Greenhouse funding provides a "corrupting influence" on the science of global warming. Advocates of the global warming theory have dismissed arguments and evidence provided by opponents of the theory, on the grounds that (1) funding corrupts and (2) skeptical scientists "took money" from biased sources such as corporations that sell fossil fuels. But if funding corrupts, then what about the money from governments? ... the overwhelming majority of climate science is funded by government, and the competition for funding dollars is intense. [1]
Categories: [Environmentalism]