An editor has nominated this article for deletion. You are welcome to participate in the deletion discussion, which will decide whether or not to retain it. |
Formation | 1982 |
---|---|
Founder | Ronald K. Hoeflin |
Type | High IQ society |
Membership | 36[1] |
Official language | English |
Administrator | Brian Wiksell |
Website | www |
The Mega Society is a high IQ society.[2] It was founded in 1982 by Ronald K. Hoeflin to facilitate psychometric research.[3][better source needed]
The Mega Society was founded in 1982 by Ronald K. Hoeflin. The society's journal has been published since January 1982, and was originally called the Circle. It changed its name to Noesis in July 1987 and is currently, the journal is published on an irregular basis.[4]
In the 1989 edition of The Guinness Book of World Records claimed that the Hoeflin Research Group was the most elite ultra High IQ Society with percentiles of 99.9999 or one in a million required for admission.[5]
The Mega test is described as a "nonstandardized test" by a psychologist who wrote a 2012 book on the history of IQ testing.[6] In addition, there is controversy about whether these tests have been properly validated.[7]
The standard scores on most currently normed IQ tests fall in a range whereby a score of 160 corresponds to a rarity of about 1 person in 31,560. Leaving aside error of measurement common to all IQ tests, this falls short of the Mega Society's 1 in a million requirement.[8] IQ scores above this level have been criticized as being dubious as there are insufficient normative cases upon which to base a statistically justified rank-ordering.[9][10]
And what is that makes Marilyn vos Savant so uniquely qualified to answer such questions? There is only one reason: she is listed in the Guinness Book of World Records as having the highest IQ ever recorded. Never mind that this record is based on a nonstandardized test put out by an obscure group known as Mega, supposedly the world's most selective organization of geniuses. Ignore the fact that test scores at the extreme ends of any distribution are notoriously unreliable.
From the article: "Although the approach that Hoeflin takes is interesting, inventive, intellectually stimulating, and internally consistent, it violates many good psychometric principles by overinterpreting the weak data of a self-selected sample."
norm tables that provide you with such extreme values are constructed on the basis of random extrapolation and smoothing but not on the basis of empirical data of representative samples.
[Curve-fitting] is just one of the reasons to be suspicious of reported IQ scores much higher than 160