From Ballotpedia As students returned to school for the 2021-2022 school year, states set a variety of policies on education and the COVID-19 pandemic, including how schools should open to in-person instruction and whether students and staff would be required to wear masks. By the end of the 2020-2021 school year, about 66% of students nationwide were in states that left closure decisions to schools or districts, 33% were in states with state-ordered in-person instruction, and 1% were in states with state-ordered regional school closures.[1][2] All 50 states closed schools to in-person instruction at some point during the 2019-2020 school year in response to the coronavirus pandemic.
This article summarizes responses to the coronavirus in Connecticut schools in the academic years ending in 2020, 2021, and 2022. You will find:
Ballotpedia’s coverage of COVID-19 includes how federal, state, and local governments are responding, and how those responses are influencing election rules and operations, political campaigns, the economy, schools, and more.
This page is updated monthly, but our email is always open. We encourage you to share updates from local officials, policymakers, and campaigns in your community at editor@ballotpedia.org.
Below is a list of major events involving schools in Connnecticut during the coronavirus pandemic between 2019 and 2022, including school closings and openings, mask requirements, and the release of statewide operating guidance. Know of something we missed? Click here to email us and let us know.
As of August 1, 2022, no states had school mask requirements in effect. Forty-two states left mask requirements in schools up to local authorities. Seven states banned school mask requirements.
The table below shows statewide school mask requirement laws and orders in states with school mask requirements or school mask requirement bans in place at the end of the 2021-2022 school year.
| Mask requirement orders | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| State | Ban or requirement? | Type of order | Date lifted or altered |
| Arizona | Ban | Legislative action | N/A |
| Arkansas | Ban | Legislative action | Sept. 30, 2021 - Suspended by court action |
| California | Requirement | California Department of Public Health order | March 12, 2022 - Lifted by executive action |
| Connecticut | Requirement | Executive order | Feb. 28, 2022 - Lifted by executive action |
| Delaware | Requirement | Executive order | March 1, 2022 - Lifted by executive action |
| Florida | Ban | Executive order | N/A[19] |
| Georgia | Ban | Legislative action | N/A |
| Hawaii | Requirement | Executive order | Aug. 1, 2022 - Lifted by executive action |
| Illinois | Requirement | Illinois Department of Public Health order | Feb. 4, 2022 - Suspended by court action[20] |
| Iowa | Ban | Legislative action | May 16, 2022 - Reinstated by court action[21] |
| Kentucky | Requirement | Kentucky Board of Education order | Sept. 9, 2021 - Suspended by state law |
| Louisiana | Requirement | Executive order | Feb. 16, 2022 - Lifted by executive action[22] |
| Maryland | Requirement | Maryland State Board of Education order | March 1, 2022 - Lifted by executive action[23] |
| Massachusetts | Requirement | Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education order | Feb. 28, 2022 - Lifted by executive action[24] |
| Nevada | Requirement | Executive order | Feb. 10, 2022 - Lifted by executive action |
| New Jersey | Requirement | Executive order | March 7, 2022 - Lifted by executive action |
| New Mexico | Requirement | New Mexico Public Education Department order | Feb. 17, 2022 - Lifted by executive action |
| New York | Requirement | Executive order | March 3, 2022 - Lifted by executive action |
| Oklahoma | Ban | Executive order | N/A |
| Oregon | Requirement | Oregon Health Authority and Department of Education order | March 12, 2022 - Lifted by executive action |
| Pennsylvania | Requirement | Pennsylvania Department of Health order | Dec. 10, 2021 - Suspended by court action |
| Rhode Island | Requirement | Executive order | March 4, 2022 - Lifted by executive action |
| South Carolina | Ban | Legislative action | Sept. 28, 2021 - Temporarily suspended by court action |
| Tennessee | Ban | Executive order | Dec. 10, 2021 - Suspended by court action |
| Texas | Ban | Executive order | N/A[25] |
| Utah | Ban | Legislative action | N/A |
| Virginia | Ban | Legislative action | N/A |
| Washington | Requirement | Washington State Department of Public Health order | March 12, 2022 - Lifted by executive action |
Seven states had issued a statewide requirement for K-12 teachers and staff to be vaccinated against the coronavirus or receive regular coronavirus testing during the 2021-2022 school year. The table below shows teacher and staff vaccine requirement laws and orders in states that issued such policies during the 2021-2022 school year.
