From Ballotpedia | Lincoln Strategy Group | |
| Basic facts | |
| Location: | Tempe, Ariz. and San Francisco, Calif. |
| Type: | Corporation |
| Top official: | Nathan Sproul, Managing Director |
| Founder(s): | Nathan Sproul and Meghan Cox |
| Website: | Official website |
The Lincoln Strategy Group (LSG) is a campaign management and corporate public affairs firm with offices in Tempe, Arizona, and San Francisco, California. The company was founded by Nathan Sproul and Meghan Cox.[1]
According to the LSG website, the company offers campaign strategy, public affairs and government relations, strategic research, voter identification, get out the vote campaigns, ballot access, grassroots engagement, voter contact, and advertising services.[2]
| Petition Companies |
|---|
|
Below is a list of payments made to LSG by political campaigns.[3]

Influencers in American politics are power players who help get candidates elected, put through policy proposals, cause ideological changes, and affect popular perceptions. They can take on many forms: politicians, lobbyists, advisors, donors, corporations, industry groups, labor unions, single-issue organizations, nonprofits, to name a few.
In 2016, Ballotpedia identified Lincoln Strategy Group as a top influencer by state. We identified top influencers across the country through several means, including the following:
The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms Lincoln Strategy Group. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.
Lincoln Strategy Group - Google News
| |||||||
![]() |
Signature requirements |
|---|---|
| Signature requirements |
Alabama • Alaska • Arizona • Arkansas • California • Colorado • Connecticut • Delaware • Florida • Georgia • Hawaii • Idaho • Illinois • Indiana • Iowa • Kansas • Kentucky • Louisiana • Maine • Maryland • Massachusetts • Michigan • Minnesota • Mississippi • Missouri • Montana • Nebraska • Nevada • New Hampshire • New Jersey • New Mexico • New York • North Carolina • North Dakota • Ohio • Oklahoma • Oregon • Pennsylvania • Rhode Island • South Carolina • South Dakota • Tennessee • Texas • Utah • Vermont • Virginia • Washington • West Virginia • Wisconsin • Wyoming |
| Petition companies |
American Petition Consultants • Arno Political Consultants • Bader & Associates, Inc. • Canvasser Services • Capitol Assets • Democracy Direct • Democracy Resources • Discovery Petition Management • FieldWorks • JSM, Inc. • Kimball Petition Management • LAMM Political Partners, LLC • Masterson & Wright • National Ballot Access • National Petition Management • National Solutions • National Voter Outreach • PCI Consultants, Inc. |
| Terms |
Approved for circulation • Initiative petition circulation periods • Circulator • Circulator affidavit • Forged signature • Fraudulent signature • Invalid signature • Paid circulator • Petition • Random sampling • Registered voter • Signature certification • Signer • Signer intent • Valid signature • Volunteer circulator • Signature transcription |
| Petition drive deadlines |
2008 deadlines • 2009 deadlines • 2010 deadlines • 2011 deadlines • 2012 deadlines • 2013 deadlines • 2014 deadlines • 2015 deadlines • 2016 deadlines • 2017 deadlines • 2018 deadlines • 2019 deadlines • 2020 deadlines • 2021 deadlines • 2022 deadlines • 2023 deadlines • 2024 deadlines • 2025 deadlines |
| Signature law |
States where signature requirements are based on votes cast for governor |
Categories: [Petition_management_companies_and_personnel]