In which the esteemed "RealTrueNews" prove that Longroom.com was DESTROYED by the Clinton Foundation — in just one .jpg.[1]
“”Falsehood flies, and the Truth comes limping after it; so that when Men come to be undeceiv'd, it is too late; the Jest is over, and the Tale has had its Effect…
“”I do feel you should have as many news outlets as you can — especially since so many are fake.
—Trump, confusing real news he doesn't like with fake news[5]
Fake news refers to "news" that is blatantly false or otherwise distorted in the hopes of getting more clicks by feeding people the headlines they didn't know they wanted, in the hopes knowledge that shamelessly pandering to an agenda often proves sufficient to suspend the readers' disbelief. Depressing amounts of clicks can be garnered from fake news, simply by virtue of it posing as 'clear-cut examples', which (if true) would lend overwhelming apparent support to one side of the relevant multi-faceted, emotionally charged and complex issue. While fake news is a threat to common decency, one must admit that it is more entertaining than most normal news.
Fake news, in the form of propaganda and conspiracy theories, has been used to promote moral panics about sexual anxiety as a tactic of fascism. For example, the "Black Horror on the Rhine" moral panic in which German propagandists falsely claimed that French soldiers of African descent committed mass rape on women in the Rhineland following World War I.[6]:128-129,134[7]
With the growth of the 24-hour news cycle, major media outlets needed to fill numerous hours of airtime, so in addition to "news", they added opinion, commentary, analysis, speculation, and forecasting often centered around media personalities. This left them vulnerable to the charge of being labeled "fake news" themselves as traditional "news" was programmed adjacent to "narrative journalism".
It is important to distinguish between fake news on one hand, and mere biased reporting on the other.[note 2] Fake news denotes outright fabrication, while slanted reporting at least covers events which were not made up from whole cloth. Fake news should also be distinguished from yellow journalism, which may contain some truth, but is primarily intended to attract attention, rather than to inform or influence public opinion. Fake news outlets aren't just the equivalent of some leaflet guy ranting on a street corner. These are blogs, podcasts and shows which reach people in the millions — notably the young and poorly educated, unknowingly passing along the 'news' via social media — raking in tons of cash in illegitimately generated advertising revenue as a result.
This article documents fake news, clickbait news, distorted news, and satirical news.
Fake news has become an increasingly dangerous influence which helps sustain out-of-touch echo chambers on the Internet — and while that 'news' isn'treal, the emotions that are stirred up are. Things move fast with debunkings consistently 'behind the curve' — and by the time people figure out that some news piece was actually fake, they've already moved on (but not before internalizing 'that thing they read' as wholly confirmatory of their fears and frustrations).
And to make matters worse, in the current 'post-fact' era, the term "fake news" has devolved into a snarl word denoting "real news which conflict with my personal beliefs". A champion of misapplying the term, Donald Trump is fond of labeling any and all news outlets that report on his actual behavior as "fake news".[8][note 3]CNN is a common target, and it's common to hear the oft-repeated meme that the network is fake news, even if it's simply reporting on events.[10] Additionally, in February 2017, Trump said "all negative polls are fake news",[11] with his supporters not very far behind. This nonchalant watering down of the term is highly irresponsible, further misleading the already misled into dismissing the very phenomenon of "fake news" as being, in itself, fake news. Trump's misleading use of the term has led to (other) authoritarian regimes using the term for news they don't like, including Nicolás Maduro of Venezuela, Bashar al-Assad of Syria, the Myanmar government, Chinese state media, and the Russian foreign ministry.[12] In Egypt, under the Abdel Fattah el-Sisi regime, activist Amal Fathy posted a video on Facebook where she described being sexually harassed at a bank, and also criticized sexual harassment in general.[13] Because of this, the Egyptian government gave her a two-year jail sentence and a $560 fine based on the criminal charge of "spreading false news".[13]
“”[T]he history of the Trump administration has shown that the loudest cries of "fake news" accompany the most damning journalism. Coming from [Trump], the phrase now dependably has another meaning: "all-too-accurate reporting that damages my reputation."
