1920 and 1924), and Rederer (1934) made drawings of him. Oppenheimer (1908), Kokoschka (1914), and Tom von Dreger [de] (1934) painted him. Stumpp made two lithographs of him (1927). Humplik twice sculpted him (1927 and 1928). Jone variously portrayed him (1943 lithograph, several posthumous drawings, 1945 oil painting). Rederer made a large woodcut of him (1964).[404]
Schoenberg admired Webern's concision, writing in the foreword to Op. 9 upon its 1924 publication: "to express a novel in a single gesture, joy in a single breath—such concentration can only be present in proportion to the absence of self-indulgence".[405] But Berg joked about Webern's brevity. Hendrik Andriessen found Webern's music "pitiful" in this regard.[406] In their second (1925) Abbruch[dm] self-parody, Anbruch [de][dn] editors jested that "Webern's" (Mahler's) "extensive" Symphony of a Thousand had to be abbreviated.[do]
Felix Khuner remembered Webern was "just as revolutionary" as Schoenberg.[407] In 1927, Hans Mersmann wrote that "Webern's music shows the frontiers and ... limits of a development which tried to outgrow Schoenberg's work."[408]
Identifying with Webern as a "solitary soul" amid 1940s wartime fascism,[409]Luigi Dallapiccola independently and somewhat singularly[dp] found inspiration especially in Webern's lesser-known mid-period Lieder, blending its ethereal qualities and Viennese expressionism with bel canto.[410] Stunned by Webern's Op. 24 at its 1935 ISCM festival world première under Jalowetz in Prague, Dallapiccola's impression was of unsurpassable "aesthetic and stylistic unity".[411] He dedicated Sex carmina alcaei[dq] "with humility and devotion" to Webern, who he met in 1942 through Schlee, coming away surprised at Webern's emphasis on "our great Central European tradition."[412] Dallapiccola's 1953 Goethe-lieder especially recall Webern's Op. 16 in style.[413]
In 1947, Schoenberg remembered and stood firm with Berg and Webern despite rumors of the latter's having "fallen into the Nazi trap":[dr] "... [F]orget all that might have ... divided us. For there remains for our future what could only have begun to be realized posthumously: One will have to consider us three—Berg, Schoenberg, and Webern—as a unity, a oneness, because we believed in ideals ... with intensity and selfless devotion; nor would we ever have been deterred from them, even if those who tried might have succeeded in confounding us."[ds] For Krasner this put "'Vienna's Three Modern Classicists' into historical perspective". He summarized it as "what bound us together was our idealism."[414]
Webern's death should be a day of mourning for any receptive musician. We must hail ... this great ... a real hero. Doomed to ... failure in a deaf world of ignorance and indifference he ... kept on cutting ... dazzling diamonds, the mines of which he had ... perfect knowledge.
After World War II, there was unprecedented engagement with Webern's music. It came to represent a universally or generally valid, systematic, and compellingly logical model of new composition, especially at the Darmstädter Ferienkurse.[419]René Leibowitz performed, promulgated, and published Schoenberg et son école;[420] Adorno,[421]Herbert Eimert, Scherchen,[422] and others contributed. Composers and students[du] listened in a quasi-religious trance to Peter Stadlen's 1948 Op. 27 performance.[423]
In the US, Babbitt[426] and initially Rochberg[427] found more in Schoenberg's twelve-tone practice. Elliott Carter's and Aaron Copland's critical ambivalence was marked by a certain enthusiasm and fascination nonetheless.[428] Robert Craft fruitfully reintroduced Stravinsky to Webern's music, without which Stravinsky's late works would have taken different shape. Stravinsky staked his contract with Columbia Records to see Webern's then known music first both recorded and widely distributed.[429] Stravinsky lauded Webern's "not yet canonized art" in 1959.[430]
Gottfried Michael Koenig suggested some early interest in Webern's music may have been that its concision and apparent simplicity facilitated didactic musical analysis. Robert Beyer [de] criticized serial approaches to Webern's music as reductive, narrowly focused more on Webern's procedures than his music while neglecting timbre in their typical selection of Opp. 27–28.[432] Webern's music sounded like "a Mondrian canvas", "crude and unfinished", to Karel Goeyvaerts.[433]Wolf-Eberhard von Lewinski criticized some Darmstadt music as "acoustically absurd [if] visually amusing" (Darmstädter Tagblatt [de], 1959); a Der Kurier article of his was headlined "Meager modern music—only interesting to look at".[434]
[H]ermetic constructivism seems infused with intense emotion, ... diffused across the ... surface of the music. Gone is the mono-directional thrust of Classical and Romantic music; in its place a world of rotations and reflections, opening myriad paths for the listener to trace through textures of luminous clarity yet beguiling ambiguity.
George Benjamin described Webern's Op. 21.[435] Many[dw] noted floating, spatial, static, or suspended qualities in some of Webern's music. Johnson noted spatial metaphors.[438]
Through late 1950s onward, Webern's work reached musicians as far removed as Frank Zappa,[439] yet many post-war European musicians and scholars had already begun to look beyond[440] as much as back at Webern in his context. Nono advocated for a more humanistic understanding of Webern's music.[441]
Adorno lectured that in the prevailing climate "artists like Berg or Webern would hardly be able to make it" ("The Aging of the New Music", 1954). Against the "static idea of music" and "totalrationalization" of the "pointillist constructivists," he advocated for more subjectivity, citing Über das Geistige in der Kunst (1911), in which Wassily Kandinsky wrote: "Schoenberg's [expressionist] music leads us to where musical experience is a matter not of the ear, but of the soul—and from this point begins the music of the future."
In the 1960s, many began to describe Webern and his like as a "dead end".[442][dx] Rochberg felt "Webern's music leaves his followers no new, unexplored territory."[445] Stravinsky judged Webern "too original ... too purely himself. ... [T]he entire world had to imitate him [and] fail; of course it will blame Webern"; he blamed post-Webernism: "[T]he music now being charged to his name can neither diminish his strength nor stale his perfection."[446]
In Votre Faust (1960–1968), Pousseur quoted and his protagonist Henri analyzed Webern's Op. 31. Yet there were already several elements of late or postmodernism (e.g., eclecticism of historical styles, mobile form, polyvalent roles).[447] This coincided with a wider rapprochement with Berg,[448] whose example Pousseur cited,[449] from whose music he also quoted, and whose writings he translated into French in the 1950s.[450] Boulez was "thrilled" by Berg's "universe ... never completed, always in expansion—a world so ... inexhaustible," referring to the rigorously organized, only partly twelve-tone Chamber Concerto.[dy]
Engaging with Webern's atonal works by some contrast to earlier post-Webernism, both Ferneyhough and Lachenmann expanded upon and went further than Webern in attention to the smallest of details and the use of ever more radically extended techniques. Ferneyhough's 1967 Sonatas for string quartet included atonal sections much in the style of Webern's Op. 9, yet more intensely sustained. In a comparison to his own 1969 Air, Lachenmann wrote of "a melody made of a single note ... in the viola part" of Webern's Op. 10/iv (mm. 2–4) amid "the mere ruins of the traditional linguistic context," observing that "the pure tone, now living in tonal exile, has in this new context no aesthetic advantage over pure noise" ("Hearing [Hören] is Defenseless—without Listening [Hören]", 1985).
Webern's influence predominated after the Hungarian Revolution of 1956, bearing on Pál Kadosa, Endre Szervánszky, and György Kurtág.[456] Among Czechs, Pavel Blatný attended the Darmstädter Ferienkurse and wrote music with serial techniques in the late 1960s. He returned to tonality in Brno and was rewarded.[457]Marek Kopelent discovered the Second Viennese as an editor and was particularly taken by Webern.[458] Kopelent was blacklisted for his music and despaired, unable to attend international performances of his work.[459]
In Soviet Music, Marcel Rubin criticized "Webern and His Followers" (1959), by contrast to Berg and Schoenberg, for going too far.[464]Alfred Schnittke complained in an open letter (1961) of composers' restricted education.[465] Through Grigory Shneyerson's anti-formalist On Music Living and Dead (1960) and Johannes Paul Thilman's anti-modernist "On the Dodecaphonic Method of Composition" (1958), many (e.g., Eduard Artemyev, Victor Ekimovsky, Vladimir Martynov, Boris Tischenko[ea]) ironically learned more about what had been and even was still forbidden.[467] Kruschchev warned, "dodecaphonic music, music of noises ... this cacophonic music we totally reject. Our people cannot include such trash".[468]
Through Andrei Volkonsky, Lydia Davydova recalled, Schoenberg's and Webern's music came to Russia alongside Renaissance and early Baroque music.[469] Tischenko remembered that in the 1960s, Volkonsky "was the first swallow of the avant-garde. [T]hose who came after him ... already followed in his tracks. I consider [him] the discoverer."[469]Edison Denisov described the 1960s as his "second conservatory", crediting Volkonsky not only for introducing Webern, but also Gesualdo.[470]
Webern's legacy, bitterly contested in the "serial wars",[ed] remained subject to polemic vicissitudes. Musicologists quarreled[479][ee] amid the "Restoration of the 1980s", as Martin Kaltenecker termed a paradigm shift from structure to perception within musicological discourse.[ef]Charles Rosen scorned "historical criticism ... avoiding any serious engagement with a work or style ... one happens not to like".[480] Andreas Holzer warned of "post-factual tendencies".[481][eg] Pamela M. Potter advised considering "the complexity of ... day-to-day existence" under Nazism, partly in considering the relevance of composers' politics to their canonic status.[483] Meanwhile Allen Forte and Bailey Puffett formally analyzed Webern's atonal and twelve-tone œuvres respectively.
