Mifflin v. Dutton

This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. Please improve this article by adding secondary or tertiary sources. Find sources: "Mifflin v. Dutton" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (January 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Mifflin v. Dutton
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued April 30 – May 1, 1903 Decided June 1, 1903
Full case name	Mifflin v. Dutton
Citations	190 U.S. 265 (more) 23 S. Ct. 771; 47 L. Ed. 1043
Holding
The authorized appearance of a work in a magazine without a copyright notice specifically dedicated to that work transfers that work into the public domain.
Court membership
Chief Justice Melville Fuller Associate Justices John M. Harlan · David J. Brewer Henry B. Brown · Edward D. White Rufus W. Peckham · Joseph McKenna Oliver W. Holmes Jr. · William R. Day
Case opinion
Majority	Brown, joined by unanimous

Mifflin v. Dutton, 190 U.S. 265 (1903), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the authorized appearance of a work in a magazine without a copyright notice specifically dedicated to that work transfers that work into the public domain.^[1]

The case concerned the publication of The Minister's Wooing by Harriet Beecher Stowe, published chapter-by-chapter in Atlantic Monthly before and after a copyright filing, and never with the required notice in the magazine. Following the serialization, Houghton, Mifflin & Co. published a single volume with proper copyright on behalf of Stowe and, later her estate. E. P. Dutton published the same book claiming it was in the public domain and the court agreed.

This case shared its reasoning with the previous case Mifflin v. R. H. White Company.^[2]

• Text of Mifflin v. Dutton, 190 U.S. 265 (1903) is available from: CourtListener Justia Library of Congress

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

• v
• t
• e