Phishing has utilized fake news with malware delivery for many years. A link to "Obama SHOCKS WORLD with conversion to Islam" or "Donald Trump Dead From a Fatal HEART ATTACK!" is far more likely to be clicked by a victim than a bare link to http://lolmalware.hackedsite.ru/victim.php?email=youremail@example.com.[15]
Another form of fake news in relation to malware and cybercrime is the rise of counterfeit sites masquerading as otherwise reputable news outlets, with sensational articles ascribing a fictitious incident to a prominent celebrity often in relation to a "banks hate him"-style revelation where said celebrity is supposedly revealing their secret to financial success, luring potential victims to a cryptocurrency scam or some other get-rich-quick scheme[16] linked to a series of international organised crime syndicates running affiliate networks used to traffic and profit from such scams.[17] Such schemes – which nowadays involve emerging technologies like deepfake AI – prompted reputable media organisations in the Philippines such as ABS-CBN to put up announcements cautioning the public against unscrupulous entities making deepfaked videos posing as news anchors reporting patently false stories and/or celebrities supposedly shilling for what amounts to snake oil, and advising them to look out for visual anomalies that are consistent with a deepfake scam.[18]
In the world of journalism, fake news is surprisingly older than real news, as something resembling modern journalistic standards (truthfulness, accuracy, objectivity, impartiality, fairness, and public accountability) did not materialize until the early 20th century. Before that, the main concerns of journalists were selling papers and avoiding libel lawsuits. The late 19th century saw the rise of "yellow journalism", marked by sensationalistic headlines, fake interviews and pseudoscience.[21]Remember the Maine? In a sense, fake news can be traced back to various contestations over what was or was not historical fact, e.g., Plutarch's criticism of Herodotus' The Histories, as well as attempts at censoring the propagation of heterodoxreligious views within theocratic states.[22]
The earliest newspapers in anything approaching the modern sense arose during the European wars of religion (1524 to 1648 CE)[23][24] and tended to be highly propagandistic.[23] Savvy rulers soon took to censoring them to keep the people from being riled up too much. Even savvier rulers read the accounts of both or all sides to be able to better tell fact from fiction.
Fake news, at least of the satirical variety, has an honorable history. The first satirical publication was the PolishWiadomości Brukowe[note 4] (1816-1822), which was shut down by the Russian Empire. The best-known English language satire publication was the British Punch (1841-1992). The longest continually publishing satire publications are the Harvard Lampoon (1876-) and the lesser-known The Yale Record (1872-).[26]
British tabloids - July 5 2011
The old guard of fake news consists of tabloid journalism. In the UK, this is mainly Daily Mail, The Sun, and The Express. In the US, this is mainly National Enquirer, Weekly World News (defunct), and Globe. Of course, the world's most circulated newspapers are almost invariably tabloids or "boulevard" newspapers, the word "boulevard" being a reference to their method of distribution. Unlike major "serious" newspapers that mostly rely upon subscribers, a classical "boulevard" paper would be sold mostly or exclusively via small newspaper and tobacco stalls, and as such, had to attract readers passing along the boulevard with big pictures, screaming headlines, crime, violence, and nude flesh.
Mainstream news is not immune from creating fake news. Walter Duranty, reporting for The New York Times, even won a Pulitzer Prize in 1932 for what amounted to fake news. He was the Times' chief correspondent in Moscow and wrote uncritically about Josef Stalin, including Stalin's plans for Ukraine in what was to become the Holodomor.[27]
(Programs that make satire out of news like The Daily Show also call themselves "fake news", but aren't mentioned in this article since they talk about actual events. They also differ from satirical news such as The Onion, which are fake events for the most part but just for laughs.)
An inevitable consequence of discussing fake news with people that one might call the Wild Wild West alternative news source aficionados is the claim that "the mainstream media is the real fake news"[28] or something similar.[29] This seems understandable at first, given how sensationalist, poorly analyzed and balance-fallacy prone many major media institutions may be (especially television). The problem is that this tends to result in people turning their due cynicism of damaged institutions into paranoia, and obsessive rejection of all but the most extreme and even egregiously incorrect "alternative" sources.