Tim Page noted less formalist readings of Webern's work at his 1983 birth centenary.[484] The occasion "went almost unmarked", Glenn Watkins observed, "a fate hardly imaginable for Berg [on his] 1985 [centenary]". After Webern's mid-century "meteoric ascension and ultimate canonization",[485] Watkins described "quick shifts of interest" tapering to neglect.[486] Webern's music was established but infrequent in standard (repeating) orchestral repertoire.[487][eh] His œuvre was played at the Venice Festival of Contemporary Music (1983),[491]Juilliard (1995), and the Vienna Festival (2004), echoing six international festivals in his name (1962–1978).[ei] In some obscurity (1941 or 1942), Webern had been quietly sure that "in the future even the postman will whistle my melodies!"[493] But many did not acquire such a taste.[494][ej] He remained polarizing and provocative.[502][ek]
Noting this aspect of his reception, Johnson described Webern's "almost unique position in the canon of Western composers".[504] Christian Thorau argued Webern's innovations impeded his "exoterischen Kanonisierung".[505][el] By contrast to the "concert canon", Anne C. Shreffler considered Webern's better standing in a "separate canon" of technical and formal innovation.[506][em] Burkholder argued that music of the "historicist tradition",[en] including Webern's, was secure in "a musical museum", "for that is what the concert hall has become".[512][eo] Mark Berry described Webern, already among Boulez's "big five", as one of five "canonical pillars of classic historical early twentieth-century modernism".[ep] David H. Miller suggested Webern "achieved a certain kind of acceptance and canonization".[519]
Pascal Decroupet observed an unquestioned "canon of polarizations" in prior histories.[542][ev] Johnson noted the "co-existence and interaction of diverse stylistic practices" with "remarkable similarities", challenging "conservative and progressive" campism[545] and decentering musicology's technical periodizations[546] via the longue durée of globalmodernity.[547][ew] Thus he ventured continuity[549] between the "broken homeland" of Webern's Opp. 12–18 and the "broken pastoral" of Monteverdi's L'Orfeo and Vaughan Williams' Pastoral Symphony;[550][ex] between Webern's "evanescent images of musical fullness"[551] and the brief, fragmentary nature of Chopin's Op. 28, which Schumann likened to "ruins".[553] Building on Shreffler's and Felix Meyer's sketch studies as institutions[ey] acquired and made the Moldenhauers' estate accessible,[ez] Johnson worked toward a hermeneutics of Webern's (and Mahler's) music.[555]
^They also attended the opera and Mahler's symphonies together.[14]
^In 1925, Guido Adler asked Webern to edit the third edition. Webern declined due to financial and time constraints, instead proposing lectures on instrumentation and "modern music (Strauss, Mahler, Reger, Schoenberg) in the manner of ... Formenlehre, [or] formal principles (musical logic) and their connection with ... older masters".[15]
^Webern may have seen newspaper ads for Schoenberg's Schwarzwald School courses in 1904. Karl Weigl, another Adler student, impressed Webern with the score of Schoenberg's Op. 5 in 1902. In 1903–1904, Webern attended performances of Schoenberg's Lieder and Op. 4.[21]
^Webern and others gave Schoenberg Klimt prints for his 1921 birthday.[28]
^In 1926, he counseled his pupil Ludwig Zenk, then in an analogous situation, not to resign ("Do not allow yourself to be angered"), citing the examples of Mahler's conflicts with Felix von Kraus over tempi and "How Mahler had to suffer under [Bernhard] Pollini for so many years!"[42]
^Most references to a Volksoper in the Moldenhauers' Chronicle are to the famous one in Vienna, but Webern's father referred to one in Berlin.[44]
^Webern was "effusive and ecstatic" in his veneration of Mahler.[48]
^This "Praise of Criticism" was an early version of "Lob des hohen Verstandes" ("Praise of Lofty Intellect") from Des Knaben Wunderhorn.[49]
^Webern specified which ones to Berg: "Passacaglia, [String] Quartet, most [early] songs, ... second Quartet [Op. 5], ... first orchestral pieces [Op. 6], ... second [orchestral pieces, Op. 10] (with some exceptions)". Julian Johnson argued this held for most of Webern's œuvre as part of "larger and more complex bundle of ideas whose genealogy and weight are cultural ..."[69]
^Leinsdorf considered the experience of "utmost value to my musical and critical development".[82]
^Its popevki-like 3-7Acell and its 4–10 variant[84] were not altogether unlike the rhythmized trichords of Webern's later Op. 24[85] or the tetrachords of Op. 30[86] (which Stravinsky later admired),[87] apart from Stravinsky's tendency to anhemitony[88] in marked contrast to Webern's hemitonicism.[89]
^The first 1924 prize, juried by Julius Bittner, Joseph Marx, and Richard Strauss, was shared by several, including Berg, Carl Prohaska [de], Franz Schmidt, Max Springer, and Karl Weigl; the note was signed by Karl Seitz, who asked Webern at a concert two weeks prior, "Are you a professional musician?"[97] Berg and Webern later served as jurists.[98] Only Webern received the prize in 1931.[99]
^"Die Kundgebung des geistigen Wien," April 20, 1927; it read in part, with emphasis in original: "The essence of Spirit [Geist] is above all Freedom, which is now endangered and we feel obligated to protect it. The struggle for a higher humanity and the battle against indolence [Trägheit] and sclerosis [Verödung] will always find us ready. Today, it also finds us prepared for battle."[104]
^Before his suicide in 1942, Stefan Zweig wrote, "the short decade between 1924 and 1933, from the end of German inflation to Hitler's seizure of power, represents—in spite of all—an intermission in the catastrophic sequence of events whose witnesses and victims our generation has been since 1914."[110]
^Webern was antisemitic from his youth into his adulthood.[114] This surfaced in a months-long 1919 break he made with Schoenberg, Berg reported to his wife. Felix Greissle [de] contextualized this as part of Webern's vacillating resentment and respect toward Schoenberg.[115] According to Greissle, Schoenberg was self-conscious of his Jewish and class background, having internalized some antisemitism. Greissle's son Georg recalled that "mildly" antisemitic jokes were common in Schoenberg's home, which Julie Brown contextualized as "unexceptional". Schoenberg was confronted with antisemitism in reading Otto Weininger and Wagner, with whose "possible Jewish lineage" he repeatedly engaged. He experienced it on family holiday at Mattsee in summer 1921, sparking his return to Judaism. He expected it at the Bauhaus: in 1923 Wassily Kandinsky wrote him, "I reject you as a Jew. ... Better to be a human being"; Schoenberg famously asked Kandinsky, "what is anti-Semitism to lead to if not to acts of violence?"[116]
^The transcript of The Path to the New Music went unpublished until 1960 to avoid "expos[ing] Webern to serious consequences".[122]
^From 1928 onward, Webern grew closer to Krenek, alongside whom he lectured, whose music (taking a twelve-tone turn) he conducted, and with whom he, Berg, and Adorno shared concerns about the future.[124]
^An Austrian Gauleiter on Bayerischer Rundfunk named Berg and Webern as Jewish composers in 1933.[127] Berg wrote Adorno of prior instances,[128] and the Reichskulturkammer referred to Berg as an "émigré musical Jew" in Die Musik following Erich Kleiber's 1935 Berlin premiere of Berg's Lulu Suite.[129] Conversely, when Berg wrote in 1933 seeking an academic position for Adorno to emigrate to England, Edward Dent declined on the basis of protectionism and underfunding,[130] dubbing Berg "Hitlerian": "You [note in Berg's hand: '(The Jews?)'] are indeed Hitlerians, as you consider Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Holland, Scandinavia, Czechoslovakia and perhaps even England as belonging to 'Germany'!!!"[131]
^As part of the Reichsmusiktage, Webern's photograph was exhibited with the note, "this 'master student' of Arnold Schoenberg outdoes his training even in the length of his nose."[133]
^He was responding to Krenek's essay "Freiheit und Verantwortung" ("Freedom and Responsibility") in Willi Reich [de]'s 23 – Eine Wiener Musikzeitschrift (1934). Elsewhere Krenek advocated for "a Catholic Austrian avante garde", opposing "the Austrian provincialism that National Socialism wants to force on us."[134] German Wikisource has original text related to this article: 23 – Eine Wiener Musikzeitschrift.
^Only guest conductor Otto Klemperer's status sufficed to overcome their refusal, and even then, the entire orchestra abruptly walked off stage afterward, leaving Krasner, Klemperer, and Arnold Rosé to stand alone. Rosé, retired, had returned to pay his respects to the late Berg as honorary concertmaster.[136]
^Webern's only son Peter was an avid Austrian National Socialist. His eldest daughter Amalie married businessman Gunter Waller, who joined the Nazi Party as a business formality. His youngest daughter Christine married Kreisleiter and Schutzstaffel member Benno Mattl, "little liked by the family", in Jun. 1938.[141] His middle daughter Maria Halbich almost emigrated with a man "of Jewish origin". She and Webern's wife Wilhelmine "Minna" Mörtl were wary of Hitler and the Nazis. Webern avoided politics at home.[142]
^Webern told Krasner, "Schoenberg, had he not been a Jew, would have been quite different!"[139] For Bailey Puffett, this likely referred to Schoenberg's politics,[143] which were vaguely conservative and German nationalist, then Zionist.
^Composers' correspondence was conducted with some regard to the possibility of later publication, especially after the nineteenth century. Accounts were often self-admittedly perspectival.
