Remains of an orogenic belt formed during the Silurian–Devonian period
The Scandinavian Caledonides are the vestiges of an ancient, today deeply eroded orogenic belt formed during the Silurian–Devoniancontinental collision of Baltica and Laurentia, which is referred to as the Scandian phase of the Caledonian orogeny.[11] The size of the Scandinavian Caledonides at the time of their formation can be compared with the size of the Himalayas.[12] The area east of the Scandinavian Caledonides, including parts of Finland, developed into a foreland basin where old rocks and surfaces were covered by sediments.[13] Today, the Scandinavian Caledonides underlie most of the western and northern Scandinavian Peninsula,[14][15] whereas other parts of the Caledonides can be traced into West and Central Europe as well as parts of Greenland[16] and eastern North America.
The Caledonian Wilson cycle commenced with the continental break-up of Rodinia[17] and the opening of the Iapetus ocean about 616–583 Ma (mega-annum) ago.[18][19][20] The Iapetus was at its widest in the Late Cambrian–Early Ordovician[21][1] before it began to close by subduction of Iapetus crust along the Gondawanan and Laurentian margins starting between 500 and 488 Ma ago.[1][22][23] Subduction of Iapteus crust continued until about 430 Ma ago until the final continental collision of Laurentia with Baltica, i.e. the Scandian phase of the Caledonian orogeny. The time of the continental collision is estimated by the cessation of subduction-related magmatism and a common apparent polar wander path (APWP) for Laurentia and Baltica.[24][7]
Following the subduction of the Baltican continental margin and thrusting of the nappes over the Baltican basement, the orogen began to collapse in the Early Devonian, which was associated with extensional tectonics[25][26] and sinistral motion between the Laurentian and Baltican tectonic plates.
The Caledonian orogeny put in place most of the bedrock now seen in the Scandinavian Mountains. Caledonian rocks overlie rocks of the much older Svecokarelian and Sveconorwegianprovinces. The Caledonian rocks form large nappes (Swedish: skollor) that have been thrust over the older rocks. Much of the Caledonian rocks have been eroded since they were put in place meaning that they were once thicker and more contiguous. It is also implied from the erosion that the nappes of Caledonian rock originally reached further east than they do today. The erosion has left remaining massifs of Caledonian rocks and windows of Precambrian-aged rock.[27]
While there are some disagreements, geologists generally recognize four units among the nappes: an Uppermost, an Upper, a Middle and a Lower one.[28][A] The last one is made up Ediacaran (Vendian), Cambrian, Ordovician and Silurian-aged sedimentary rocks. Pieces of Precambrian shield rocks are in some places also incorporated into the Lower nappes.[27]
Despite occurring in roughly the same area, the ancient Scandinavian Caledonian Mountains and the modern Scandinavian Mountains are not synonymous. The overlap between the Scandinavian Caledonides and the Scandinavian Mountains has led to various suggestions that the modern Scandinavian Mountains are a remnant of the Caledonide mountains.[14][30] A version of this argument was put forward in 2009 with the claim that the uplift of the mountains was attained by buoyancy of the surviving "mountain roots" of the Caledonian orogen.[14] This concept has been criticized because there is only a tiny "mountain root" beneath the southern Scandinavian Mountains and no "root" at all in the north. Further, the Caledonian Mountains in Scandinavia are known to have undergone orogenic collapse for a long period starting in the Devonian.[14][31][26] Another problem with this model is that it does not explain why other former mountains dating back to the Caledonian orogeny are eroded and buried in sediments and not uplifted by their "roots".[14] Others claim that molten magma exists below the Caledonides of Norway, causing the uplift.[32]
^Corfu and coworkers assess the scheme as a "useful basis for further exploration" but regard it also as "too rigid and simplistic" since paleogeography is poorly represented.[29]
^Torsvik, Trond; Smethurst, M.; Meert, J.; Van der Voo, Rob; McKerrow, W.; Brasier, M.; Sturt, Brian A.; Walderhaug, H. (1996). "Continental break-up and collision in the Neoproterozoic and Palaeozoic — A tale of Baltica and Laurentia". Earth-Science Reviews. 40 (3–4): 229–258. Bibcode:1996ESRv...40..229T. doi:10.1016/0012-8252(96)00008-6. ISSN0012-8252.