| Vaccine requirement orders | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| State | Testing instead of vaccination allowed? | Type of order | Date effective |
| California | Yes | California Department of Public Health order | Oct. 15, 2021 |
| Connecticut | No | Executive order | Sept. 27, 2021 |
| Delaware | Yes | Executive order | Nov. 1, 2021 |
| Illinois | Yes | Executive order | Issued: Sept. 19, 2021 Suspended by court action on Feb. 4, 2022 |
| New Jersey | Yes | Executive order | Oct. 18, 2021 |
| New York | Yes | Executive order | Sept. 19, 2021 |
| Oregon | No | Executive order | Oct. 18, 2021 |
| Washington | No | Executive order | Oct. 18, 2021 |
On Oct. 1, 2021, California was the first state to announce a vaccine requirement for eligible students. Louisiana also announced a vaccine requirement for eligible students on Dec. 14, but then announced the state would be removing the coronavirus vaccine from the list of required immunizations in schools on May 18, 2022.
Connecticut released an initial operating plan for the 2020-2021 school year on June 25, 2020. An analysis of this plan appeared in our Documenting America's Path to Recovery newsletter on August 4. The sections below include an analysis of the plan, the details of the plan, and reactions from officials to the plan.
On June 25, Gov. Ned Lamont (D) and Education Commissioner Miguel Cardona announced “Adapt, Advance, Achieve: Connecticut’s Plan to Learn and Grow Together,” a reopening framework centered around six guiding principles and a series of operational considerations. The plan includes a mixture of requirements and optional guidance based on best practices. The plan was last updated on Aug. 3.
Lamont said, “While we’ve made good strides to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 in Connecticut, the virus hasn’t gone away and we need to do what we can to keep students and staff safe while also doing our best to provide our young people with access to an education that prepares them for the future. Working with public health and medical experts, and with the support of our educators, we are preparing a number of steps that protect the health and safety of everyone who makes contact with our school system.”
According to EdWeek, Connecticut schools typically start the last week in August. The Connecticut State Department of Education asks districts to plan for all students to return to classrooms this fall so long as public health continued to support the state’s school reopening model.
On March 15, Lamont first ordered schools closed to in-person instruction from March 16 to March 31. He extended the closures on March 23 and April 9, before closing schools to in-person instruction for the remainder of the academic year on May 5.
Connecticut is a Democratic trifecta. The governor is a Democrat, and Democrats have majorities in both chambers of the state legislature. The state became a Democratic trifecta in 2011.
The following tables show public education statistics in Connecticut, including a rank comparing it to the other 49 states. Rank one is the highest number of each figure, rank 50 is the lowest. All data comes from the Common Core of Data provided by the National Center for Education Statistics.
| Connecticut school metrics | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Figure | Rank |
| Per pupil spending (16-17) | $21,628 | 2 |
| Number of students (18-19) | 514,698 | 30 |
| Number of teachers (Fall 2016) | 42,343 | 26 |
| Number of public schools (18-19) | 1,023 | 35 |
| Student:teacher ratio (18-19) | 12.3 | 45 |
| Percent qualifying for free/reduced lunch (16-17) | 35.7% | 48 |
| Connecticut school revenue | ||
|---|---|---|
| Category | Figure | Rank |
| Total revenue | $11,376,740,000 | 18 |
| Federal revenue percent | 4.2% | 49 |
| State revenue percent | 41% | 37 |
| Local revenue percent | 54.8% | 8 |
District reopening plans
All Local Education Agencies (LEAs), including charter schools, were required to submit reopening plans to the Connecticut State Department of Education by July 24. The State Department of Education said while it would not approve the plans, it would hold on to the plans in case schools required technical assistance.
