Susquehanna Steam Electric Station | |
---|---|
Country | United States |
Location | Salem Township, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania |
Coordinates | 41°5′20″N 76°8′56″W / 41.08889°N 76.14889°W |
Status | Operational |
Construction began | November 2, 1973 |
Commission date | Unit 1: June 8, 1983 Unit 2: February 12, 1985 |
Construction cost | $7.983 billion (2007 USD)[1] |
Owners | Talen Energy (90%) Allegheny Electric Cooperative (10%) |
Operator | Talen Energy |
Nuclear power station | |
Reactor type | BWR |
Reactor supplier | General Electric |
Cooling towers | 2 × Natural Draft |
Cooling source | Susquehanna River |
Thermal capacity | 2 × 3952 MWth |
Power generation | |
Units operational | 2 × 1350 MW |
Make and model | BWR-4 (Mark 2) |
Nameplate capacity | 2514 MW |
Capacity factor | 94.50% (2017) 85.05% (lifetime) |
Annual net output | 19,943 GWh (2021) |
External links | |
Website | Susquehanna Nuclear Power Plant |
Commons | Related media on Commons |
The Susquehanna Steam Electric Station is a nuclear power station on the Susquehanna River in Salem Township, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania.
PPL operated the plant until June 2015 when Talen Energy was formed from PPL's competitive supply business. The plant has two General Electric boiling water reactors within a Mark II containment building[2] on a site of 1,075 acres (435 ha), with 1,130 employees working on site and another 180 employees in Allentown, Pennsylvania. Harrisburg-based Allegheny Electric Cooperative purchased 10% of the plant in 1977.[3][4]
Susquehanna produces 63 gigawatt hours per day. It has been in operation since 1983. The prime builder was Bechtel Power Corporation of Reston, Virginia. In November 2009, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) extended the operation licenses of the reactors for an additional 20 years.[5]
Cumulus Data, a subsidiary of Talen Energy, is developing a data center directly connected to the power stations. On January 17, 2023, it completed the phase 1 construction.[6] On March 4, 2024, it was sold to Amazon Web Services for 650 million dollars.[7][8]
Year | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Annual (Total) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2001 | 1,641,381 | 1,482,806 | 1,050,655 | 909,095 | 1,533,526 | 1,568,380 | 1,626,269 | 1,618,389 | 1,586,322 | 1,639,836 | 1,593,926 | 1,614,081 | 17,864,666 |
2002 | 1,627,242 | 1,368,563 | 813,610 | 959,909 | 1,648,911 | 1,586,051 | 1,634,103 | 1,631,149 | 1,583,552 | 1,274,053 | 1,607,308 | 1,663,585 | 17,398,036 |
2003 | 1,640,809 | 1,422,792 | 976,200 | 1,022,446 | 1,649,299 | 1,575,937 | 1,652,085 | 1,643,323 | 1,387,214 | 1,667,531 | 1,625,346 | 1,696,767 | 17,959,749 |
2004 | 1,650,478 | 1,403,764 | 864,302 | 988,853 | 1,668,931 | 1,617,379 | 1,680,026 | 1,666,301 | 1,618,848 | 1,695,244 | 1,449,297 | 1,719,678 | 18,023,101 |
2005 | 1,723,149 | 1,381,611 | 1,038,859 | 1,483,961 | 1,685,803 | 1,468,806 | 1,640,526 | 1,657,191 | 1,616,810 | 1,603,341 | 1,239,475 | 1,724,827 | 18,264,359 |
2006 | 1,723,425 | 1,532,732 | 928,498 | 1,236,026 | 1,552,576 | 1,503,961 | 1,639,653 | 1,661,875 | 1,581,886 | 1,175,403 | 1,541,913 | 1,727,484 | 17,805,432 |
2007 | 1,724,278 | 1,557,034 | 909,886 | 1,163,118 | 1,703,662 | 1,623,539 | 1,676,569 | 1,669,359 | 1,629,479 | 1,181,577 | 1,667,967 | 1,731,434 | 18,237,902 |
2008 | 1,731,666 | 1,610,267 | 942,630 | 1,135,197 | 1,734,942 | 1,635,252 | 1,703,041 | 1,672,452 | 1,662,760 | 1,751,662 | 1,693,887 | 1,766,058 | 19,039,814 |
2009 | 1,771,827 | 1,602,695 | 1,726,689 | 1,004,345 | 1,188,205 | 1,689,774 | 1,756,807 | 1,745,430 | 1,694,390 | 1,783,800 | 1,739,475 | 1,783,220 | 19,486,657 |
2010 | 1,807,052 | 1,565,156 | 919,205 | 690,462 | 1,565,552 | 1,729,962 | 1,316,879 | 1,677,543 | 1,761,339 | 1,824,897 | 1,796,169 | 1,861,363 | 18,515,579 |
2011 | 1,728,725 | 1,682,644 | 1,590,450 | 1,028,381 | 445,235 | 86,601 | 1,610,334 | 1,700,558 | 1,816,715 | 1,904,803 | 1,844,903 | 1,924,377 | 17,363,726 |
2012 | 1,915,903 | 1,795,186 | 1,841,550 | 921,187 | 864,309 | 704,284 | 1,728,928 | 1,826,063 | 1,826,134 | 1,162,708 | 878,645 | 1,449,460 | 16,914,357 |