^Mosar, Jon; Eide, Elizabeth A.; Osmundsen, Per Terje; Sommaruga, Anna; Torsvik, Trond H. (2002). "Greenland-Norway separation: A geodynamic model for the North Atlantic". Norwegian Journal of Geology. 82: 281–298.
^Murrell, G.R.; Andriessen, P.A.M. (2004). "Unravelling a long-term multi-event thermal record in the cratonic interior of southern Finland through apatite fission track thermochronology". Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C. 29 (10): 695–706. Bibcode:2004PCE....29..695M. doi:10.1016/j.pce.2004.03.007.
^Haller, J. (1985). "The East Greenland Caledonides—reviewed". The Caledonide Orogen—Scandinavia and Related Areas: 1031–1046.
^Torsvik, Trond H.; Cocks, L. Robin M. (2016), "Earth's Origins and the Precambrian", Earth History and Palaeogeography, Cambridge University Press, pp. 77–84, doi:10.1017/9781316225523.005, ISBN9781316225523
^Meert, Joseph G.; Torsvik, Trond H.; Eide, Elizabeth A.; Dahlgren, Sven (1998). "Tectonic Significance of the Fen Province, S. Norway: Constraints From Geochronology and Paleomagnetism". The Journal of Geology. 106 (5): 553–564. Bibcode:1998JG....106..553M. doi:10.1086/516041. ISSN0022-1376. S2CID129740587.
^Bingen, B.; Demaiffe, D.; Breemen, O. van (1998). "The 616 Ma Old Egersund Basaltic Dike Swarm, Sw Norway, and Late Neoproterozoic Opening of the Iapetus Ocean". The Journal of Geology. 106 (5): 565–574. Bibcode:1998JG....106..565B. doi:10.1086/516042. ISSN0022-1376. S2CID59043758.
^Torsvik, Trond H.; Cocks, L. Robin M. (2016), "Ordovician", Earth History and Palaeogeography, Cambridge University Press, pp. 101–123, doi:10.1017/9781316225523.007, ISBN9781316225523
^Dunning, G. R.; Pedersen, R. B. (1988). "U/Pb ages of ophiolites and arc-related plutons of the Norwegian Caledonides: implications for the development of Iapetus". Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology. 98 (1): 13–23. Bibcode:1988CoMP...98...13D. doi:10.1007/bf00371904. ISSN0010-7999. S2CID129115454.
^Slagstad, Trond; Pin, Christian; Roberts, David; Kirkland, Christopher L.; Grenne, Tor; Dunning, Greg; Sauer, Simone; Andersen, Tom (2013). "Tectonomagmatic evolution of the Early Ordovician suprasubduction-zone ophiolites of the Trondheim Region, Mid-Norwegian Caledonides". Geological Society, London, Special Publications. 390 (1): 541–561. doi:10.1144/sp390.11. ISSN0305-8719. S2CID129082705.
^Stephens, M. B.; Gee, David G. (1985). "A tectonic model for the evolution of the eugeoclinal terranes in the central Scandinavian Caledonides". The Caledonide Orogen—Scandinavia and Related Areas: 954–978.
^Corfu, F.; Andersen, T.B.; Gasser, D. (2014). "The Scandinavian Caledonides: main features, conceptual advances and critical questions". New Perspectives on the Caledonides of Scandinavia and Related Areas. Geological Society, London, Special Publications. Vol. 390. pp. 9–43. Bibcode:2014GSLSP.390....9C. doi:10.1144/SP390.25. S2CID128630362.
^Schiffer, Christian; Balling, Neils; Ebbing, Jörg; Holm Jacobsen, Bo; Nielsen, Søren Bom (2016). "Geophysical-petrological modelling of the East Greenland Caledonides – Isostatic support from crust and upper mantle". Tectonophysics. 692: 44–57. doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2016.06.023.