^Tito M. Tonietti similarly observed of Schoenberg's reception history: "The many aspects of his complex life and artistic personality have ... been drastically simplified and isolated from their context. There has been a tendency to prefer only one, the most in line with the thesis that the writer wished to demonstrate. ... Schönberg has unfortunately not been understood ... [but] used ... for ... controversy ..., for ... purpose ... ."[160]
^List ventured that "[n]ationalist ideas may have saved [Webern] from the concentration camp".[167] Dissent was punishable under the Heimtückegesetz.[168]
^Goldschmidt reported that Webern was called "Kapellmeister Zig-Zag", perhaps at the Berlin Philharmonic.[91]
^In 1936, Webern insisted that he and Krasner travel through Nazi Germany and stop at a Munich train station café to show Krasner that antisemitism posed no real danger.[179] Krasner reflected in 1987 that "Jews ... were at the center of the difficulty" but that he himself had been "foolhardy" as to the full potential of antisemitism.[180] For example, when revisiting Vienna in 1941 to help friends (e.g., Schoenberg's daughter Gertrude, her husband Felix Greissle) emigrate, only Krasner's US passport saved him from locals and police.[181] The Frankfurt School initially tended to treat antisemitism within the rubric of class conflict, and Adorno began to consider it in broader terms only in his 1939 Wagner study fragments.[182] Since August Bebel's 1893 definition of antisemitism as the "socialism of fools", consensus had emerged on the center, left, and in some mainstream Jewish organizations that antisemitism was only a means to political power.[183] Before revising his 1942 Behemoth in 1944, Franz Neumann had contended that the Nazis would "never allow a complete extermination of the Jews".[183]
^Austrian pan-Germans, Grossdeutschen, or Deutschnationalisten hoped for stable prosperity via some form of Greater German nation-state like the Reich.[186] This hope was shared by some Social Democrats and was not alien to Social Christians.[187] The Greater German People's Party received a maximum of 17% of the vote during 1919–1933 elections, mostly from students, teachers, and civil servants.[188] They were most popular in Styria and Carinthia.[189] First they governed with the Social Christians.[190] Austrian Nazis won their parliamentary seats by 1933.[191] That year they joined forces with the Social Democrats.[192] They had Nazi affinity, though not identity, as of 1934.[193] Schuschnigg described Hitler's plans for Austria as "pan-German" in 1936.[194]
^Deteriorating German-Austrian relations and Austrian weakening were marked by terror, the July Putsch, and assassinations (including Engelbert Dollfuss's).[196]
^Otto Bauer, in exile, expressed some acceptance with profound resignation and misgivings, having worked toward Austria's German incorporation since Provisional National Assembly's 1918 vote.[198]
^His arrangement of two of Schubert's German Dances was performed in Leipzig and broadcast in the Reich and Fascist Italy (1941).[214]
^Webern's immediate reply (March 1940) was: "I ... with reference ... to my ... experiences ... wondered how such opposites could have become possible next to each other."[222]
^In the tradition of parties seeking a dues-paying mass membership, formal NSDAP affiliation could oblige one to pay registration fees or dues, or even to labor.[228] Nazis dissuaded some prospective members from formal affiliation as a strategic matter.[229]
^Schoenberg was unable to secure Görgi's emigration despite many attempts. Between the Russian–German language barrier and Nazi munitions and propaganda in the apartment's storeroom, Görgi was held and nearly executed as a Nazi spy but was able to convince a German-speaking Jewish officer otherwise. Görgi and his family remained there until 1969.[236]
^Webern had not set Rilke's work since Op. 8.[241] Schoenberg dedicated a 1915 setting of Rilke's "Alle, welche dich suchen", Op. 22/ii, to Webern.[242]
^Webern repeatedly emphasized Zusammenhang, translated as unity, coherence, or connection. Jonathan Kramer wrote that Webern's definition of unity was "utmost relatedness" and that he sought "to develop everything else from one principal idea!"[246] Kramer noted that most prior music and theory shared Webern's emphasis.[247] But Webern's zeal and rigor fit more with twentieth-century modernism, and his approach added complexity, Kramer argued.[248]Sibelius was also noted for his organicism and natural topics. British concert programs posed him as an alternative to the Second Viennese School.[249] Adorno and Leibowitz criticized him.[250]
^Taruskin noted Webern's "descent from Mahler".[252] Keith Fitch glossed Webern as "crystallized Mahler". The opening of Webern's Op. 21 echoed that of Mahler's Ninth.[253]
^Webern engaged with Bach in two phases, first as a student.[255] Later, he conducted Bach's music ten times (1927–1935), finding inspiration in it while writing his twelve-tone music.[256] He made some connections between his and Bach's music to make his own more easily understandable and to emphasize his place in established tradition.[257] Webern cited the two-movement (overture–dance suite) form of Bach's orchestral suites as one model for the two-movement form of his Op. 21 (writing to Schoenberg),[258] the instrumentation of the Brandenburg Concertos as inspiration for that of his Op. 24 (writing to Hertzka),[259] and Bach's B-minor badinerie as the model for the Op. 27/ii scherzo (in coaching Peter Stadlen).[260] Writing to Stein, Webern confirmed (as Polnauer had already noticed) that the BACH motif was the motivic basis of his Op. 28, but "secretly ... never ... in this ostentatious transposition!!!"[261] He asked Stein not to publicize this in Tempo.[262] In the same letter, Webern also outlined a complex synthesis of musical forms in Op. 28/iii, specifically identifying Bach's influence in the fugal element.[263]
^Webern often referred to the Franco-Flemish School as "the Netherlanders." In Feb. 1905 Webern recorded in his diary, "Mahler pointed out ... Rameau ... Bach, Brahms, and Wagner as ... contrapuntalists ... . '... Just as in nature the entire universe has developed from the primeval cell ... beyond to God ... so also in music should a large structure develop [entirely] from a single motive ... .' Variation is ... most important ... . A theme [must] be ... beautiful ... to make its unaltered return ... . ... [M]usicians [should] combine ... contrapuntal skill ... with ... melodiousness".[267] In Jan. 1931, Schoenberg responded to Webern's plan for lectures: "... show the logical development towards twelve-tone composition. ... [T]he Netherlands School, Bach for counterpoint, Mozart for phrase formation [and] motivic treatment, Beethoven [and] Bach for development, Brahms, and ... Mahler for varied and highly complex treatment. ... [T]itle ... : 'The path to twelve-tone composition.'"[268]J. Peter Burkholder generalized his claim that "the use of existing music as a basis for new music is pervasive in all periods";[269] he had focused on "the historicist mainstream" within the proximal eighteenth and especially nineteenth and twentieth centuries.[270]Adriaan Peperzak, writing about the taste of "most intellectuals" at the end of the 20th century as "a plurality of cultural homes" (or about "the 'modern museum of cultures'"),[271] stressed a general connection between new and old represented also in music (i.e., both "after" and beforetonality or common practice), observing that "whereas certain works of Bartók and Stravinsky already are experienced as difficult," "Josquin des Prez, Gesualdo, Webern and Boulez seem to be reserved to a small elite, and we continue to refer to traditional art in learning how to compose new works and how to listen to the extraordinary works made according to non-traditional codes."[272]
^For example, his first use of twelve-tone technique in Op. 17, Nos. 2 and 3, was more technical than stylistic, and Adorno felt that Op. 14 sounded twelve-tone.[273]
^Their instrumental music has been related to vocal idioms: the "concealed vocality" and "latent opera" of Berg's Lyric Suite[277] and the Bach chorale and folk melody of his Violin Concerto; the "recitative" of Schoenberg's Op. 16/v and the accentedmusical prose of his twelve-tone music. Unlike Berg and Schoenberg, Webern did not use Hauptstimmen and Nebenstimmen, but he endorsed textures of accompanied melody in his music's polyphony. He could not stop writing songs, he told Berg (1921) and Hertzka (1927), noting his work's "almost exclusively lyrical nature" and apologizing to Hertzka for the consequently inauspicious commercial implications.[278]
^Berg endorsed an innovative, pluralist approach emphasizing some bel canto and like Webern, expressed faith in singers to execute challenging lines.[283]
^Eliahu Inbal, whose work with the hr-Sinfonieorchester in the 1980s was part of a Bruckner reappraisal,[296] found additional connections between Bruckner and Webern and Romantics and modernists more generally,[297] echoing Dika Newlin and Mahler himself.
^Op. 11/iii (mid-1909) so differed from Op. 11/i–ii (Feb. 1909) that when Bartók performed Op. 11 (23 Apr. 1921 Budapest, 4 Apr. 1922 Paris), he omitted it.[323]
^"Ecstasy was [Webern's] natural state of mind", Stein recalled.[331]
^For Adorno, these were an "essential" Mahlerian formal "genre", often episodic as in a section of music marked senza tempo. Korte compared Webern's Op. 10/iii to the passage before Mahler's "Chorus mysticus".
^Beethoven's similar use of registral expansion was noted (e.g., Op. 111, No. 2, Var. 5 when the theme re-emerges in a strange harmonic context after a long section of trills).
^Examples included the circling ostinati of Op. 6/v and the end of Op. 15/v.
^See Sprechgesang. Schoenberg briefly directed and wrote for the Überbrettl, for example, in the 1901 Brettl-Lieder.
^Examples included passacaglia in "Nacht", fugue in "Der Mondfleck", and canon in both.
^Examples included the virtuoso solo and waltz in "Serenade" and triadic harmony in "O alter Duft".
^"[God ... lifts you] mercifully into that better life"
^In Apr. 1914, after Op. 22/i, "Seraphita," so wrote Schoenberg to Alma Mahler.[343]
^Scholarship varied as to the genesis of Jakobsleiter. Joseph Auner noted a scherzo fragment dated May 1914.[344] Schoenberg told Berg about setting Strindberg's Jacob lutte in spring 1911. Webern introduced Schoenberg to Balzac's Louis Lambert and Séraphîta in Mar. 1911.[345]
^"Ob rechts, ob links, vorwärts oder rückwärts, bergauf oder bergab – man hat weiterzugehen, ohne zu fragen, was vor oder hinter einem liegt."[346]
^In 1941 Schoenberg lectured: "the ... law of the unity of musical space demands an absolute and unitary perception. In this space, as in Swedenborg's heaven (described in Balzac's Séraphîta) there is no absolute down, no right or left, forward or backward." Schoenberg then considered Jakobsleiter a "real twelve-tone composition" for its opening hexachordal ostinato and "Scherzo ... of all the twelve tones".[347]
^Schoenberg hinted at the idea in Harmonielehre (1911).[352]
^Among six non-vocal drafts and sketches were an abandoned string quartet (1917–1918); seventeen measures of music scored for clarinet, trumpet, and violin (1920); and four twelve-tone fragments.[363]
^Webern wrote, "What you see here (retrograde, canon, etc.—it is always the same) is not to be thought of as "Kunststückerln" [artistic tricks]—that would be ridiculous!"[367]
^viz. the String Trio, Op. 20; Symphony, Op. 21; Quartet, Op. 22; Concerto, Op. 24; Variations for Piano, Op. 27; String Quartet, Op. 28; and Variations for Orchestra, Op. 30[368]
^Webern understood his own (and Mahler's) work as crystallizations of personal experience.[370] He wrote Berg in 1912 that an experience would occupy him until it became music "that quite decidedly had to do with the experience—often down to the details".[371] He wrote Schoenberg in 1910 that "[Mahler's symphonies] must be most closely connected with his inner experiences. I also see a development: from the most intense worship of nature to an ever more spiritual, more detached content. ... This ... abstraction ... is more important for me ... than ... techni[que]."[372]
^The Anninger to which Webern referred was a hill in the Vienna Woods above Mödling that he enjoyed hiking and wrote about in his diary, including while working on Op. 22.[373]
^viz. the Drei Gesänge, Op. 23; Drei Lieder, Op. 25; Das Augenlicht, Op. 26; Cantata No. 1, Op. 29; and Cantata No. 2, Op. 31[377]
^First by hexachordal aggregation in its center; second in a registrally expansive, open voicing at the end.
