In the context of computer programming, magic is an informal term for abstraction; it is used to describe code that handles complex tasks while hiding that complexity to present a simple interface. The term is somewhat tongue-in-cheek, and often carries bad connotations, implying that the true behavior of the code is not immediately apparent. For example, Perl's polymorphic typing and closure mechanisms are often called "magic".
The term implies that the hidden complexity is at least in principle understandable, in contrast to variants which describe arcane techniques that are deliberately hidden or extremely difficult to understand. However, the term can also be applied endearingly, suggesting a "charm" about the code.
The action of such abstractions is described as being done "automagically", a portmanteau of "automatically" and "magically".
"Magic" refers to procedures which make calculations based on data not clearly provided to them, by accessing other modules, memory positions or global variables that they are not supposed to (in other words, they are not referentially transparent). According to most recent software architecture models, even when using structured programming, it is usually preferred to make each function behave the same way every time the same arguments are passed to it, thereby following one of the basic principles of functional programming. When a function breaks this rule, it is often said to contain "magic".
A simplified example of negative magic is the following code in PHP:
function magic()
{
global $somevariable;
echo $somevariable;
}
$somevariable = true;
magic();
While the code above is clear, if it is seen in a large project, it is often hard to understand where the function magic()
gets its value from. It is preferred to write that code using the following concept:
function noMagic($myvariable)
{
echo $myvariable;
}
$somevariable = true;
noMagic($somevariable);
Any SV [scalar value] may be magical, that is, it has special features that a normal SV does not have.
— Larry Wall, perlguts manual page,[1] Perl 5
This definition of magic or magical can be extended to a data type, code fragment, keyword, or machine address that has properties not shared by otherwise identical objects. The magical properties may or may not be documented.
FILE
) cannot be safely copied as their addresses[2] may be magic. That is, the runtime environment may place original file handles in a hard-coded address range, and not provide file handle behaviour to a user-created copy at another address. Consequently, the standard library routines accept pointers to file handles, of type FILE *
, instead.while(<file_handle>)
implicitly assigns the line read from the file by <file_handle> to the variable $_
, and applies the defined()
function to the expression so that any successfully read string, even "0"
or the empty string, evaluates as true and continues the while()
loop. This does not happen to <file_handle> anywhere else, or to while()
with any other control expression.[3]CALL
statement of BBC BASIC V treats the system call addresses of Acorn MOS magically; instead of attempting to branch to ARM code at those addresses, it raises a software interrupt in RISC OS equivalent to the system call.[4][non-primary source needed] The effect is to emulate Acorn MOS sufficiently for 8-bit BASIC programs not containing assembly language to run without modification.@%
control print formatting, it accepts direct assignment of ANSI printf format strings, normally a type mismatch error.[4]typeof
operator succeeds when the operand is an undeclared identifier, which would normally result in a ReferenceError
.stdio.h
header file". The C book: Featuring the ANSI C standard. The Instruction Set (2nd ed.). Wokingham, England: Addison-Wesley Publishers. p. 234. ISBN 0-201-54433-4. It is not safe to copy these objects within the program; sometimes their addresses may be 'magic'.