National Petition Management

Petition Companies

National Petition Management is a company that offers signature gathering services to ballot initiative campaigns.

About[edit]

National Petition Management was incorporated in California on October 4, 1995. As of 2022, Lee Albright was the company's chief executive officer. On its website, the company said, "At NPM we have qualified dozens of initiatives and referenda across the country. Our staff has attained a near perfect track record in the worst of conditions and shortest time frames on a wide range of issues. In fact, we have set records doing it! We are so sure we’ll succeed with your issue that we guarantee it. If the percentage of valid signatures falls below our contracted rate we will make up the difference – at our own expense."^[1][2][3]

Petition drives[edit]

The following ballot measures appeared on the ballot after the sponsoring campaign committee hired National Petition Management to collect signatures. Since 2016, 13 ballot measures appeared on the ballot after the sponsoring committee(s) hired National Petition Management to gather signatures. Of the 13 measures that appeared on the ballot, eight were approved and five were defeated. Sponsoring committees paid an average of $2,755,867.80 in total for National Petition Management's signature gathering services per ballot measure.

Measures on the ballot (2016-2021)[edit]

Year	Measure	Measure description	Total cost	Signatures required	CPRS	Outcome
2016	California Proposition 51	$9 billion in bonds for education and schools	$1,252,534.01	365,880	$3.42	a
2016	California Proposition 53	Projects that cost more than $2 billion	$2,669,093.95	585,407	$4.56	d
2016	California Proposition 54	Conditions under which legislative bills can be passed	$6,622,935.93	585,407	$11.31	a
2016	California Proposition 65	Grocery and retail carry-out bags	$2,137,992.45	365,880	$5.84	d
2016	California Proposition 66	Death penalty procedures	$3,065,943.08	365,880	$8.38	a
2016	California Proposition 67	Prohibition on plastic single-use carryout bags	$2,911,945.89	504,760	$5.77	a
2016	Missouri Amendment 3	Increase the tax on cigarettes by 60 cents	$546,785.27	157,788	$3.47	d
2018	California Proposition 4	Issues $1.5 billion in bonds for children's hospitals	$2,645,311.84	365,880	$7.23	a
2018	California Proposition 11	Allow ambulance providers to require workers to remain on call during breaks paid	$2,892,967.03	365,880	$7.91	a
2018	Michigan Proposition 1	Legalizes marijuana for recreational use	$783,535.66	252,523	$3.10	a
2018	Missouri Proposition C	Legalizes marijuana for medical purposes	$1,057,185.00	100,126	$10.56	d
2020	California Proposition 22	Considers app-based drivers to be independent contractors and enacts several labor policies related to app-based companies	$6,461,617.23	623,212	$10.37	a
2020	California Proposition 25	Replaces cash bail with risk assessments for suspects awaiting trial	$2,778,434.11	365,880	$7.59	d

This chart was last updated after statewide ballot measure elections in 2021.

Ballot initiative signature costs[edit]

See also: Laws governing the initiative process and Analysis of signature costs in past years

The cost of getting an initiative before voters varies widely by state and by initiative proposal. The requirements and restrictions imposed by state law form a major factor in the expense of an initiative signature petition effort.

Higher signature requirements are a straightforward example of a reason an initiative petition campaign might be more expensive in one state than in another. Other restrictions that can make a difference in the cost of a petition campaign include:

• Distribution requirements - It is easier and less expensive to collect a lot of signatures in one very populous area than a small number of signatures from lots of smaller, less-populated areas.
• Pay-per-signature bans - Paying signature gatherers by signature is one of the most cost-efficient ways to fund signature gathering efforts.
• Restrictions on circulators - Restricting who can collect signatures limits competition between petition companies and professional signature gatherers.
• Initiative petition circulation periods - If proponents have less time to collect signatures, the process can be more expensive.

Measuring the cost[edit]

See also: Analysis of signature costs in past years

Ballotpedia uses two ways to measure the cost of an initiative or veto referendum petition drive.