2013 | 1,913,584 | 1,726,984 | 1,912,078 | 1,276,158 | 225,721 | 1,141,016 | 1,741,591 | 1,869,464 | 1,455,597 | 1,894,580 | 1,819,764 | 1,922,526 | 18,899,063 |
2014 | 1,913,406 | 1,703,367 | 1,116,604 | 1,258,937 | 936,728 | 1,388,426 | 1,705,009 | 1,814,722 | 1,490,264 | 1,891,172 | 1,860,863 | 1,701,797 | 18,781,295 |
2015 | 1,928,439 | 1,735,532 | 1,954,556 | 1,215,948 | 1,063,232 | 1,807,193 | 1,870,327 | 1,868,367 | 1,797,288 | 1,884,454 | 1,564,364 | 1,901,560 | 20,591,260 |
2016 | 1,915,434 | 1,735,811 | 1,234,864 | 885,516 | 1,601,861 | 1,123,585 | 1,846,755 | 1,844,095 | 1,804,267 | 1,643,232 | 1,807,301 | 1,908,254 | 19,350,975 |
2017 | 1,910,531 | 1,665,417 | 1,032,548 | 1,494,551 | 1,878,682 | 1,724,092 | 1,844,050 | 1,858,879 | 1,732,211 | 1,872,981 | 1,844,843 | 1,893,780 | 20,752,565 |
2018 | 1,903,980 | 1,644,670 | 1,694,732 | 907,337 | 1,730,401 | 1,804,216 | 1,837,720 | 1,566,621 | 1,778,638 | 1,877,072 | 1,836,176 | 1,887,159 | 20,468,722 |
2019 | 1,879,592 | 1,625,064 | 1,493,473 | 1,156,300 | 1,863,184 | 1,803,796 | 1,852,517 | 1,867,551 | 1,796,823 | 1,884,813 | 1,831,458 | 1,864,436 | 20,919,007 |
2020 | 1,832,553 | 1,482,539 | 1,536,238 | 895,446 | 1,475,102 | 1,711,863 | 1,848,934 | 1,849,871 | 1,798,231 | 1,858,398 | 1,828,551 | 1,873,177 | 19,990,903 |
2021 | 1,826,498 | 1,553,674 | 1,403,996 | 1,062,730 | 1,864,787 | 1,794,454 | 1,638,047 | 1,854,408 | 1,808,079 | 1,644,610 | 1,819,233 | 1,673,030 | 19,943,546 |
2022 | 1,841,431 | 1,591,781 | 1,566,471 | 866,125 | 1,644,935 | 1,746,251 | 1,818,542 | 1,821,939 | 1,728,111 | 1,759,022 | 1,814,194 | 1,866,229 | 20,065,031 |
2023 | 1,713,699 | 1,629,401 | 1,337,612 | 997,065 | 1,724,610 | 1,683,485 | 1,702,201 | 1,734,624 | 1,627,409 | 1,740,751 | 1,364,045 | 1,746,058 | 19,000,960 |
In 2008, PPL filed an application with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission for a license to build and operate a new nuclear plant under consideration near Berwick, Pennsylvania. The Bell Bend Nuclear Power Plant would be built near the company’s existing two-unit Susquehanna nuclear power plant. On August 30, 2016, Talen Energy formally requested the license application be withdrawn,[10] and the NRC officially accepted the application withdrawal on September 22, 2016,[11] officially cancelling the project. Unlike the existing two units, which are American-designed boiling water reactors, the plan called for the French-German EPR which is a pressurized water reactor. At 1.6 Gigawatt net electric nameplate capacity (1.66 GW in the case of Taishan nuclear power plant), the EPR is the nuclear power plant design with the highest per-reactor electric power output ever built.
In the plant's first emergency, an electrical fire erupted at a switch box that controls the supply of cooling water to emergency systems. No injuries were reported following the 1982 incident.[12]
Roughly 10,000 gallons of mildly radioactive water spilled at the Station's Unit 1 turbine building after a gasket failed in the filtering system in 1985. No radiation was released from the building to the public, and no personnel were contaminated as a result of this incident.[13]
The NRC defines two emergency planning zones around nuclear power plants: a plume exposure pathway zone with a radius of 10 miles (16 km), concerned primarily with exposure to, and inhalation of, airborne radioactive contamination, and an ingestion pathway zone of about 50 miles (80 km), concerned primarily with ingestion of food and liquid contaminated by radioactivity.[14]
The 2010 U.S. population within 10 miles (16 km) of Susquehanna was 54,686, an increase of 3.3 percent in a decade, according to an analysis of U.S. Census data for msnbc.com. The 2010 U.S. population within 50 miles (80 km) was 1,765,761, an increase of 5.5 percent since 2000. Cities within 50 miles include Wilkes-Barre (18 miles to city center) and the larger city, Scranton (33 miles to center city).[15]
The NRC's estimate of the risk each year of an earthquake intense enough to cause core damage to the reactor at Susquehanna was 1 in 76,923, according to an NRC study published in August 2010.[16][17]
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)