—Donald Trump turning "fake news" into a snarl word[8]
As the internet has grown, cash-grabbing fake news sites have popped up freely. 2015 and 2016 saw an unprecedented wave of egregiously false bullshit channeled through Facebook, Twitter and good old-fashioned FWD:fwd:RE::emails ("remails"). The phenomenon has become so bad that Snopes, whose sole job is disproving this type of bullshit, admitted they could no longer cover it all, as "the bilge keeps coming faster than you can pump".[30]
Unsurprisingly, flooding the internet with alternative facts has adverse consequences:
In 2016, Oxford Dictionaries named "post-truth" their international word of the year.[31]
According to the author of ABCNews.com.co, "I think Donald Trump is in the White House because of me. His followers don't fact check anything."[32]
Communications professor Melissa Zimdars got so tired of seeing bullshit news that she compiled a list of "false, misleading, clickbaity, and satirical 'news' sources"; however, after receiving threats against her, she removed it.[33][34][35]
There are innumerable examples of people believing this shit.[36][37][38]
A powerful component of the spread of fake news has been "alternative news" sources, who exploit many people's due cynicism about major media outlets that often sensationalize, fail to adequately fact check, or oversimplify news. This exploitation takes the form of reframing those failures as complete uselessness, allowing them to insinuate their own sites as the sole source of truth, regardless of their own rather unconcerned attitude towards objectivity and fact.[39]
After pushback against fake news, The Atlantic notes that many fake news outlets have taken to cynically calling professional media outlets "fake news" in order to make the term even more meaningless.[40] This is on top of how the Trump White House found a way to perpetuate the narrative of labeling real news they don't like as fake news, according to a report by Business Insider:[41][42][43]
“”
Wait for a draft memo of a proposal to be leaked to the press.
Refuse to comment when asked about the draft.
Wait to dispute a story's accuracy until the story is published.
Accuse the press of never having sought comment to begin with.
Voilà, the press is now reporting the fake news that the White House provided.
“”We've tried to do similar things to liberals. It just has never worked, it never takes off. You'll get debunked within the first two comments and then the whole thing just kind of fizzles out.
There's some evidence that conservatives are more susceptible to fake news than liberals.[45]Psychologist John Jost found that several personality traits were correlated with conservatism, the most relevant of which to fake news was "need for cognition"[46] (enjoyment in critical thinking and deliberation): critical thinking was negatively correlated with conservatism in a review of 40 studies.[45] In reference to his small study on bullshit,[47] Stefan Pfattheicher, a psychologist at Ulm University, stated that conservatives "are less reflective in information processing, especially when information is consistent with [their] own worldviews."[45] Pfattheicher and Jost said that the differences were not about intelligence, and Pfattheicher further went on to say, "This seems to be more a matter of motivation to process information (or news) in a critical, reflective thinking style than the ability to do so."[45]
All that said, this research is not definitive, and some researchers (e.g. Daniel Kahan) have not found any conservative/liberal difference.[45][48] Moreover, it should be clear that this is a Hanlon's razor issue; even if conservatives are more susceptible to fake news, it would not be because they are malicious fake news mongers but instead victims of their own lack of skepticism.
Lack of corroboration: A real piece of news will be corroborated by multiple sources that don't just copy headlines from one another.[note 5] Twitter retweets, Reddit posts, and Facebook link sharing do not count.
Bias: If the editorial position of a site leans a certain way, they may be more inclined to create (or at the very least re-share) fabrications that support that leaning. Be especially wary of sources that support your own biases, especially viral posts from social media sites (Twitter posts that support your views are especially suspect); you'll be less able to identify the bullshit. A quality news story will contain independent views, not just reporting from one side of the story.
Story selection: Beware of sites that select stories that support a particular point of view. As historian Anne Applebaum writes, such sites "cherry-pick the news and emphasize particular details, to create anger, annoyance, and fear."[50]
Comments: If the site allows comments, there may be helpful comments in the article that point out the article's spin or accuracy. Of course, there are unhelpful comments or comments that knee-jerk agree or disagree with the article, but pay attention how they're written, especially if they're consistent with the fake news' aims of generating outrage. This also applies to Twitter posts, though it may be a bit more difficult to review Twitter posts without an account.
Presentation:
Ownership: If a website lacks disclosure about its ownership or funding, that is a serious sign of questionable credibility. Often, these types of websites appear to be "normal, local news sites" but mix "ordinary" information with highly partisan articles and headlines to attract people towards an extremist agenda, according to historian Anne Appelbaum.[50]
Overhyped consequences: Real news sites will (mostly) not wrap their stories in claims about the IMPENDING GLOBAL DISASTER or the COMPLETE DESTRUCTION of a political figure. In general, the shoutier the story, the less you should believe it.
Appeals to emotion: The more emotionally charged a story is, the more likely it is to generate clicks. Nothing drives traffic like angry people resharing the latest "outrage" related to children. If an article makes you angry, double-triple-check it and also ask yourself about the article's intentions such as playing into your emotions and biases. People have an incentive to lie in order to make you angry or afraid.