1. According to the total cost of gathering the required signatures to put the initiative or veto referendum on the ballot
2. According to the total cost divided by the number of signatures required to qualify the measure for the ballot or Cost Per Required Signature (CPRS)

Total cost: The total cost depends on all of the factors that can make a petition effort more or less expensive, including the population of the state and the state's signature requirements. This measurement does not necessarily indicate how difficult it is to run a signature petition campaign in a state relative to other states or how hard and expensive it is to collect a given valid signature. It takes into consideration the population and signature requirements for a state. For example, the average total cost of a successful initiative petition drive in California in 2016 was just over $2.9 million, while in Oklahoma the average total cost was about $870,000. Initiatives in California, however, require over four times as many signatures and affect 10 times as many people.

Cost Per Required Signature (CPRS): The cost per required signature cuts out the variable of a state's signature requirements and shows the cost for each signature needed to qualify the measure for the ballot. This second measurement is a better indication of how difficult it is to run a signature petition campaign in a given state relative to other states. For example, the average CPRS in California in 2016 was $6.20 while the average CPRS in Oklahoma was $9.59, but the average total petition cost was $2.9 million in California and about $870,000 in Oklahoma.

From the perspective of a national organization or proponents of a national agenda, this means that a lower CPRS generally means that a campaign could potentially affect more people and achieve more political influence per dollar spent, while the total petition cost might dictate in which states the campaign could actually afford to launch a successful petition drive.

Recent news[edit]

The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms National Petition Management. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.

See also[edit]

• Ballot initiative
• Ballot measures cost per required signatures analysis
• Petition drive management companies
• Laws governing the initiative process
• Signature requirements for ballot measures
• Initiative petition signature validity rates
• Initiative petition circulation periods

External links[edit]

• National Petition Management website

Footnotes[edit]

v • e Statewide ballot measures State A • Alabama • Alaska • Arizona • Arkansas • C • California • Colorado • Connecticut • F • Florida • G • Georgia • H • Hawaii • I • Idaho • Illinois • Indiana • Iowa • K • Kansas • Kentucky • L • Louisiana • M • Maine • Maryland • Massachusetts • Michigan • Minnesota • Mississippi • Missouri • Montana • N • Nebraska • Nevada • New Hampshire • New Jersey • New Mexico • New York • North Carolina • North Dakota • O • Ohio • Oklahoma • Oregon • P • Pennsylvania • R • Rhode Island • S • South Carolina • South Dakota • T • Tennessee • Texas • U • Utah • V • Vermont • Virginia • W • Washington • West Virginia • Wisconsin • Wyoming By topic A • Abortion • Admin of gov't • Affirmative action • Alcohol • Animal rights • Assisted death • B • Bonds • Budgets • Business regulation • C • Campaigns • Civil rights • Constitutional conventions • Constitutional language • County government • D • Daylight Saving Time • Death penalty • Direct democracy • E • Earthquakes • Education • Elections • Eminent domain • English • Environment • Executives • F • Federal constitutional issues • Firearms • G • Gambling • Government accountability • H • Healthcare • Housing • Hunting • I • Immigration • Insurance • J • State judiciary • L • LGBT • Labor • Law enforcement • Legislatures • M • Marijuana • Marriage • Minimum wage • Mottos • Municipal government • N • Natural resources • P • Pensions • Property • Public finance • R • Recall • Redistricting • Race and ethnicity • Religion • Rules about Sunday • S • Salaries of elected officials • Smoking bans • State budgets • State executives • State judiciary • State legislatures • Stem cells • Supermajority requirements • Sundays • T • Taxes • Tobacco • Transportation • U • Unions • Utilities • V • Veterans • W • Wages • War and peace • Water • Welfare By type Advisory vote • Automatic referral • Bond measure • Commission referral • Constitutional amendment (by initiative) • Constitutional amendment (referred by legislature) • Grand Jury Panels • State statute (by initiative) • State statute (referred by legislature) • Veto referendum Forms of direct democracy in the American states By year 2026 • 2025 • 2024 • 2023 • 2022 • 2021 • 2020 • 2019 • 2018 • 2017 • 2016 • 2015 • 2014 • 2013 • 2012 • 2011 • 2010 • 2009 • 2008 • 2007 • 2006 • 2005 • 2004 • 2003 • 2002 • 2001 • 2000 • 1999 • 1998 • 1997 • 1996 • 1995 • 1994 • 1993 • 1992 • 1991 • 1990 • 1989 • 1988 • 1987 • 1986 • 1985 • 1984 • 1983 • 1982 • 1981 • 1980 • 1979 • 1978 • 1977 • 1976 • 1975 • 1974 • 1973 • 1972 • 1971 • 1970 • 1969 • 1968 • 1967 • 1966 • 1965 • 1964 • 1963 • 1962 • 1961 • 1960 • 1959 • 1958 • 1957 • 1956 • 1955 • 1954 • 1953 • 1952 • 1951 • 1950 • 1949 • 1948 • 1947 • 1946 • 1945 • 1944 • 1943 • 1942 • 1941 • 1940 • 1939 • 1938 • 1937 • 1936 • 1935 • 1934 • 1933 • 1932 • 1931 • 1930 • 1929 • 1928 • 1927 • 1926 • 1925 • 1924 • 1923 • 1922 • 1921 • 1920 • 1919 • 1918 • 1917 • 1916 • 1915 • 1914 • 1913 • 1912 • 1911 • 1910 • 1909 • 1908 • 1907 • 1906 • 1905 • 1904 • 1903 • 1902 • 1901 • 1900 Other State Ballot Measure Monthly reports • Features of official voter guides • Ballot measures cost per required signatures analysis • 2025 ballot measure campaign finance • 2025 ballot language readability analysis