^In 2013, the Moldenhauers' dogged investigation into Webern's death and the experiences and testimony of those involved were portrayed in a one-act opera, The Death of Webern, which, though written in the eclectic style of its composer Michael Dellaira, paraphrases and quotes from Webern's music (e.g., the Passacaglia, Op. 1 in the third and final scenes, Klangfarbenmelodie in the sixth scene).
^For example, Op. 28's BACH motif (1938) and Op. 29/i, "Zündender Lichtblitz", (1938–1939, orch. 1944) troubled some commentators.
^This is Krasner's phrase, by which he interpreted Schoenberg's "those who tried might have succeeded in confounding us" as referring to Webern.[414] But Douglas Jarman noted Schoenberg's discomfort with and Stein's (and later Cerha's and Perle's) defense of Berg after the Jewish banker scene in Act III of Lulu.[415] When Schoenberg asked Webern about his feelings toward the Nazis, Webern replied, "Who dares to come between you and me?" When Eduard Steuermann asked Krasner on behalf of Schoenberg, Krasner soothed Schoenberg with a self-described lie. Schoenberg's 1934 (or 1935)–1936 Violin Concerto kept its dedication to Webern, though worded very simply ("to Anton von Webern"), whether due to Schoenberg's suspicions or to protect Webern from danger or Nazi suspicion. Schoenberg and Webern continued to correspond at least through 1939.[416]
^Schoenberg prepared his statement for publication as a handwritten inscription by facsimile reproduction in Leibowitz's 1948 didactic score of Webern's then unpublished Op. 24,[417] which Webern dedicated to Schoenberg in 1934 for his sixtieth birthday.
^Or possibly Craft, who often ghostwrote for Stravinsky.
^Olin Downes described Op. 28 as "Dead End music" in 1941.[443] Another critic wrote in 1929: "If modernism depended for progress upon the Weberns, it would get nowhere."[444]
^Adorno advocated for the completion of Lulu, writing that it "reveals the extent of its quality the longer and more deeply one immerses oneself in it". Boulez conducted the 1979 première after Cerha's orchestration.
^Robert Fink described a "general disciplinary crisis". In new musicology and postmodernism, canons were questioned, and pluralism was promoted. Lawrence Kramer and Susan McClary emphasized musical meaning. Taruskin criticized the canon's Eurocentrism, Germanism (especially in Schoenberg's, Webern's, and Dahlhaus's work), and colonialism.
^In relation to post-Webernism more generally, Holzer slammed attempts "to place Darmstadt in a fascistoid corner or even identifying it as a US propaganda institution amid the Cold War" ("Darmstadt in ein 'faschistoides' Eck zu stellen oder es gar als Propagandainstitution der USA im Kalten Krieg auszuweisen") via "unbelievable distortions, exaggerations, reductions and propagation of clichés" ("unglaublichen Verdrehungen, Übertreibungen, Verkürzungen und Propagierungen von Klischeebildern").[482]
^In a survey of five prestigious British and French orchestras, his music was played 121 times[488] and Beethoven’s 1,198 times between 1967 and 2017.[489] In a US orchestra survey of the "top 100 composers in terms of works performed", his music was played 175 times and Mozart's 7,103 times between 2000 and 2009.[490]
^"[A]tonal music is [like] random notes" in its macroharmony, Dmitri Tymoczko suggested as one reason.[495] Building on Tymoczko's work, Joshua Ballance described Webern's Opp. 1–31 partly in its macroharmonies, emphasizing the already totally chromatic macroharmonies of the pre-dodecaphonic mid-period Lieder.[496] J. Kramer believed such music as Webern's required the listener to learn more about it in order to understand it and noted that only some listeners did.[497] In this sense, he wrote, it is elitist music.[498] While he asserted that Schoenberg and Stravinsky were "generally understood to be well within the cultural mainstream" by contrast to avant-garde radicals like Satie, Henry Cowell, or Luigi Russolo,[499] he considered that Ives and Webern straddled radical and progressive sensibilities.[500] He also noted that modernism fared better in Europe than in the US, which he ascribed to differences in education and also to the commercialization of increasingly unsubsidized art music particularly in the US.[501]
^J. Kramer noted that audiences gradually became less shocked and more indifferent, at least in the US.[503]
^"Don't write music entirely by ear", Webern told Searle: "Your ears will always guide you ... but you must know why" (emphasis in original).[507] Webern's music was associated with "intellectual order".[504] He innovated musically and conceptually, challenging audiences.[508] Julian Johnson argued that criticisms of composers' innovations were a "constant of musical modernity for four hundred years", from il nuove musiche to die neue Musik. He quoted Girolamo Mei writing to Vincenzo Galilei in 1572: "[N]ot to appear ... inferior ... these musicians precipitated themselves at breakneck speed ... to discover always new styles and new forms of song [which] were not understood [or] felt".[509] Mei wrote Galilei that in these innovations composers followed their ears, not their intellects.[510]
^For J. Peter Burkholder, musical historicism as a mainstream intellectual tradition proper began in Brahms's generation's l'art pour l'art and more introverted musical experience. It intensified in Schoenberg's generation with increasing engagement with stylistic history as impetus to compositional innovation. Distantly and obliquely echoing Charles Burney's work, it flowered amid Hegelianism and theories of biological and social evolution or progress. Burkholder distinguished between more progressive historicism (Schoenberg's Erwartung), more emulative cases (Strauss's Ariadne auf Naxos), and mixed examples (Berg's Wozzeck). He noted the assimilation of peripheral nationalmusic traditions for novelty but emphasized that innovation occurred even within those contexts.[511]
^Burkholder and Lydia Goehr, among others, traced the history of orchestras' (and other institutions') museum-like function in producing and presenting "civilized", "elite", or "important" (if sometimes "difficult", "serious", or "unpopular") music as artwork, not without regard to audiences.[513]
^The others, in both cases, were Bartók, Berg, Schoenberg, and Stravinsky.[514] In Joseph N. Straus's account of how modernists recast tradition,[515] they were "the exemplars" on whom he focused.[516]Ensemble intercontemporain played them often at Boulez's IRCAM as "classics" in the 1980s, which Georgina Born argued contributed to their canonization.[517] In considering the US context, J. Kramer wrote that Bartók, Stravinsky, and especially Schoenberg and Webern were not often played or widely understood but nonetheless backed as central to canon of 20th-century classical music in terms of theory and analysis by academics with a shared perspective (who constituted a significant plurality of composers).[518] He considered Schoenberg, Stravinsky, and Webern "quintessential modernists of the early twentieth century".[503]
^For Taruskin, pitch sets did not "conform to the physics of sound", and "optimism about human adaptability ... is the same ... that drives all utopian thinking."[521]
^J. Kramer characterized early modernists (e.g., Schoenberg, Stravinsky, and Webern) and even the early modernist avant-garde (e.g., Satie, Cowell, Russolo, Edgar Varèse) as "trapped" in continuous historical development.[523] Seeing themselves as innovators entailed both conceiving of history as linear progress and rejecting prior concepts of music, he explained.[523] Modernists engaged and competed with the dominant music of the past, which they reinvented.[524]
^For Taruskin, "the legacy of fascism is an inseparable ... facet of the lofty legacy of modernism".[527] Krasner told Fanfare Webern "packed me off quickly" upon the Anschluss "for my safety but perhaps ... to avoid ... embarrassment ... had his family arrived, or friends celebrating ... Nazi entry".[174] Taruskin cited Krasner to claim Webern joyfully welcomed the Nazis upon the Anschluss.[528] In his "How Talented Composers Become Useless" postscript, Taruskin wrote, "The Nazis had every right to criticize Schoenberg ... . It is not for their criticism that we all revile them."[529] He compared Leibowitz to Goebbels, found "Nazi resonances" in Eimert's "only composers who follow Webern are worthy of the name," and likened Boulez's "[s]ince the Viennese discoveries, any musician who has not experienced ... the necessity of dodecaphonic language is USELESS" to the Zhdanov Doctrine.[530]
^"Of all in the volumes in this series," Taruskin referred to his Oxford History, "this one, covering the first half of the twentieth century, surely differs the most radically from previous accounts".[532]
^Rosen charged Taruskin's "hostile presentation ... does not result in historical objectivity".[480] Max Erwin considered Taruskin's work on the Darmstädter Ferienkurse "passionately negative"[534] and "thoroughly discredited",[535] particularly that "Adorno or Leibowitz officiated with near-dictatorial power".[536] Rodney Lister wrote, "Taruskin's purpose ... is to bury Webern, not to praise him", noting "the increasing importance of 'motivization' over the course of the 19th century and of the 'collapse' of (traditional) tonality [is] something which Taruskin flatly states never took place."[537] Larson Powell found "Taruskin's ... references to Webern's politics ... to discredit the music."[538]Christian Utz [de] agreed with Martin Zenck [de] that Taruskin's claims were "simplifying and distorting", granting "authoritarian rhetoric ... in ... the 1950s and 60s" and the nonexistence of "'apolitical music'".[539] Holzer also sympathized with but found Taruskin inappropriate and simplistic.[540]
^In a case study, Martin Kaltenecker noted Taruskin's taking aim at avant-garde prestige in opposition to Célestin Deliège [fr]'s Cinquante ans de modernité musicale: De Darmstadt à l'IRCAM.[543] He contrasted their polarized nomothetic "plots" with more idiographic approaches' "juxtapositions" and thick description. He considered how to move beyond this nomothetic–idiographic historiographical dichotomy.[544]
^Johnson described music in modernity as "broken off from the past", "broken in itself", and "of individual subjectivity". It no longer "elaborate[s] ... divine unity", by contrast to medieval music, but "rema[d]e it", he argued, "as Wagner's Siegfried ... from ... his father's sword, or as Webern piece[d] together ... atomized ... interval[s]."[548]
^For Johnson, modernism foregrounded the "brokenness that always lay at the heart of the pastoral".[551] Thomas Peattie wrote about brokenness in Mahler's pastoral music.[552]
Adlington, Robert. 2019. "Modernism: the people's music?". The Routledge Research Companion to Modernism in Music, eds. and intro. Björn Heile [et] and Charles Wilson, 216–238. London: Routledge. ISBN978-1-315-61329-1 (ebk). ISBN978-1-4724-7040-9 (hbk).