"Truth": Watch out for sites that liberally use "truth" to describe their content. There is none to be found. For example, the two main newspapers of the Soviet Union were Pravda (Правда, lit. "Truth") and Izvestia (Известия, lit. "News"). People would often joke, "In Pravda there is no news, and in Izvestia there is no truth."[51]
Weird URLs: In particular, the (fake) domain .com.co is often abused by sites that try to pass themselves as legitimate news sources.[note 6]
ALL CAPS: What more needs be said?
A 2017 analysis by researchers at Indiana University found that a small number of bots are responsible for the spread of much fake news on social media.[53]
Fake news is known to appeal to several fallacious argument styles:[54]
“”Let’s say I call myself the Institute for Something-or-other and I decide to promote a spurious treatise saying the Jews were entirely responsible for the second world war and the Holocaustdidn’t happen. And it goes out there on the Internet and is available on the same terms as any piece of historical research which has undergone peer review and so on. There’s a kind of parity of esteem of information on the net. It’s all there: there’s no way of finding out whether this stuff has any bottom to it or whether someone has just made it up.
These sites make up the vast majority of the clog in people's news feeds. Sometimes they publish truth; sometimes they publish discreditable nonsense. Everything they publish, however, supports their worldview and doesn't acknowledge any valid opposing viewpoints. Many former fake news sites are offline as of January 2018. If you still want to go have a good laugh at them, we recommend looking them up on Archive.org or archive.ph.
They fall into two categories:
Earnest biased/fake news: These sites earnestly strive to present fact-devoid rants about utter nonsense in order to push a specific class of bullshit, usually pseudoscience, conspiracy theories, religiousideology, or a political ideology. (The people behind these websites may earnestly believe what they preach. That fact doesn't prevent these websites from lacking facts altogether.) Scopie's Law applies.
Opportunistic biased/fake news: These sites earnestly strive to get clicks, just clicks. If they push an agenda, they don't do it intentionally; these sites are utterly unconcerned with the truth. (Clicks and ad revenue aren't ideological; neither are these sites.) Opportunistic sites like these often invent plausible but utterly untrue (i.e. clickbait) headlines (e.g. "I was paid $3,500 to protest against Donald Trump")[57] in order to maximize sharing on social media (and therefore clicks). Oh, and did we mention that they're just click-hungry advertisers?
Jestin Coler (1976–) was the owner of several fake news sites under the umbrella company Disinfomedia, Inc. using his pseudonym Allen Montgomery.[58][59][44] The sites included NationalReport.net, USAToday.com.co, WashingtonPost.com.co[note 7] and briefly the Denver Guardian.[58][44] DisInfoMedia's focus was initially on trolling the alt-right, with the aim of luring the alt-right into republishing the fake stories and thereby discrediting them.[58] As advertising revenue increased, the focus began to shift into pushing the envelope.[58] After Facebook changed its algorithm to slow traffic from fake news sites, Coler decided to switch the focus to satire.[58] Eventually, Coler closed all of his fake news sites after concluding that despite the money he was not proud of what he had done and did not appreciate the stress.[58] Coler's conclusions from the experience are:[58]
Money is the primary motivation for fake news sites.
Both ends of the political spectrum are susceptible to fake news.
"The idea of limiting speech is far more dangerous to democracy than fake news."
