Applying classical methods of machine learning to the study of quantum systems is the focus of an emergent area of physics research. A basic example of this is quantum state tomography, where a quantum state is learned from measurement.[1] Other examples include learning Hamiltonians,[2][3] learning quantum phase transitions,[4][5] and automatically generating new quantum experiments.[6][7][8][9] Classical machine learning is effective at processing large amounts of experimental or calculated data in order to characterize an unknown quantum system, making its application useful in contexts including quantum information theory, quantum technologies development, and computational materials design. In this context, it can be used for example as a tool to interpolate pre-calculated interatomic potentials[10] or directly solving the Schrödinger equation with a variational method.[11]
Contents
1Applications of machine learning to physics
1.1Noisy data
1.2Calculated and noise-free data
1.3Variational circuits
1.4Sign problem
1.5Fluid dynamics
1.6Physics discovery and prediction
2See also
3References
Applications of machine learning to physics
Noisy data
The ability to experimentally control and prepare increasingly complex quantum systems brings with it a growing need to turn large and noisy data sets into meaningful information. This is a problem that has already been studied extensively in the classical setting, and consequently, many existing machine learning techniques can be naturally adapted to more efficiently address experimentally relevant problems. For example, Bayesian methods and concepts of algorithmic learning can be fruitfully applied to tackle quantum state classification,[12] Hamiltonian learning,[13] and the characterization of an unknown unitary transformation.[14][15] Other problems that have been addressed with this approach are given in the following list:
Identifying an accurate model for the dynamics of a quantum system, through the reconstruction of the Hamiltonian;[16][17][18]
Extracting information on unknown states;[19][20][21][12][22][1]
Learning unknown unitary transformations and measurements;[14][15]
Engineering of quantum gates from qubit networks with pairwise interactions, using time dependent[23] or independent[24] Hamiltonians.
Improving the extraction accuracy of physical observables from absorption images of ultracold atoms (degenerate Fermi gas), by the generation of an ideal reference frame.[25]
Calculated and noise-free data
Quantum machine learning can also be applied to dramatically accelerate the prediction of quantum properties of molecules and materials.[26] This can be helpful for the computational design of new molecules or materials. Some examples include
Interpolating interatomic potentials;[27]
Inferring molecular atomization energies throughout chemical compound space;[28]
Accurate potential energy surfaces with restricted Boltzmann machines;[29]
Automatic generation of new quantum experiments;[6][7]
Solving the many-body, static and time-dependent Schrödinger equation;[11]
Identifying phase transitions from entanglement spectra;[30]
Generating adaptive feedback schemes for quantum metrology and quantum tomography.[31][32]
Variational circuits
Variational circuits are a family of algorithms which utilize training based on circuit parameters and an objective function.[33] Variational circuits are generally composed of a classical device communicating input parameters (random or pre-trained parameters) into a quantum device, along with a classical Mathematical optimization function. These circuits are very heavily dependent on the architecture of the proposed quantum device because parameter adjustments are adjusted based solely on the classical components within the device.[34] Though the application is considerably infantile in the field of quantum machine learning, it has incredibly high promise for more efficiently generating efficient optimization functions.
Sign problem
Machine learning techniques can be used to find a better manifold of integration for path integrals in order to avoid the sign problem.[35]
Fluid dynamics
This section is an excerpt from Deep learning § Partial differential equations[ edit ]
Physics informed neural networks have been used to solve partial differential equations in both forward and inverse problems in a data driven manner.[36] One example is the reconstructing fluid flow governed by the Navier-Stokes equations. Using physics informed neural networks does not require the often expensive mesh generation that conventional CFD methods relies on.[37][38]
Physics discovery and prediction
Illustration of how an AI learns the basic fundamental physical concept of 'unchangeableness'[39]
A deep learning system was reported to learn intuitive physics from visual data (of virtual 3D environments) based on an unpublished approach inspired by studies of visual cognition in infants.[40][39] Other researchers have developed a machine learning algorithm that could discover sets of basic variables of various physical systems and predict the systems' future dynamics from video recordings of their behavior.[41][42] In the future, it may be possible that such can be used to automate the discovery of physical laws of complex systems.[41] Beyond discovery and prediction, "blank slate"-type of learning of fundamental aspects of the physical world may have further applications such as improving adaptive and broad artificial general intelligence.[additional citation(s) needed] In specific, prior machine learning models were "highly specialised and lack a general understanding of the world".[40]
See also
Quantum computing
Quantum machine learning
Quantum algorithm for linear systems of equations
Quantum annealing
Quantum neural network
References
↑ 1.01.1Torlai, Giacomo; Mazzola, Guglielmo; Carrasquilla, Juan; Troyer, Matthias; Melko, Roger; Carleo, Giuseppe (May 2018). "Neural-network quantum state tomography" (in en). Nature Physics14 (5): 447–450. doi:10.1038/s41567-018-0048-5. ISSN 1745-2481. Bibcode: 2018NatPh..14..447T.