Allen-Russell, Ann van. 2023. "'Not like Pyrates': Borrowing, Copyright and Creativity in the Eighteenth Century". Music Borrowing and Copyright Law: A Genre-by-Genre Analysis, eds. and intro. Enrico Bonadio and Chen Zhu, fwd. Paul J. Heald, 191–208. Oxford: Bloomsbury. ISBN978-1-50994-940-3 (ePDF). ISBN978-1-50994-939-7 (ePub). ISBN978-1-50994-938-0 (hbk).
Adamson, Walter L. 2003. "Modernism in art, literature and political theory". The Cambridge History of Twentieth-Century Political Thought, eds. and intro. Terence Ball and Richard Bellamy, 412–430. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN978-0-521-56354-3.
Adorno, Theodor W. and Alban Berg. 2005. Correspondence 1925–1935, ed. Henri Lonitz, trans. Wieland Hoban. Cambridge, UK and Malden, MA: Polity Press. ISBN978-0-7456-2336-8. (Trans. of Briefwechsel 1925–1935. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1997.)
Ahrend, Thomas and Stefan Münnich. 2018. "Anton Webern." In Oxford Bibliographies Online in Music. 2018. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/obo/9780199757824-0238 (accessed 1 Oct. 2023).
Alegant, Brian. 2010. The Twelve-tone Music of Luigi Dallapiccola. Eastman Studies in Music, sen. ed. Ralph P. Locke. Rochester: University of Rochester Press. ISBN978-1-58046-325-6 (hbk).
Andriessen, Louis. 2002. "Lectures for Young Composers". The Music of Louis Andriessen, ed. and pref. Maja Trochimczyk, gen. intro. Joseph Auner, 131–160. Studies in Contemporary Music and Culture Series. New York: Routledge. ISBN978-1-136-76966-5.
Andriessen, Louis and Maja Trochimczyk. 2002. "Dialog 1: Learning". The Music of Louis Andriessen, ed. and pref. Maja Trochimczyk, gen. intro. Joseph Auner, 3–30. Studies in Contemporary Music and Culture Series. New York: Routledge. ISBN978-1-136-76966-5.
Antokoletz, Elliott. 2014. A History of Twentieth-Century Music in a Theoretic–Analytical Context. New York: Routledge. ISBN978-0-415-88187-6 (hbk).
Antokoletz, Elliott, and Paolo Susanni. 2011. Béla Bartók: A Research and Information Guide, 3rd ed. New York, NY: Routledge. ISBN978-0-203-88889-6.
Arnold, Ben (ed.). 2002. The Liszt Companion. Jazz Companions Series. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. ISBN978-0-313-30689-1 (accessed 9 Aug. 2014).
Arnold Schönberg Center. n.d. "Concerto for Violin and Orchestra Op. 36". Werk- und Quellendatenbank: Werke mit Opuszahlen (op. 26–50c). Vienna: Arnold Schönberg Center (accessed 9 Aug. 2014).
Auner, Joseph. 1999. "The Second Viennese School as a Historical Concept." In Schoenberg, Berg, and Webern: A Companion to the Second Viennese School, ed. Bryan R. Simms, 1–36. Westport and London: Greenwood Press. ISBN978-0-313-29604-8.
Auner, Joseph. 2003. A Schoenberg Reader. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN978-0-300-12712-6.
Babbitt, Milton. 2003. "The Composer as Specialist." In The Collected Essays of Milton Babbitt, ed. Stephen Peles, with Stephen Dembski, Andrew Mead, and Joseph N. Straus, 48–54. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. ISBN978-0-691-15540-1.
Bailey Puffett, Kathryn. 2001. "Webern, Anton." Grove Music Online (accessed 9 Oct. 2022).
Bailey Puffett, Kathryn. 1991. The Twelve-Note Music of Anton Webern: Old Forms in a New Language. Music in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN978-0-521-39088-0 (hbk). ISBN978-0-521-54796-3 (pbk).
Bailey Puffett, Kathryn and Barbara Schingnitz. 2020. Three Men of Letters: Arnold Schönberg, Alban Berg and Anton Webern, 1906-1921, pref. and trans. Kathryn Bailey Puffett and Barbara Schingnitz. Vienna: Hollitzer. ISBN978-3-99012-777-3.
Baragwanath, Nicholas. 1999. "Alban Berg, Richard Wagner, and Leitmotivs of Symmetry." 19th-century Music 23(1):62–83.
Baranello, Micaela. 2021. The Operetta Empire: Music Theater in Early Twentieth-Century Vienna. Oakland: University of California Press. ISBN978-0-520-97654-2 (ebk). ISBN978-0-520-37912-1 (hbk).
Barker, Paul. 2004. Composing for Voice: A Guide for Composers, Singers, and Teachers. New York: Routledge. Reprinted 2014. ISBN978-1-136-72337-7.
Barthel-Calvet, Anne-Sylvie and Christopher Brent Murray. 2023. "Revisiting the Old Stories of New Music". Introduction: Revisiting the Historiography of Postwar Avant-Garde Music, eds. Anne-Sylvie Barthel-Calvet and Christopher Brent Murray, 1–12. Oxford: Routledge. ISBN978-1-315-10816-2 (ebk). ISBN978-1-138-09120-7 (hbk). ISBN978-1-032-31004-6 (pbk). doi:10.4324/9781315108162-1.
Beller, Steven. 2006. A Concise History of Austria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN978-0-511-98994-0.
Berg, Alban. 1957. Écrits, ed. and trans. Henri Pousseur. Monaco: Editions du Rocher. Enlarged edition, ed. Dominique Jameaux et al., Paris: Christian Bourgois, 1985.
Berger, Peter. 2003. "The League of Nations and Interwar Austria: Critical Assessment of a Partnership in Economic Reconstruction". The Dollfuss/Schuschnigg Era in Austria: A Reassessment, eds. Günter Bischof, Anton Pelinka, and Alexander Lassner, 73–92. Vol. 11, Contemporary Austrian Studies. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers. ISBN978-0-7658-0970-4 (pbk).
Berry, Mark. 2008. "Arnold Schoenberg's 'Biblical Way': From 'Die Jakobsleiter' to 'Moses und Aron'." Music & Letters 89(1):84–108.
Born, Georgina. 1995. Rationalizing Culture: IRCAM, Boulez, and the Institutionalization of the Musical Avant-Garde. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN978-0-520-08507-7 (hbk).
Botstein, Leon. 2010. "Alban Berg and the Memory of Modernism." In Alban Berg and His World, ed. Christopher Hailey, 299–344. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN978-0-691-14855-7 (hbk). ISBN978-0-691-14856-4 (pbk).
Bregegere, Andre. 2014. "L'harmonie revée: An Analysis of Henri Pousseur's Votre Faust and Les litanies d'Icare". PhD diss. New York: City University of New York.
Brown, Julie. 2011. "Understanding Schoenberg as Christ". The Oxford Handbook of the New Cultural History of Music, ed. Jane F. Fulcher, 117–162. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN978-0-199-35409-2.
Brown, Julie. 1998. "[Review:] Anne C. Shreffler's Webern and the Lyric Impulse: Songs and Fragments on Poems of Georg Trakl and Kathryn Bailey's Webern Studies". Music and Letters 79(1):144–150. doi:10.1093/ml/79.1.144.
Broyles, Michael. 2004. Mavericks and Other Traditions in American Music. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN978-0-300-10045-7 (hbk).
Bukey, Evan Burr. 2019. Juvenile Crime and Dissent in Nazi Vienna, 1938–1945. London: Bloomsbury. ISBN978-1-350-13262-7 (ebk).
Burkholder, J. Peter. 2006. "The Twentieth Century and the Orchestra as Museum". The Orchestra: A Collection of 23 Essays on Its Origins and Transformations, ed. and intro. Joan Peyser, 409–432. Milwaukee: Hal Leonard Corporation. Reprint from original in 1986 by Charles Scribners Sons. ISBN978-1-423-41026-3.
Busoni, Ferruccio. 1987. Ferruccio Busoni: Selected Letters, ed., trans., and intro. Antony Beaumont. New York: Columbia University Press.
Clampitt, David. 2009. "Webern's Music for String Quartet." In Intimate Voices: The Twentieth-Century String Quartet, Vol. 1: From Debussy to Villa-Lobos, ed. Evan Jones, 195–220. Rochester: University of Rochester Press. ISBN978-1-58046-229-7.
Czerwińska-Schupp, Ewa. 2016. Otto Bauer (1881–1938): Thinker and Politician, trans. Maciej Żurowski. Vol. 121, Historical Materialism Book Series. Leiden and Boston: Brill. 2016. ISBN978-90-04-32583-8 (ebk). ISBN978-90-04-31573-0 (hbk). Translation of Otto Bauer: Studien zur social-politischen Philosophie, Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 2005.
Decroupet, Pascal. 2023. "Continuity in the Creative Auto-Genealogies of Boulez, Stockhausen, Pousseur, and Nono", trans. Christopher Brent Murray. Revisiting the Historiography of Postwar Avant-Garde Music, eds. and intro. Anne-Sylvie Barthel-Calvet and Christopher Brent Murray, 37–63. Oxford: Routledge. ISBN978-1-315-10816-2 (ebk). ISBN978-1-138-09120-7 (hbk). ISBN978-1-032-31004-6 (pbk). doi:10.4324/9781315108162-3.
Doctor, Jennifer. 1999. The BBC and Ultra-Modern Music, 1922–1936: Shaping a Nation's Tastes.
Dolan, Emily and Alexander Rehding, eds. 2021. The Oxford Handbook of Timbre. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN978-0-19-063725-5 (ebk). ISBN978-0-19-063722-4 (hbk).
Ehman, Caroline. 2013. "Reimagining Faust in Postmodern Opera". PhD diss. Rochester: Eastman School of Music, University of Rochester.
Eichner, Barbara. 2012. History in Mighty Sounds: Musical Constructions of German National Identity, 1848–1914. Music in Society and Culture 1. Boydell Press. ISBN978-1-84383-754-1.