	v • e Signature requirements
Signature requirements	Alabama • Alaska • Arizona • Arkansas • California • Colorado • Connecticut • Delaware • Florida • Georgia • Hawaii • Idaho • Illinois • Indiana • Iowa • Kansas • Kentucky • Louisiana • Maine • Maryland • Massachusetts • Michigan • Minnesota • Mississippi • Missouri • Montana • Nebraska • Nevada • New Hampshire • New Jersey • New Mexico • New York • North Carolina • North Dakota • Ohio • Oklahoma • Oregon • Pennsylvania • Rhode Island • South Carolina • South Dakota • Tennessee • Texas • Utah • Vermont • Virginia • Washington • West Virginia • Wisconsin • Wyoming
Petition companies	American Petition Consultants • Arno Political Consultants • Bader & Associates, Inc. • Canvasser Services • Capitol Assets • Democracy Direct • Democracy Resources • Discovery Petition Management • FieldWorks • JSM, Inc. • Kimball Petition Management • LAMM Political Partners, LLC • Masterson & Wright • National Ballot Access • National Petition Management • National Solutions • National Voter Outreach • PCI Consultants, Inc.
Terms	Approved for circulation • Initiative petition circulation periods • Circulator • Circulator affidavit • Forged signature • Fraudulent signature • Invalid signature • Paid circulator • Petition • Random sampling • Registered voter • Signature certification • Signer • Signer intent • Valid signature • Volunteer circulator • Signature transcription
Petition drive deadlines	2008 deadlines • 2009 deadlines • 2010 deadlines • 2011 deadlines • 2012 deadlines • 2013 deadlines • 2014 deadlines • 2015 deadlines • 2016 deadlines • 2017 deadlines • 2018 deadlines • 2019 deadlines • 2020 deadlines • 2021 deadlines • 2022 deadlines • 2023 deadlines • 2024 deadlines • 2025 deadlines
Signature law	States where signature requirements are based on votes cast for governor