In November 2016, Paul Horner (1978–2017) revealed himself to be the writer behind abcnews.com.co and other unnamed fake news sites.[61] CNN.com.de was likely one of the other news sites, since Horner admitted writing at least some of the stories there and the both ABCNews.com.co and CNN.com.de shared stories written by the pseudonymous Jimmy Rustling. Horner partly blamed himself for the election of Donald Trump[62] In an interview, Horner indicated that he did not understand the difference between satire ("humor, irony, exaggeration, or ridicule to expose and criticize people's stupidity or vices") and outright fake news that is designed to deceive.[61]
Headline: "Donald Trump Protester Speaks Out: 'I Was Paid $3,500 To Protest Trump’s Rally' "[57] (authored by "Jimmy Rustling"[note 8]; debunked by PolitiFact[68]). This was one of the stories copped to by Horner, "And that's just insane. I've gone to Trump protests — trust me, no one needs to get paid to protest Trump. I just wanted to make fun of that insane belief, but it took off. They actually believed it."[61]
Headline: "Obama Signs Executive Order Declaring Investigation Into Election Results; Revote Planned For Dec. 19th"[69] (authored by Jimmy Rustling; debunked by Snopes[70])
Headline: "The Amish In America Commit Their Vote To Donald Trump; Mathematically Guaranteeing Him A Presidential Victory"[71] (authored by Jimmy Rustling; debunked by Snopes[72]) (one of the stories copped to by Horner[62])
Headline: "Fireman Suspended & Jailed By Atheist Mayor For Praying At Scene Of Fire"[73] debunked by Snopes[74]) (one of the stories copped to by Horner[61])
Headline: "President Obama Signs Executive Order Banning The Sale Of Assault Weapons"[75] (authored by Jimmy Rustling; debunked by Snopes[76])
Headline: "Gay Wedding Mobile Vans Cashing In On The Legalization Of Gay Marriage"[77] (authored by Jimmy Rustling, and one of the stories copped to by Horner[62])
Headline: "BREAKING: Capitol Hill Shooter Identified as Right Wing Extremist"[78] (one of the stories copped to by Horner[61])
Born at an early age, Jimmy Rustling has found solace and comfort knowing that his humble actions have made this multiverse a better place for every man, woman and child ever known to exist. Dr. Jimmy Rustling has won many awards for excellence in writing including fourteen Peabody awards and a handful of Pulitzer Prizes. When Jimmies are not being Rustled the kind Dr. enjoys being an amazing husband to his beautiful, soulmate; Anastasia, a Russianmail order bride of almost 2 months. Dr. Rustling also spends 12-15 hours each day teaching their adopted 8-year-old Syrian refugee daughter how to read and write.
Headline: "HUD Wants To Make Living In A Tiny House Or RV Illegal"[82] (Snopes respectfully calls bullshit[83])
Headline: "Sheriff’s Dept To Fine People $1K For Bringing In Food And Supplies To Standing Rock"[84] (Snopes disagrees[85])
Headline: "Obama Calls Alternative Media 'Domestic Propagandists' "[86]
Headline: "The Establishment’s Plan To Divide: Donald Trump, Fake News, And Russia"[87] (Just read the first paragraph. If you didn't cringe, there's something wrong.)
Headline: "Establishment Media Declares War On Their Competition As 'Fake News' "[88]
Headline: "Sacrificing Children To The State Of California: SB18"[89]
Headline: "The Truth About Mandatory Vaccines"[90]
Headline: "How The Government Is Turning Legal Marijuana Into A Massive Surveillance State"[91]
Headline: "Donald Trump Signs Executive Order Which Cancels Saturday Night Live"[128]
Headline: "Trump To Build World's Largest Stadium Around Section Of Wall For 'Mexican Gladiator Battles': 'If They Make It Over My Wall, They Can Stay' "[129]
Headline: "Obama Signs Executive Order Banning The National Anthem At All Sporting Events Nationwide"[130] (one of the stories copped to by Horner[62])
Headline: "Donald Trump Signs Executive Order Banning The Pledge Of Allegiance In Schools Nationwide: 'Needs More God' "[131]
Content: "Fappy The Anti-MasturbationDolphin, a mascot for a Christian organization that travels around the country educating children about the dangers and consequences of masturbation, told CNN he believes what Trump is doing is the right thing."[132] (debunked by Snopes[133])
Headline: "Alex Jones Harassed & Threatened With a Gun For Supporting Trump"[161] — And not because of the fact that he's Alex Jones? Find that hard to believe.
Headline: "Proof: Wholesome Americana Thrives Despite Increasingly Vicious Left: Smalltown America is alive and well"[162] — Yes, those down to Earth, sane infowarriors that enjoy "honorable traditions" such as harassing gay and trans people. Damn those sick leftists, they're ruining America.
Headline: "Soros & Hillary Launch Purple Revolution Against Trump: Globalists try to usurp power from the people"[163]
Headline: "Dems Declare War On Free Press: Big Government Libs Trying To Control Access To Information"[164] Because big-government Cons never try to hide things from the public.