Elliott, Martha. 2007. Singing in Style: A Guide to Vocal Performance Practices. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN978-0-300-10932-0.
Emmery, Laura. 2020. Compositional Process in Elliott Carter's String Quartets: A Study in Sketches. Ashgate Studies in Theory and Analysis of Music After 1900. London and New York: Routledge. ISBN978-0-367-15132-4 (hbk). ISBN978-0-429-05525-6 (ebk).
Erwin, Max Owen. 2019. "Ghosts in the Machine: The Making of European Serialism, 1945–1955". PhD thesis. Leeds: University of Leeds School of Music.
Erwin, Max Owen. 2020. "Who is Buried in Webern's Tomb? Orientations in the Reception of Serial Music from Messiaen to Stockhausen." Perspectives of New Music 58(2):93–128.
Erwin, Max Owen. 2021. "An Apprenticeship and Its Stocktakings: Leibowitz, Boulez, Messiaen, and the Discourse and Practice of New Music." Twentieth-Century Music 18(1):71–93.
Feldman, Morton. 2000. Give My Regards to Eighth Street: Collected Writings of Morton Feldman, ed. and intro. BH Friedman, afterword Frank O'Hara. Cambridge, MA: Exact Change. ISBN978-1-878972-31-6.
Fosler-Lussier, Danielle. 2007. Music Divided: Bartók's Legacy in Cold War Culture, Vol. 7. Los Angeles: University of California Press. ISBN978-0-520-24965-3.
Fraser, [Catherine] Stacey. 2003. "Webern and Mozart. Two of a Kind?" [Lecture and Recital]. PhD thesis. San Diego: University of California, San Diego.
Frigyesi, Judith. 1998. Béla Bartók and Turn-of-the-Century Budapest. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN978-0-520924-58-1
Fulbrook, Mary. 2011. A History of Germany 1918–2008: The Divided Nation, 3rd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN978-1-4443-5972-5
Goehr, Lydia. 1992. The Imaginary Museum of Musical Works: An Essay in the Philosophy of Music. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN978-0-19-823541-5 (hbk).
Goeyvaerts, Karel. 1994. "Paris: Darmstadt 1947–1956: Excerpt from the Autobiographical Portrait", trans. Patrick Daly, Peter Vosch, and Roger Janssens. Revue belge de Musicologie / Belgisch Tijdschrift voor Muziekwetenschap 48 (The Artistic Legacy of Karel Goeyvaerts. A Collection of Essays): 35–54.
Grant, M. J. 2001. Serial Music, Serial Aesthetics: Compositional Theory in Post-War Europe. Music in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN978-0-521-61992-9.
Hába, Alois. 1934. "Schönberg und die weiteren möglichkeiten der musikentwicklung." In Arnold Schönberg zum 60. Geburtstag, 13. September 1934, ed. Hildegard Jone, 15–17. Vienna: Universal Edition.
Haimo, Ethan. 2006. Schoenberg's Transformation of Musical Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN978-0-521-86542-5.
Hochman, Erin R. 2016. Imagining a Greater Germany: Republican Nationalism and the Idea of Anschluss. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. ISBN978-1-5017-0444-4.
Holzer, Andreas. 2019. "Darmstadt and the 'Cold War': A Contribution to the Elucidation of the Spread of 'Postfactual' Tendencies in Musicology." In Anklaenge, Wiener Jahrbuch für Musikwissenschaft, 2018: Die Musikgeschichte des 20. und 21. Jahrhunderts im universitären Unterricht, eds. Christian Glanz and Nikolaus Urbanek, 293–308. Vienna: Hollitzer. ISBN978-3-99012-617-2. doi:10.21939/imi_anklaenge2018.
Iddon, Martin. 2013. New Music at Darmstadt: Nono, Stockhausen, Cage, and Boulez. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN978-1-107-03329-0.
Jay, Martin. 1986. Permanent Exiles: Essays on the Intellectual Migration from Germany to America. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN978-0-231-06073-8
Jensen, EF. 1989. "Webern and Giovanni Segantini's Trittico della natura." The Musical Times 130(1751), 11–15. doi:10.2307/966096.
Johnson, Julian. 2006. "Berg's Operas and the Politics of Subjectivity". Music, Theatre and Politics in Germany: 1848 to the Third Reich, ed. Nikolaus Bacht, 211–236. Hants: Routledge. ISBN978-0-7546-5521-3 (hbk). ISBN978-0-19-931610-6 (pbk).
Johnson, Julian. 2006. "Anton Webern, the Social Democratic Kunstelle and Musical Modernism". Austrian Studies 14(1):197–213.
Johnson, Julian. 1999. Webern and the Transformation of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN978-0-521-66149-2.
Johnson, Julian. 1998. "The Nature of Abstraction: Analysis and the Webern Myth". Music Analysis 17(3):267–280. doi:10.2307/854416.
Johnson, Victoria. 2015. "Notes from the Underground: Explorations of Dissent in the Music of Czech-born Composers Marek Kopelent and Petr Kotík". MA thesis. Phoenix: Arizona State University.
Kaltenecker, Martin. 2023. "Recent Histories of Twentieth-Century Music and the Historiographical Tradition", trans. Christopher Brent Murray. Revisiting the Historiography of Postwar Avant-Garde Music, eds. and intro. Anne-Sylvie Barthel-Calvet and Christopher Brent Murray, 13–36. Oxford: Routledge. ISBN978-1-315-10816-2 (ebk). ISBN978-1-138-09120-7 (hbk). ISBN978-1-032-31004-6 (pbk). doi:10.4324/9781315108162-2.
Kapp, Reinhard. 1999. "Weberns Politik". Anton Webern: Persönlichkeit zwischen Kunst und Politik (Symposium Report), eds. Stefan Jena, Brigitte Grünauer, and Hartmut Krones, intro. Hartmut Krones, 51–86. Wiener Schriften zur Stilkunde und Aufführungspraxis. Vienna: Böhlau Verlag. ISBN978-3-205-99072-7.
Kater, Michael. 1999. Composers of the Nazi Era: Eight Portraits. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN978-0-19-509924-9.
Kater, Michael. 1997. The Twisted Muse: Musicians and Their Music in the Third Reich. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN978-0-19-509620-0.
Kirk, Tom. 2003. "Fascism and Austrofascism". The Dollfuss/Schuschnigg Era in Austria: A Reassessment, eds. Günter Bischof, Anton Pelinka, and Alexander Lassner, 10–31. Vol. 11, Contemporary Austrian Studies. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers. ISBN978-0-7658-0970-4 (pbk).
Kolneder, Walter. 1968. Anton Webern: An Introduction to His Works. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. Trans. Humphrey Searle. (Trans. of Anton Webern, Einführung in Werk und Stil. Rodenkirchen: P. J. Tonger, 1961.) ISBN978-0-520-34715-1.
Kozbelt, Aaron. 2016. "Process, Self-evaluation and Lifespan Creativity Trajectories in Eminent Composers". The Act of Musical Composition: Studies in the Creative Process, ed. and pref. Dave Collins, 27–52. SEMPRE Studies in The Psychology of Music, eds. and series pref. Graham Welch, Adam Ockelford, and Ian Cross. London: Routledge. ISBN978-1-4094-3425-2 (hbk). Reprint from original in 2012 by Asghate.
Krenek, Ernst. 1998. Im Atem der Zeit: Erinnerungen an die Moderne, trans. Friedrich Saathen and Sabine Schulte. Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe. ISBN978-3-455-11170-5 (hbk).
Krones, Hartmut. 1999. "Vorwort". Anton Webern: Persönlichkeit zwischen Kunst und Politik (Symposium Report), eds. Stefan Jena, Brigitte Grünauer, and Hartmut Krones, 7–8. Wiener Schriften zur Stilkunde und Aufführungspraxis. Vienna: Böhlau Verlag. ISBN978-3-205-99072-7.
Krones, Hartmut, Helmut Loos and Klaus-Peter Koc, eds. 2017. Die Rezeption der Wiener Schule in Osteuropa. Musikgeschichte in Mittel- und Osteuropa: Mitteilungen der internationalen Arbeitsgemeinschaft an der Universität Leipzig 19. Leipzig: Gudrun Schröder Verlag. ISBN978-3-926196-76-7.
Lassner, Alexander. 2003. "The Foreign Policy of the Schuschnigg Government 1934–1938: The Quest for Security". The Dollfuss/Schuschnigg Era in Austria: A Reassessment, eds. Günter Bischof, Anton Pelinka, and Alexander Lassner, 73–92. Vol. 11, Contemporary Austrian Studies. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers. ISBN978-0-7658-0970-4 (pbk).
Lee, Gavin SK. 2023. "Global Musical Modernisms as Decolonial Method". Twentieth-Century Music 20:3(424–448). doi:10.1017/S1478572223000208.
Leeuw, Ton de. 2005. Music of the Twentieth Century: A Study of Its Elements and Structure, trans. Stephen Taylor. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. ISBN978-90-5356-765-4. Trans. of Muziek van de twintigste eeuw: een onderzoek naar haar elementen en structuur. Utrecht: Oosthoek, 1964. 3rd impression, Utrecht: Bohn, Scheltema & Holkema, 1977. ISBN978-90-313-0244-4.
Leinsdorf, Erich. 1997. Erich Leinsdorf on Music. Portland: Amadeus Press. ISBN978-1-57467-028-8.
Lister, Rodney. 2006. "[Review:] The Cambridge History of Twentieth-Century Music ed. Nicholas Cook and Anthony Pople, and The Oxford History of Western Music by Richard Taruskin". Tempo. 60(235):50–57. Cambridge University Press.
Littlewood, Julian. 2004. The Variations of Johannes Brahms. London: Plumbago Books. ISBN978-0-9540123-4-2.
Maconie, Robin. 2016. Other Planets: The Complete Works of Karlheinz Stockhausen, 1950–2007. Updated edition. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN978-1-44-227268-2 (electronic).
Maes, Francis. 2002. A History of Russian Music From Kamarinskaya to Babi Yar''. Trans. Arnold J. Pomerans and Erica Pomerans. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. Trans. of Geschiedenis van de Russische muziek: Van Kamarinskaja tot Babi Jar. Nijmegen: Uitgeverij SUN, 1996. ISBN978-0-520-21815-4.
