It is
proposed that this article be deleted because of the following concern:
Not a community. This was a non-notable minor railroad waypoint. Appears on the 1953 and 1992 Lincoln USGS topo maps: [1] as just a spot on the tracks where a short spur headed off to a clay pit. Railroad points are subject to WP:GNG which is unambiguously failed in this case because no other information could be found; the cited sources are not sufficient for notability. (proposed by WeirdNAnnoyed)
If you can address this concern by improving, copyediting, sourcing, renaming, or merging the page, please edit this page and do so. You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason. Although not required, you are encouraged to explain why you object to the deletion, either in your edit summary or on the talk page. If this template is removed, do not replace it.
The article may be deleted if this message remains in place for seven days, i.e., after 01:43, 30 December 2023 (UTC).
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article so that it is acceptable according to the deletion policy.
Find sources: "Clayton, Placer County, California" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTORPROD
Expired+%5B%5BWP%3APROD%7CPROD%5D%5D%2C+concern+was%3A+Not+a+community.++This+was+a+non-notable+minor+railroad+waypoint.++Appears+on+the+1953+and+1992+Lincoln+USGS+topo+maps%3A+%5Bhttps%3A%2F%2Fngmdb.usgs.gov%2Ftopoview%2Fviewer%2F%2314%2F38.9080%2F-121.3122%5D+as+just+a+spot+on+the+tracks+where+a+short+spur+headed+off+to+a+clay+pit.++Railroad+points+are+subject+to+%5B%5BWP%3AGNG%5D%5D+which+is+unambiguously+failed+in+this+case+because+no+other+information+could+be+found%3B+the+cited+sources+are+not+sufficient+for+notability.
Expired [[WP:PROD|prod]], concern was: Not a community. This was a non-notable minor railroad waypoint. Appears on the 1953 and 1992 Lincoln USGS topo maps:
[2] as just a spot on the tracks where a short spur headed off to a clay pit. Railroad points are subject to
WP:GNG which is unambiguously failed in this case because no other information could be found; the cited sources are not sufficient for notability.