Headline: "Shock Video: Police Force 80-Year-Old Italian Hotel Owner To House African Migrants: Government Confiscates Private Property To Accommodate 'Refugees' "[165]
Headline: "Clintons Begging Trump to Stop Investigation of Hillary Through Chelsea: Trump Must Drain the Clinton Crime Family with the Rest of The Swamp"[166]
Headline: "Clinton Campaign Admits Making False Claims Against Trump Print: Campaign intentionally conspires to deceive public"[167]
Tweet: "New York Times warns Hillary campaign in advance of stories they are about to publish."[168] (debunked by Snopes[169])
Headline: "Drunk Driver Blames Crash on Trump"[170]
Headline: "Breaking: Internal Coup In Clinton Camp Will Ruin Her"[171]
Document: "PUBLIC NOTICE Thursday, March 7, 2013 CANADA IS DISSOLVED"[183] — to be replaced by the "Republic of Kanata", which he still talks about to this day[184]
Kevin Annett discusses how he personally destroyed globalism on 01 August 2011[185]
Headline: "Biotech Genocide, Monsanto Collaborators And The Nazi Legacy Of 'Science' As Justification For Murder" (which insinuates that some scientists should be killed)[207][note 12]
Headline: "People who grow their own food labeled 'extremist' by Dept. of Defense"[209]
Headline: "Principle of astrology proven to be scientific: planetary position imprints biological clocks of mammals"[210] (debunked by Phil Plait[211])
Headline: "Whole Foods Market (WFM) continues to knowingly sell poison to its customers: Natural News seeks class action law firm to pursue legal action"[212]
Headline: "Ten mind-blowing, historic events you will likely witness in the next 100 days"[213]
“”Disinformation comes from seemingly reliable sources. It is extremely important for you to not gather false knowledge as it is more damaging than no knowledge at all.
Headline: "HAARP, Weather, Roswell Rods, 4th Density Battles & Bleedthrough and 7th Density"[221]
Headline: "Death squads, pedophiles and psychopaths: Inside the British establishment"[222]
Headline: "Dallas police shootings: Social Engineering and the American Police State"[223]
Headline: "Harmony: The neuroscience of singing"[224]
Biased or dishonest representation of real news[edit]
A favorite of political fake news on the marginally more legitimate sites includes completely out-of-context quotes that often say the opposite of what the in context quote says, complete misrepresentations of the intent, or cause of actions by political leaders, suggesting a recent policy or action will result in an extreme version of the policy (often freely intermingled with conspiracy theories), treating a recurring or regular event like a sudden new innovation and a threat to [insert your political affiliation here].
Oxford University researcher Phil Howard has characterized these types of websites as "junk news" when they meet at least 3 of 5 criteria:[225][226]
failing to meet the best practices of professional journalism
using emotionally driven language
relying on false information or conspiracy theories
using highly biased reporting
relying on counterfeit of established news outlets
Headline: "Flattening the curve or flattening the global poor? How Covid lockdowns obliterate human rights and crush the most vulnerable"[259]
Headline: "Venezuela’s socialists win elections in landslide – so US tries to discredit them"[260]
Headline: "Billionaire political meddlers, disinformation agents launch ‘Good Information Inc.’ to fight disinformation" (with George Soros conspiracy-mongering as an added bonus!)[261]
Headline: "Behind the ‘Uyghur Tribunal’, US govt-backed separatist theater to escalate conflict with China"[262]
Headline: "Ukrainian ultranationalist lobby flaunts influence over Biden, blocks top Russia expert’s appointment"[263]
Occasionally has transcripts of wingnuttery similar to Right Wing Watch.
Why it's exaggerated:
Headline: " 'This is our moment': Trump's win emboldens activist behind effort to 'make rape legal' " (while Roosh V is despicable, he has never explicitly linked Trump to rape legalization)[290]
Headline: " 'I voted for Trump!': White customer demands special privileges in Starbucks meltdown"[291]
Headline: "Baltimore teacher loses her cool and tells 'punk-ass n****r' students they’re 'gonna get shot' "[292]
Headline: "Trump fans try to 'punish' Starbucks by writing his name on cups — and the internet is cracking up"[293]
Headline: "Van Jones: I love Jeffrey Lord — he's like a 'Fraggle' who believes 'terrible revisionist history' "[294]
Headline: "Black college students kicked out of Trump rally in Georgia for no reason".[295] This is according to students but according to staff, the students were disruptive involving using profanities and cutting in line, arguing with the detail after being asked to leave.[296]
Openly being a state-run nationalistic Russian propaganda outlet.[305][306] Known particularly for trashing the United States on pretty much everything. Which isn't necessarily a bad thing; the problem is, RT usually criticizes the US because of things that aren't true.
Being labelled "Russia's main international media weapon" by the European Parliament[307]
Headline: "Black Mobs Plague Nightclubs Coast to Coast"[338]
Headline: "Family picnic turns to horror thanks to black mob."[339] (WND's used the "black mob" trope so frequently that Google banned them from their Ads service and branded WND a hate site.)