Merrick, Paul. 1987. Revolution and Religion in the Music of Liszt. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN978-0-521-32627-8.
Meyer, Felix and Anne C. Shreffler. 1996. "Performance and revision: the early history of Webern's Four Pieces for violin and piano, Op. 7". Webern Studies, ed. and intro. Kathryn Bailey Puffett, 135–169. Cambridge Composer Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN978-0-521-47526-6 (hbk).
Miller, David H. Spring 2022. "Singing Webern, Sounding Webern: Bethany Beardslee, Grace-Lynne Martin, and Marni Nixon, 1950–1957". Journal of the American Musicological Society. 75(1):81–127. University of California Press.
Morgan, Robert P. 1993. Modern Times: From World War I to the Present. Man & Music Series; Vol. 8. London: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN978-1-349-11291-3 (ebk). ISBN978-1-349-11293-7 (hbk).
Morris, Christopher. 2016. "Modernism and the Cult of Mountains: Music, Opera, Cinema". Ashgate Interdisciplinary Studies in Opera. Oxford and New York: Taylor & Francis. Reprint from original in 2012 by Ashgate. ISBN978-0-75466-970-8 (hbk).
Moskovitz, Marc. 2010. Alexander Zemlinsky: A Lyric Symphony. Woodbridge, UK: Boydell. ISBN978-1-84383-578-3.
Musgrave, Michael. 1985. The Music of Brahms. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN978-0-7100-9776-7.
Nattiez, Jean-Jacques. 2004. "Boulez Structuralist". The Battle of Chronos and Orpheus: Essays in Applied Musical Semiology, trans. Jonathan Dunsby, 72–83. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN978-0-19-816610-8.
Neubauer, John. 2001. "Organicism and Modernism / Music and Literature". Essays on the Song Cycle and on Defining the Field (Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Word and Music Studies at Ann Arbor, MI, 1999), 3–24. Vol 2., Word and Music Studies, eds. Walter Bernhart, Werner Wolf, and David Mosley. Intro. Werner Wolf. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Reprinted, Amsterdam: Brill. 2022. ISBN978-9-004488-74-8 (ebk).
Neubauer, John. 2002. "Organicist Poetics as Romantic Heritage?". Romantic Poetry. Ed. Angela Esterhammer, 491–508. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. ISBN978-9-027297-76-1.
Neubauer, John. 2009. "Organicism and Music Theory". New Paths: Aspects of Music Theory and Aesthetics in the Age of Romanticism, eds. Darla Crispin and Kathleen Snyers, 11–36. Collected Writings of the Orpheus Institute [nl]. Leuven: Leuven University Press. ISBN978-9-058677-34-1.
Notley, Margaret. 2010. "[1934, Alban Berg, and the Shadow of Politics: Documents of a Troubled Year]". Alban Berg and His World, ed. Christopher Hailey, 223–268. The Bard Music Festival. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN978-1-400836-47-5.
Obinger, Herbert [de]. 2018. "War Preparation, Warfare, and the Welfare State in Austria". Warfare and Welfare: Military Conflict and Welfare State Development in Western Countries, eds. and pref. Herbert Obinger, Klaus Petersen, and Peter Starke, 67–98. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN978-0-19-877959-9 (hbk).
Paddison, Max. 1998. Adorno's Aesthetics of Music. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN978-0-521-62608-8
Peattie, Thomas. 2012. "Reviewed Work(s): Mahler's Voices: Expression and Irony in the Songs and Symphonies by Julian Johnson". Music and Letters 93(3):422–425. doi:10.1093/ml/gcs029.
Peperzak, Adriaan. 1994. "Ethics in Our Time". The Question of Hermeneutics: Essays in Honor of Joseph J. Kockelmans, "Section V. –– Hermeneutics, Art, and Ethics", ed. and intro. Timothy J. Stapleton, fwd. Pierre Kerszberg, 451–468. Vol. 17, Contributions to Phenomenology, eds. William R. McKenna et al. Dordrecht: Springer. Reprint from original in 1994 by Kluwers. ISBN978-94-011-1160-7 (ebk). ISBN978-0-7923-2964-0 (pbk). doi:10.1007/978-94-011-1160-7.
Perle, George. 1985. The Operas of Alban Berg, Vol. II: Lulu. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN978-0-520-06616-8.
Perle, George. 1990. The Right Notes: Twenty-Three Selected Essays by George Perle on Twentieth-Century Music. Stuyvesant: Pendragon Press. ISBN978-0-945193-37-1.
Perle, George. 1995. The Listening Composer. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN978-0-520-20518-5.
Peyser, Joan. 2008. To Boulez and Beyond. Revised ed. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press. ISBN978-1-4616-9776-3.
Potter, Pamela M. 2005. "What Is 'Nazi Music'?". The Musical Quarterly 88(3):428–455. doi:10.1093/musqtl/gdi019.
Pousseur, Henri. 2009. "Harmonie? Harmonies! (1995)". Série et harmonie généralisées: une théorie de la composition musicale. Ed. Pascal Decroupet, 225–242. Collection Musique-Musicologie. Wavre: Mardaga. ISBN978-2-8047-0013-3.
Prausnitz, Frederik. 2002. Roger Sessions: How a "Difficult" Composer Got That Way. Cary, NC: Oxford University Press. ISBN978-0-19-510892-7.
Puffett, Derrick. 1996. "Gone with the Summer Wind; or, What Webern Lost: Nine Variations on a Ground". Webern Studies, ed. and intro. Kathryn Bailey Puffett, 32–73. Cambridge Composer Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN978-0-521-47526-6 (hbk).
Rochberg, George. 2004. The Aesthetics of Survival: A Composer's View of Twentieth-Century Music. Revised, expanded, and reprinted from original in 1984. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. ISBN978-0-472-02511-4 (ebk). ISBN978-0-472-03026-2 (pbk).
Rode-Breymann, Susanne. 1996. "'... gathering the divine from the earthly ...': Ferdinand Avenarius and his significance for Anton Webern's early settings of lyric poetry". Webern Studies, ed. and intro. Kathryn Bailey Puffett, 1–31. Cambridge Composer Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN978-0-521-47526-6 (hbk).
Rosen, Charles. 2012. Freedom and the Arts: Essays on Music and Literature. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press. ISBN978-0-674-04752-5
Schoenberg, Arnold. 1950. Style and Idea, ed. Dika Newlin. New York: Philosophical Library, Inc.
Schoenberg, Arnold. 2018. Schoenberg's Correspondence with American Composers, ed. and trans. Sabine Feisst. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN978-0-19-538357-7 (hbk).
Schmelz, Peter John. 2015. "Serialism in the USSR". The Cambridge Companion to Serialism, ed. Martin Iddon, 253–265. Cambridge Companions to Music Series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN978-1-108-49252-2 (hbk). ISBN978-1-108-71686-4 (pbk). doi:10.1017/9781108592116.
Schmelz, Peter John. 2009. Such Freedom, if Only Musical: Unofficial Soviet Music during the Thaw. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN978-0-19-986685-4 (ebk).
Schmusch, Rainer. 1995. "Klangfarbenmelodie." In Terminologie der Musik im 20. Jahrhundert, ed. Hans Heinrich Eggebrecht, 221–234. Handwörterbuch der musikalischen Terminologie. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag. ISBN978-3-515-06659-4.
Schuijer, Michiel. 2008. "Analyzing Atonal Music: Pitch-class Set Theory and Its Contexts". Eastman Studies in Music, sen. ed. Ralph P. Locke. Rochester: University of Rochester Press. ISBN978-1-58046-270-9 (hbk).
Schroeder, David. 1994. "Alban Berg". Schoenberg, Berg, and Webern: A Companion to the Second Viennese School, ed. Bryan R. Simms, 185–250. Westport, Connecticut and London: Greenwood Press. ISBN978-0-313-29604-8.
Schwartz, Peter J. 2017. "'Guckt euch selbst an!' Büchner's Woyzeck and the Pericope Adulterae." In Georg Büchner: Contemporary Perspectives, ed. Robert Gillett, 79–91. Leiden: Brill. ISBN978-90-04-34163-0 (ebk). ISBN978-90-04-33859-3 (hbk).
Searle, Humphrey and Anton Webern. 1940. "Conversations with Webern." The Musical Times 81(1172), 405–406. doi:10.2307/921847.
Shaftel, Matthew R. 2004. Preface. The Anton Webern Collection: Early Vocal Music, 1809–1909, ed. Matthew R. Shaftel. New York: Carl Fischer. ISBN978-0-8258-5659-4.
Shaftel, Matthew R. 2000. "Anton Webern's Early Songs: Motive, Harmony, and Influence". PhD diss. New Haven: Yale University. ISBN978-0-599-98379-3.
Shere, David Matthew. 2007. "A Survey of Webern's Life and Compositional Vocabulary". PhD diss. Santa Barbara: University of California, Santa Barbara. ISBN978-0-549-26874-1.
Shreffler, Anne C. 2002. "[Review:] Julian Johnson. Webern and the Transformation of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999". Music Theory Spectrum 24(2):294–299. doi:10.1093/mts/24.2.294.
Shreffler, Anne C. 1999. "Anton Webern". Schoenberg, Berg, and Webern: A Companion to the Second Viennese School, ed. Bryan R. Simms, 251–314. Westport, Connecticut and London: Greenwood Press. ISBN978-0-313-29604-8.
Shreffler, Anne C. 1994. Webern and the Lyric Impulse: Songs and Fragments on Poems of Georg Trakl, ed. and pref. Lewis Lockwood. Studies in Musical Genesis and Structure Series. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN978-0-19-816224-7.
Simms, Bryan R. 1999. "Arnold Schoenberg". Schoenberg, Berg, and Webern: A Companion to the Second Viennese School, ed. Bryan R. Simms, 129–184. Westport, Connecticut and London: Greenwood Press. ISBN978-0-313-29604-8.
Simms, Bryan R. 2006. "Twentieth-Century Composers Return to the Small Ensemble". The Orchestra: A Collection of 23 Essays on Its Origins and Transformations, ed. and intro. Joan Peyser, 453–474. Milwaukee: Hal Leonard Corporation. Reprint from original in 1986 by Charles Scribners Sons. ISBN978-1-423-41026-3.
