Reform of money supply and the banking system in the US
Monetary reform in the United States refers to proposals and movements to change how money is created and regulated in the financial system. Reform efforts have emerged periodically in US history due to concerns about economic stability, banking practices, debt, and concentrated power.
Colonial monetary systems were idiosyncratic,[1] with individual colonies having their own currencies.[2] This gave colonies significant economic independence.[3]
The struggle for monetary control continued after independence. In 1781, the Bank of North America became the first incorporated bank in the United States,[4] serving several functions of a central bank.[5] After the Pennsylvania legislature annulled its charter in 1785,[6] a later charter was limited to 14 years and $2 million total assets.[7]
President Andrew Jackson was a prominent critic of the central bank, arguing it concentrated financial power in a single institution and enriched wealthy interests with special privileges.[11] He objected to it transferring power from elected officials to unelected bankers and foreign influence in monetary policy.[12] Jackson's successful campaign against the Second Bank of the United States reflected broader populist monetary policy concerns.[13]
In the "free banking" era from 1837-1862, anyone meeting minimum capital requirements could open a bank.[14] Thousands of different bank notes circulated, making fraud difficult to prevent.[15] This decentralized monetary experiment fed later debates about central control[16] and innovation.[17]
Regional monetary experiments included the Suffolk System, operating in New England from 1824-1858. This clearinghouse facilitated interbank payments, but it lacked money supply control.[18] Upon statehood in 1837, Michigan permitted free banking[19] until the system collapsed in 1839.[20]
The absence of a central bank during the mid-19th century[23] led to frequent financial panics and economic instability,[24] while also creating space for innovative monetary reform movements, including the Greenback movement,[25] which emerged from American Civil War financing.[26]
During the Civil War, Congress passed the first Legal Tender Act on February 25, 1862,[27] authorizing the issuance of $150 million in United States Notes.[28] Between 1862 and 1865, the U.S. government issued more than $450 million in paper money not backed by gold to finance the war effort. These notes were called "greenbacks" because of their distinctive green ink.[29]
The success of greenbacks in financing the war inspired a broader movement advocating continued use of fiat currency.[30] Following the Panic of 1873, laborers, farmers, and businessmen organized the Greenback Party in Indiana in 1874[31] to urge the federal government to inflate the economy by expanding the money supply with greenbacks.[32]
Farmers turned to third parties like the Greenback Party for economic relief[33] and reduce the power of financial elites.[34] They were concerned about falling prices, an inadequate money supply, and huge debt burdens.[35] Eastern financial interests advocated for the gold standard to ensure currency stability and prevent inflation.[36]
The Greenback Party achieved notable political success as a third party. The party's platform focused upon repeal of the Specie Payment Resumption Act and use of non-gold-backed United States Notes.[37] In 1876, they nominated Peter Cooper for president, and merging with labor reform groups in 1878 they polled a million votes and won 14 seats in Congress. In 1880, the Greenback Party nominated James B. Weaver, receiving just over 300,000 votes.[38]
In the 1890s, the People's Party opposed the gold standard and demanded monetary reforms including unlimited silver coinage.[39] The 1892 platform addressed silver demonetization,[40] and James B. Weaver, the People's Party nominee, received over 8% of the Presidential vote, winning 5 states.[41] Silver advocates called it "the people's money."[42]
In 1890 the Sherman Silver Purchase Act passed, requiring the Treasury to buy 4.5 million ounces of silver each month[43] and issue new Notes redeemable for silver or gold. Speculators redeemed Notes for gold leading to the Panic of 1893 and the repeal of the Sherman Silver Purchase Act. Despite the famous Cross of Gold speech, William Jennings Bryan lost the 1896 election, ending silver's role as an official currency in the United States.[44]
The continued absence of a central bank led to recurring financial crises throughout the late 19th century.[45] The Panic of 1907 showed the need for a more stable monetary system as a credit crunch dried up business funding sources. J.P. Morgan functioned as a one-man central bank, spurring interest in establishing a central bank.[46]
The Great Depression of the 1930s sparked intense debate about monetary policy and banking reform.[50] The most significant proposal to emerge from this period was the Chicago Plan, developed by economists at the University of Chicago.[51] The plan proposed ending fractional reserve banking by requiring banks to hold 100% reserves against demand deposits, effectively separating money creation from commercial banking.[52]
Proponents argued that this reform would reduce the severity of business cycles,[53] eliminate bank runs, and give government greater control over the money supply.[54] While the plan was not implemented, it continues to be referenced by reform advocates.[55]
The 2008 financial crisis revealed major banks had taken excessive risks, with taxpayer bailouts protecting "too big to fail" financial institutions[58] while bank profits remained privatized.[59] Massive Federal Reserve interventions during and after the crisis, like quantitative easing, raised questions about the central bank's role and independence.[60]
Bitcoin critics say its significant price fluctuations make it unsuitable as the mainstream payment method worldwide, suggesting a cryptocurrency based on special drawing rights,[64] though wide use of cryptocurrency could create systemic risk.[65]