The guidance states:
| “ |
While the guiding principles of this document will require all LEAs to approach this with a certain level of consistency, LEAs retain discretion in implementing the approach to full time reopening. School boards are encouraged to develop local teams and secure input from all members of the community regarding the complex approach to resuming classes in the fall. The CSDE will stand ready to provide technical support and anticipates that this document will be followed by ongoing support documents, resources, and a variety of templates to assist local planning.[26] |
” |
In-person, hybrid, and online learning
The plan says schools should plan to return students to classrooms in the fall, so long as the public health data supports doing so.
| “ |
LEAs should plan to have all students, in all districts, return to schoolhouses for fulltime instruction at the beginning of 2020–2021, so long as public health data continues to support this model. This model will be supported with more intensive mitigation strategies and specific monitoring, containment and class cancellation plans. In addition to full-time instruction plans as indicated above, LEAs must be prepared to modify their plans to support a partial reopening or to allow for scaling back at a future date if the public health data changes.[26] |
” |
The plan also says schools should: “Plan for educational opportunities to be primarily in-person, but allow for students and parents to choose not to participate based upon individual considerations.”
The plan includes a tiered system for helping schools determine which education model to adopt. The “Low”, “Moderate,” and “High” tiers correspond to the spread of COVID-19 in an area.
In the “Low” category, schools can operate “up to 100% capacity, students/staff with underlying medical conditions should consider restrictions and blended/remote learning." Buses can operate “up to full capacity with bus monitors recommended, facial coverings in place during transit, controlled loading/unloading of riders.”
In the “Medium” category, schools can operate “at reduced capacity, with more reliance on hybrid model, blended/remote learning, prioritize access to school building for students who need the more learning support, including but not limited to those receiving special education, ELs or limited access due to devices or connectivity issues.” Buses can operate at “reduced capacity with bus monitors strongly recommended, facial coverings in place during transit, controlled loading/unloading of riders, spaced seating between unrelated riders.” The plan also calls for indoor extracurricular activities to be suspended.
In the “High” category, schools are “closed, 100% remote learning, bus transportation suspended, extracurricular activities, including sports, should be suspended.”
The plan requires schools to do the following:
| “ |
|
” |
Mask requirements
The plan requires staff and students to wear face coverings when inside school buildings and provides suggestions for communicating those policies.
The plan requires the following:
| “ |
|
” |
Other suggestions include:
| “ |
|
” |
In-person health recommendations and requirements
The plan requires the following for classroom layout:
| “ |
|
” |
The plan encourages schools to sort students into stable cohorts.
| “ |
|
” |
Transportation and busing requirements and restrictions
The plan includes the following recommendations for preparation:
| “ |
|
” |
The plan includes the following recommendations for pick up/drop off:
| “ |
|
” |
On June 25, Connecticut Education Association (CEA) President Jeff Leake and AFT Connecticut Vice President Mary Yordon released a statement in response to Lamont’s reopening plan:
| “ |
Governor Lamont’s plan, released today, is short on specifics and doesn’t address some of the most pressing issues associated with reopening our buildings this fall. The new plan raises many concerns and leaves dozens of unanswered questions regarding how schools will operate in a COVID-19 (novel coronavirus) world. Simply directing district officials to follow generic CDC (Centers for Disease Control) recommendations, without customizing requirements for the realities of our school settings, is insufficient for a safe statewide reopening.[26] |
” |
The map below shows the status of school reopenings and closures at the end of the 2020-2021 academic year.
As of July 8, 2021, the status of school closures and reopenings was as follows:
The map below shows the status of school reopenings and closures at the end of the 2019-2020 academic year.
The chart below shows the first date schools in a state were closed to in-person instruction during the 2019-2020 academic year, divided by the political party of the governor.
To read about school responses to the coronavirus pandemic in other states, click one of the following links below:
The chart below shows coronavirus statistics from countries across the world. The information is provided by Real Clear Politics.
Click the links below to explore official resources related to the coronavirus outbreak.
Categories: [Coronavirus school reopening plans by state, 2020]