Headline: "Combat soldiers no match for black mob."[340] (Yes, this was an actual headline from a website that claims to be "…an independent news company dedicated to uncompromising journalism, seeking truth and justice and revitalizing the role of the free press as a guardian of liberty.")[341]
This category contains open satire: satire that tells you it's satire. These are the least harmful variety of fake news, and can genuinely do some good while providing a few yucks. (Despite this, many people accidentally share stories from these while assuming they're real.)[36]
The Babylon Bee is a satirical site, launched in March 1, 2016, for evangelical Christians, including trying to parody left-wing views (Babylon Bee relies on the typical evangelical bigotry and persecution complex; they have predictable, transphobia that pass off as jokes).[348][349] The news models itself after The Onion, similar to ResistanceHole, a subsidary of Clickhole[350] (see The Onion). While it flails in its attempts to lampoon the left, the writers are also not afraid to try to poke copious amounts of fun at the other side, as well as evangelicals themselves.[351][352][353][354]
Headline: "That Annoying Friend Who Loves Winter Doomed to 6 Months of Decent Weather"[404]
Headline: "Trump Rushes Emergency Planeload of His Hats to Flood-Ravaged Louisiana"[405]
Content: " 'Sesame Street is the sort of liberal fairy crap kids are watching today,' Fox News owner Ruper Murdoch[sic] told Fox News entertainer Bill O'Reilly in making the announcement on-air today. 'Liberals dressed up in goof-ass costumes prancing around filling kids' heads with garbage about how special they are and how even Muslim and homosexual children are just the same as them and how the letter 'E' stands for 'Environment' and they should be kind to it.' "[406]
Headline: "Ben Carson 'Stranded' in Middle of Escalator After Stairs Stop Moving"[407]
Special report: "Nation Fills Up On Bread: Despite repeated warnings from federal officials not to eat too much before their entree arrives, an alarming 89 percent of U.S. citizens filled up on bread Monday, leaving them too full to enjoy the rest of their meal."[408]
Headline: "Ambassador Stages Coup At UN, Issues Long List of Non-Binding Resolutions"[409]
Blog post by Donald Trump: "When You're Feeling Low, Just Remember I'll Be Dead In About 15 Or 20 Years"[410]
Headline: "Trump Vomits Immediately After Seeing Everyday Americans Up Close"[411]
Headline: "Breitbart Traffic Down As Readers Now Getting Bulk Of News Analysis From Graffiti Scrawled Across Neighborhood"[412]
Headline: "Finding Common Ground: This White Man And This Muslim Woman Both Have 'Trump' Painted On Their Garages"[413]
The Onion was even more likely to fool someone prior to 2013, when it was published in a literal print format in numerous cities, and mixed legitimate music and film reviews with its regular satire.
Despite its name and its semi-professional layout, this is very much a satirical *fake* news website. Features absurd articles similar to those on The Onion. The site does not explicitly state that it is satire, but if headlines such as "Barack Obama Reinstated as 44th President of the United States Following Military Coup" do not make it obvious enough, it can also be inferred from the about page of the site.[414]
RealTrueNews started out pretending to be a real news website but by the end of November 2016 the owner of the site, Marco Chacon, admitted that the site was satire.[419] Sometime after Chacon's article in The Daily Beast,[419] the site included "Fake, But Accurate" under its logo on the main page,[420] and including "RealTrueNews / The Resistor is Satire. It's sad we have to say this—but we do. Nothing on here is remotely real." on their "About" page.[421]
Satirical fact checking ("Finally: Patrioic Fact-Checking You Can Trust. Don't Fall For the Liberal Lies and Clinton News Network 'Journolism.' Get Real. True. Facts. When Your Liberal Cousin Sends You To Snopes, Send Them Here Instead.")[422]
Why it's fake/distorted:
Headline: "Mansplainer: Why Didn't They Repeal Obamacare?"[423]
Headline: "Man Terrified of Learning Anything New About 'Q' "[424]
Headline: "RNC 2018 Message 'OK To Say N-Word Again' "[425]
CNN, which has a lot of critics, but is not fake news despite the continuous broken records saying it is.
Conservapedia, which deliberately misdescribes the nature of fake news (cp:Fake News), and which could be summarized as news with which Donald Trump or Conservapedia editors disagree. Unsurprisingly, Conservapedia also gives uncritical reviews of low quality news sites (cp:Breitbart News, cp:Infowars, cp:Russia Today, and cp:WND).
