In particular the shear stress at the wall can, in turn, be related to the pressure loss by multiplying the wall shear stress by the wall area ( for a pipe with circular cross section) and dividing by the cross-sectional flow area ( for a pipe with circular cross section). Thus
This friction factor is one-fourth of the Darcy friction factor, so attention must be paid to note which one of these is meant in the "friction factor" chart or equation consulted. Of the two, the Fanning friction factor is the more commonly used by chemical engineers and those following the British convention.
The formulas below may be used to obtain the Fanning friction factor for common applications.
When the pipes have certain roughness , this factor must be taken in account when the Fanning friction factor is calculated. The relationship between pipe roughness and Fanning friction factor was developed by Haaland (1983) under flow conditions of
is the roughness of the inner surface of the pipe (dimension of length)
D is inner pipe diameter;
The Swamee–Jain equation is used to solve directly for the Darcy–Weisbach friction factor f for a full-flowing circular pipe. It is an approximation of the implicit Colebrook–White equation.[10]
As the roughness extends into turbulent core, the Fanning friction factor becomes independent of fluid viscosity at large Reynolds numbers, as illustrated by Nikuradse and Reichert (1943) for the flow in region of . The equation below has been modified from the original format which was developed for Darcy friction factor by a factor of
For the turbulent flow regime, the relationship between the Fanning friction factor and the Reynolds number is more complex and is governed by the Colebrook equation[6] which is implicit in :
Various explicit approximations of the related Darcy friction factor have been developed for turbulent flow.
Stuart W. Churchill[5] developed a formula that covers the friction factor for both laminar and turbulent flow. This was originally produced to describe the Moody chart, which plots the Darcy-Weisbach Friction factor against Reynolds number. The Darcy Weisbach Formula , also called Moody friction factor, is 4 times the Fanning friction factor and so a factor of has been applied to produce the formula given below.
Due to geometry of non-circular conduits, the Fanning friction factor can be estimated from algebraic expressions above by using hydraulic radius when calculating for Reynolds number
The friction head can be related to the pressure loss due to friction by dividing the pressure loss by the product of the acceleration due to gravity and the density of the fluid. Accordingly, the relationship between the friction head and the Fanning friction factor is:
^McCabe, Warren; Smith, Julian; Harriott, Peter (2004). Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. pp. 98–119. ISBN978-0072848236.
^ abChurchill, S.W. (1977). "Friction factor equation spans all fluid-flow regimes". Chemical Engineering. 84 (24): 91–92.
^ abColebrook, C. F.; White, C. M. (3 August 1937). "Experiments with Fluid Friction in Roughened Pipes". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 161 (906): 367–381. Bibcode:1937RSPSA.161..367C. doi:10.1098/rspa.1937.0150. JSTOR96790.
^Klinzing, E. G. (2010). Pneumatic conveying of solids : a theoretical and practical approach. Springer. ISBN9789048136094. OCLC667991206.
^ abBragg, R (1995). Fluid Flow for Chemical and Process Engineers. Butterworth-Heinemann [Imprint]. ISBN9780340610589. OCLC697596706.
^Swamee, P.K.; Jain, A.K. (1976). "Explicit equations for pipe-flow problems". Journal of the Hydraulics Division. 102 (5): 657–664. doi:10.1061/JYCEAJ.0004542.
^Pavlou, Dimitrios G. (2013). Composite materials in piping applications : design, analysis and optimization of subsea and onshore pipelines from FRP materials. DEStech Publications. ISBN9781605950297. OCLC942612658.