Simms, Bryan R. and Charlotte Erwin. 2021. Berg. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN978-0-19-093144-5 (hbk).
Sitsky, Larry, ed. 2002. Music of the Twentieth-Century Avant-garde: A Biocritical Sourcebook, fwd. Jonathan D. Kramer. Westport, Coneecticut: Greenwood Press. ISBN978-0-313-29689-5 (pbk).
Smither, Howard E. 2001. A History of the Oratorio, Vol. 4: The Oratorio in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Chapel Hill and London: The University of North Carolina Press. ISBN978-0-807837-78-8.
Slonimsky, Nicolas. 1994. Lexicon of Musical Invective: Critical Assaults on Composers Since Beethoven's Time". 2nd ed. Seattle and London: University of Washington Press. Reprint from original in 1953 by Coleman-Ross. ISBN978-0-295-78579-0.
Stapleton, Timothy J. 1994. Introduction: The Question of Hermeneutics: Essays in Honor of Joseph J. Kockelmans, ed. Timothy J. Stapleton, fwd. Pierre Kerszberg, 1–16. Vol. 17, Contributions to Phenomenology, eds. William R. McKenna et al. Dordrecht: Springer. Reprint from original in 1994 by Kluwers. ISBN978-94-011-1160-7 (ebk). ISBN978-0-7923-2964-0 (pbk). doi:10.1007/978-94-011-1160-7.
Stewart, John Lincoln. 1991. Ernst Krenek: The Man and His Music. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. ISBN978-0-520-07014-1 (hbk).
Straus, Joseph N. 2001. Stravinsky's Late Music. Cambridge Studies in Music Theory and Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN978-0-521-80220-8 (hbk).
Straus, Joseph N. 1999. "The Myth of Serial 'Tyranny' in the 1950s and 1960s". The Musical Quarterly 83(3):301–343. doi:10.1093/mq/83.3.301.
Stravinsky, Igor. 1959. "[Foreword]". Die Reihe 2 (2nd rev. English ed.) vii.
Street, Alan. 1989. "Superior Myths, Dogmatic Allegories: The Resistance to Musical Unity". Music Analysis 8(77–123). doi:10.2307/854327.
Street, Alan. 2005. "Expression and construction: the stage works of Schoenberg and Berg". The Cambridge Companion to Twentieth-Century Opera, ed. Mervyn Cooke, 85–104. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN978-0-521-78009-4 (hbk).
Street, Alan. 2013. "Identity Formation in Webern's Six Pieces for Large Orchestra, op. 6". Music and Narrative since 1900, eds. and pref. Michael L. Klein and Nicholas Reyland, 381–400. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. ISBN978-0-253-00644-8 (pbk).
Suchoff, Benjamin. 2004. Béla Bartók: A Celebration. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press. ISBN978-0-8108-4958-7 (hbk).
Taruskin, Richard. 2011. "'Alte Musik' or 'Early Music'?". Twentieth-Century Music 8(1):3–28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/S1478572211000260.
Taruskin, Richard. 2009. Music in the Late Twentieth Century. The Oxford History of Western Music, Vol. 5. Revised edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN978-0-19-538485-7.
Taruskin, Richard. 2009. Music in the Early Twentieth Century. The Oxford History of Western Music, Vol. 4. Revised edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN978-0-19-538484-0 (pbk).
Taruskin, Richard. 2009. "Preface: Against Utopia". The Danger of Music and Other Anti-Utopian Essays, ix–xvi. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. ISBN978-0-520-94279-0 (ebk). ISBN978-0-520-24977-6 (hbk).
Taruskin, Richard. 2009. "How Talented Composers Become Useless". The Danger of Music and Other Anti-Utopian Essays, 86–93. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. ISBN978-0-520-94279-0 (ebk). ISBN978-0-520-24977-6 (hbk).
Taruskin, Richard. 2009. "Back to Whom? Neoclassicism as Ideology". The Danger of Music and Other Anti-Utopian Essays, 382–405. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. ISBN978-0-520-94279-0 (ebk). ISBN978-0-520-24977-6 (hbk).
Taruskin, Richard. 2009. "The Dark Side of the Moon". The Danger of Music and Other Anti-Utopian Essays, 202–216. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. ISBN978-0-520-24977-6 (ebk). ISBN978-0-520-24977-6 (hbk).
Taruskin, Richard. 1996. Stravinsky and the Russian Traditions, Vol. II: A Biography of the Works Through Mavra. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. ISBN978-0-520-07099-8.
Taruskin, Richard. 1996. "How Talented Composers Become Useless". Classical View. The New York Times Archives (10 March 1996, web site accessed 30 Mar. 2024).
Taruskin, Richard. 1994. "Does Nature Call the Tune?". Classical View. The New York Times Archives (18 Sept 1994, web site accessed 30 Mar. 2024).
Thorau, Christian. 2013. "Werk, Wissen, und touristisches Hören: Popularisierende Kanonbildung in Programmheften und Konzertführern". Der Kanon der Musik, Theorie und Geschichte: Ein Handbuch, eds. and intro. Klaus Pietschmann and Melanie Wald-Fuhrmann [de], 535–561. Munich: edition text + kritik. ISBN978-3-86916-981-1 (ebk). ISBN978-3-86916-106-8 (pbk).
Toorn, Pieter van den and John McGinness. 2012. Stravinsky and the Russian Period: Sound and Legacy of a Musical Idiom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN978-1-107-02100-6 (hbk).
Tsenova, Valeria. 2014. Underground Music from the Former USSR, ed. Valeria Tsenova, trans. Romela Kohanovskaya. Amsterdam: Overseas Publishers Association. ISBN978-1-134-37165-5 (ebk).
Tymoczko, Dmitri. 2011. A Geometry of Music: Harmony and Counterpoint in the Extended Common Practice. Oxford Studies in Music Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, ed. Richard Cohn. ISBN978-0-19-533667-2.
Utz, Christian. Musical Composition in the Context of Globalization: New Perspectives on Music History in the 20th and 21st Century, ed. Wieland Hoban. [Trans. Laurence Sinclair Willis.] Rev. and expanded ed. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag. ISBN978-3-8376-5095-2.
Wasserman, Janek. 2014. Black Vienna: The Radical Right in the Red City, 1918–1938. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press. ISBN978-0-8014-5522-3 (ebk).
Vandagriff, Rachel S. 2017. "Perspectives and the Patron: Paul Fromm, Benjamin Boretz and Perspectives of New Music". Journal of the Royal Musical Association 142(2):327–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1080/02690403.2017.1361175.
Watkins, Glenn. 1994. Pyramids at the Louvre: Music, Culture, and Collage from Stravinsky to the Postmodernists. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. ISBN978-0-674-74083-9.
Watkins, Glenn. 1988. Soundings: Music in the Twentieth Century. New York: Schirmer. ISBN978-0-02-873290-9.
Webern, Anton. 1963. The Path to the New Music, ed. Willi Reich [de], trans. Leo Black. Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania: Theodore Presser Co., in Association with Universal Edition. Reprinted London: Universal Edition, 1975. Trans. of Der Wege zur neuen Musik, Vienna: Universal Edition, 1960.
Webern, Anton. 1967. "Letters to Hildegard Jone and Josef Humplik", ed. Josef Polnauer, trans. Cornelius Cardew and Élisabeth Bouillon. Bryn Mawr: Theodore Presser; London, Vienna, and Zürich: Universal Edition.
White, Harry. 2008. Music and the Irish Literary Imagination. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN978-0-19-156316-4.
Wedler, Sebastian. 2015. "Thus Spoke the Early Modernist: Zarathustra and Rotational Form in Webern's String Quartet (1905)." Twentieth-Century Music 12(2):225–251.
Wlodarski, Amy Lynn. 2019. George Rochberg, American Composer: Personal Trauma and Artistic Creativity. Eastman Studies in Music Series, senior ed. Ralph P. Locke. Rochester: University of Rochester Press. ISBN978-1-58046-947-0.
Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf de Cillia [de], Martin Reisigl, and Karin Liebhart [de]. The Discursive Construction of National Identity, abbrev. and trans. Angelika Hirsch, Richard Mitten, and J. W. Unger. Second edition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1999, 2003, 2005, and 2009. (Originally published in German. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1998.) ISBN978-0-7486-3726-3 (hbk). ISBN978-0-7486-3734-8 (pbk).
Zenck, Martin [de]. 1989. "Tradition as authority and provocation: Anton Webern's confrontation with Johann Sebastian Bach". Bach Studies, ed. Don O. Franklin, pref. Don O. Franklin and Johannes Tall, 297–322. Cambridge Composer Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN978-0-521-34105-9 (hbk).
McClary, Susan. Spring 1989. "Terminal Prestige: The Case of Avant-Garde Music Composition". Cultural Critique ("Discursive Strategies and the Economy of Prestige"). 12:57–81.
Mead, Andrew. 1993. "Webern, Tradition, and 'Composing with Twelve Tones'". Music Theory Spectrum 15(2):173–204. doi:10.2307/745813
Moldenhauer, Hans. 1966. Anton von Webern Perspectives. Ed. Demar Irvine, with an introductory interview with Igor Stravinsky. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Noller, Joachim. 1990. "Bedeutungsstrukturen: zu Anton Weberns 'alpinen' Programmen". Neue Zeitschrift für Musik 151(9):12–18.
Perle, George. 1991. Serial Composition and Atonality: An Introduction to the Music of Schoenberg, Berg and Webern. Sixth ed. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Pousseur, Henri. 1964. "Music, Form and Practice (an Attempt to Reconcile Some Contradictions)". Trans. Margaret Shenfield. Die Reihe 6 (English ed. 1964, German ed. 1960):77–93. Reprint from original in Revue belge de Musicologie / Belgisch Tijdschrift voor Muziekwetenschap 13 (1959).
Tsang, Lee. 2002. "The Atonal Music of Anton Webern (1998) by Allen Forte". Music Analysis 21(3): 417–427.
Taruskin, Richard. 2009. Music in the Nineteenth Century. The Oxford History of Western Music, Vol. 3. Revised edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN978-0-19-538483-3.
Wildgans, Friedrich. 1966. Anton Webern. Trans. Edith Temple Roberts and Humphrey Searle. Intro. and notes by Humphrey Searle. New York: October House.