Light chain deposition disease (LCDD) is a rare blood cell disease which is characterized by deposition of fragments of infection-fighting immunoglobulins, called light chains (LCs), in the body. LCs are normally cleared by the kidneys, but in LCDD, these light chain deposits damage organs and cause disease. The kidneys are almost always affected and this often leads to kidney failure. About half of people with light chain deposition disease also have a plasma cell dyscrasia, a spectrum of diseases that includes multiple myeloma, Waldenström's macroglobulinemia, and the monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significancepremalignant stages of these two diseases.[1][2] Unlike in AL amyloidosis, in which light chains are laid down in characteristic amyloid deposits, in LCDD, light chains are deposited in non-amyloid granules.[3]
The liver is the most common extra-renal site in LCDD, although involvement is not always limited to this organ. There appears to be no relationship between the degree of light chain deposition within the liver and the severity of liver dysfunction.[7] In addition to portal hypertension and hepatic insufficiency, affected patients may die from hepatic failure.[8]
The lungs are rarely affected by light chain deposition disease, which typically damages the parenchyma;[11] bronchial involvement seems to be extremely uncommon.[12] However recent reports have indicated that the major airways are involved. There have been descriptions of nodular as well as diffuse pulmonary interstitial diseases; however, the literature has only reported seven occurrences of pulmonary nodular-type LCDD to date.[13]
The effects of systemic protein deposition on the nerves are comparable to those of amyloidosis, which is clinically characterized by polyneuropathy.[14] Deposits may form in the choroid plexus and along nerve fibers.[15] Additionally, isolated LCDD within the brain has been reported.[16]
The main light chain structure in LCDD presumably dictates how the disease manifests in the body. Though κI-IV has been described,[17] the sequenced kappa light chains in LCDD are more likely to belong to the V-region subtype, of which VκIV appears to be overrepresented.[18] The pathogenicity of these proteins has not been linked to any particular structural pattern or residue, but a number of recurring characteristics have been identified.[19] Firstly, somatic mutations, not germline mutations, are the source of the amino acid substitutions. Secondly, the region that determines complementarity is where substitutions happen most frequently.[17] Third, hydrophobic residues are more likely to be introduced by the mutations reported in both the kappa and light chains.[20] This could disrupt protein-protein interactions and destabilize the protein, leading to protein deposition in tissues.[21] The propensity for aggregation is exemplified in a murine model of LCDD where light chain deposition was observed in the kidney of transfected mice using vectors that contained kappa light chain sequence from an individual with LCDD with the VκIV subtype.[22] Lastly, because some patients with LCDD have isolates of kappa light chains with mutations that produce new N-glycosylation sites, posttranslational modification can be linked to the creation of pathologic light chains.[23] It is possible that the new hydrophobic residues along with N-glycosylation sites will make it more likely for the light chains to accumulate in the affected tissues' basement membranes.[24] The mesangial cell is also thought to play a role in the pathogenesis of LCDD.[25]
A number of laboratory tests are required in order to assist in diagnosing LCDD. Blood and urine samples are collected for evaluation of kidney and liver function and determination of the presence of a monoclonal protein. Imaging studies such as echocardiography and an ultrasound of the abdomen will be performed. A CT scan, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or positron emission tomography (PET) may also be indicated.[26]
Patients suspected of having LCDD should be evaluated using the screening panel for plasma cell proliferative disorders.[27] However, the sensitivity of laboratory testing strategies for detecting monoclonal gammopathies has increased with the development of quantitative serum assays to test for immunoglobulin free light chain;[28] this increased diagnostic sensitivity is easily noticeable in the monoclonal light chain diseases.[29] The most recent diagnostic screening guidelines state that serum immunofixation in addition to immunoglobulin free light chain is an adequate screening panel for plasma cell proliferative disorders apart from AL amyloidosis and LCDD due to the increased sensitivity for free light chain diseases. It is advised, nevertheless, that urine immunofixation be used in addition to LCDD and AL amyloidosis screening.[27]
Different light chain deposition does not appear to have an impact on the clinical course of LCDD patients, as the clinical presentation is known to depend on the quantity and type of affected organs.[33] The median survival time is roughly four years. Following a median follow-up of 27 months, the most comprehensive series to date found that 59% of cases resulted in death and 57% of cases reached uremia.[4] LCDD prognostic factors include age, extrarenal light chain deposition, and plasma cell myeloma.[34]
^p. Koopman; j. Van Dorpe; b. Maes; k. Dujardin (2009). "Light chain deposition disease as a rare cause of restrictive cardiomyopathy". Acta Cardiologica. 64 (6). Peeters online journals: 821–824. doi:10.2143/AC.64.6.2044752. PMID20128164. S2CID41656061.
^Piard; Yaziji; Jarry; Assem; Martin; Bernard; Jacquot; Justrabo (1998). "Solitary plasmacytoma of the lung with light chain extracellular deposits: a case report and review of the literature". Histopathology. 32 (4). Wiley: 356–361. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2559.1998.00393.x. ISSN0309-0167. PMID9602333. S2CID33700713.
^Grassi, M. P.; Clerici, F.; Perin, C.; Borella, M.; Mangoni, A.; Gendarini, A.; Quattrini, A.; Nemni, R. (1998). "Light chain deposition disease neuropathy resembling amyloid neuropathy in a multiple myeloma patient". The Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences. 19 (4). Springer Science and Business Media LLC: 229–233. doi:10.1007/bf02427609. ISSN0392-0461. PMID10933463. S2CID1052811.