Fox news, which is not fake news in their actual news reporting (although they came dangerously close with their coverage of the 2020 U.S. presidential election), but you still shouldn't trust it to provide information (primarily because their commentators, e.g., Sean Hannity, have been known to promote baseless conspiracy theories and otherwise mislead their viewers such as doctoring photos and fabricating statistics).
Media Bias Fact Check: Almost always accurately gauges the political (left-right), scientific (pro-anti), and conspiracist (pro-anti) measures of a news organization
↑"People are saying…", "Some people say…", and "Our sources tell us…" are vague weasel words that don't count as sources without additional specific information on how they relate to the issue at hand (e.g. "Sources within the State Department tell us…" or "A person who wishes to remain anonymous at the scene of the accident told us…")
↑The .co country-level domain is popular because it looks like the more popular .com domain so one can easily create fake website that have URLs that look like legitimate URLs. Also, the .co domain was delegated by the Colombian government to a commercial entity and there is no restriction on use of second-level domains, thus allowing .com.co or .net.co or whatever.[52]
↑Coler lost an arbitration lawsuit by the real Washington Post against his fake WashingtonPost.com.co, based on bad-faith cybersquatting.[60]
↑One SciBabe article suggests that NaturalNews is satire; the article itself is satire: "Yes, this article is satire. Every word, except to the links to Natural News. He actually said all of that shit. You’re welcome."[204]
↑After facing intense backlash, they later changed the headline to "Science for sale: The true history of silencing whistleblowers with corporate science".[208]
↑(Article by Jonathan Swift) 1710 November 2 to November 9, The Examiner, Number 15, , Quote Page 2, Column 1, Printed for John Morphew, near Stationers-Hall, London.
↑How Fascism Works: The Politics of Us and Them by Jason Stanley (2018) Random House. ISBN 9780525511830.
↑"The 'Black Horror on the Rhine': Race as a Factor in Post-World War I Diplomacy" by Keith L. Nelson (1970) The Journal of Modern History (42)4:606-627.
↑YouTube, Facebook and Apple shut down Alex Jones channels (Aug 6, 2018) CNN via Youtube. Retrieved August 16 2018. Note: check the comments section of the video; it's very, very common to see detractors label CNN as fake news even though Alex Jones' termination from major platforms is a real event.
↑CNN is Fake News by David Shephard (December 13, 2016) The Bull Elephant. "Now that Dan Rather is retired CNN is the biggest propagator of fake news in the country." "Climate Change" being an example of their unfair fake news propagated by CNN.
↑ 36.036.1Literally Unbelievable (archived from April 1, 2018). A tremendous collection of examples of gullible fools misled people was te be found at the "Literally Unbelievable" blog.
↑Daily Stormer entry, Media Bias/Fact Check 12 December 2021. "Overall, we rate the Daily Stormer Questionable based on Extreme Right Bias, promotion of propaganda and conspiracies, as well as simply being a vile hate group. This source is not worthy of a click."
↑Shock Video: Police Force 80-Year-Old Italian Hotel Owner To House African Migrants: Government Confiscates Private Property To Accommodate 'Refugees' by Paul Joseph Watson (November 18, 2016) Infowars.com (Archived from November 29, 2016).
↑National Enquirer entry, Media Bias/Fact Check 16 September 2021. "Overall, we rate the National Enquirer Questionable based on the routine publishing of sensational or fake news stories."
↑Computational Propaganda: Political Parties, Politicians, and Political Manipulation on Social Media, edited by Samuel C. Woolley & Philip N. Howard (2018) Oxford University Press. ISBN 0190931418.
↑The Grayzone profile. Media Bias/Fact Check, 20 January 2022. "Overall, we rate The Grayzone Far-Left Biased and Questionable based on the promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, and consistent one-sided reporting."
↑LifeSiteNews profile. Media Bias/Fact Check, 8 June 2021. "We rate LifeSiteNews far right biased for story selection that always favors evangelical Christianity and Questionable based on the promotion of conspiracy theories, pseudoscience, and many failed fact checks."
↑One America News Network profile.Media Bias/Fact Check, 3 July 2021. "Overall, we rate One America News Questionable based on far-right bias, lack of sourcing, promotion of conspiracy theories, and propaganda, as well as numerous failed fact checks. OAN is not a credible news source."