↑Cory, D. G.; Wiebe, Nathan; Ferrie, Christopher; Granade, Christopher E. (2012-07-06). "Robust Online Hamiltonian Learning" (in en). New Journal of Physics14 (10): 103013. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/14/10/103013. Bibcode: 2012NJPh...14j3013G.
↑Cao, Chenfeng; Hou, Shi-Yao; Cao, Ningping; Zeng, Bei (2020-02-10). "Supervised learning in Hamiltonian reconstruction from local measurements on eigenstates" (in en). Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter33 (6): 064002. doi:10.1088/1361-648x/abc4cf. ISSN 0953-8984. PMID 33105109. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/abc4cf.
↑Broecker, Peter; Assaad, Fakher F.; Trebst, Simon (2017-07-03). "Quantum phase recognition via unsupervised machine learning". arXiv:1707.00663 [cond-mat.str-el].
↑ 6.06.1Krenn, Mario (2016-01-01). "Automated Search for new Quantum Experiments". Physical Review Letters116 (9): 090405. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.090405. PMID 26991161. Bibcode: 2016PhRvL.116i0405K.
↑ 7.07.1Knott, Paul (2016-03-22). "A search algorithm for quantum state engineering and metrology". New Journal of Physics18 (7): 073033. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/18/7/073033. Bibcode: 2016NJPh...18g3033K.
↑Dunjko, Vedran; Briegel, Hans J (2018-06-19). "Machine learning & artificial intelligence in the quantum domain: a review of recent progress". Reports on Progress in Physics81 (7): 074001. doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aab406. ISSN 0034-4885. PMID 29504942. Bibcode: 2018RPPh...81g4001D.
↑Melnikov, Alexey A.; Nautrup, Hendrik Poulsen; Krenn, Mario; Dunjko, Vedran; Tiersch, Markus; Zeilinger, Anton; Briegel, Hans J. (1221). "Active learning machine learns to create new quantum experiments" (in en). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences115 (6): 1221–1226. doi:10.1073/pnas.1714936115. ISSN 0027-8424. PMID 29348200.
↑Raissi, M.; Perdikaris, P.; Karniadakis, G. E. (2019-02-01). "Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations" (in en). Journal of Computational Physics378: 686–707. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045. ISSN 0021-9991. Bibcode: 2019JCoPh.378..686R. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999118307125.
↑Mao, Zhiping; Jagtap, Ameya D.; Karniadakis, George Em (2020-03-01). "Physics-informed neural networks for high-speed flows" (in en). Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering360: 112789. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2019.112789. ISSN 0045-7825. Bibcode: 2020CMAME.360k2789M. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045782519306814.
↑Raissi, Maziar; Yazdani, Alireza; Karniadakis, George Em (2020-02-28). "Hidden fluid mechanics: Learning velocity and pressure fields from flow visualizations". Science367 (6481): 1026–1030. doi:10.1126/science.aaw4741. PMID 32001523. Bibcode: 2020Sci...367.1026R.
↑ 39.039.1Piloto, Luis S.; Weinstein, Ari; Battaglia, Peter; Botvinick, Matthew (11 July 2022). "Intuitive physics learning in a deep-learning model inspired by developmental psychology" (in en). Nature Human Behaviour6 (9): 1257–1267. doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01394-8. ISSN 2397-3374. PMID 35817932.
↑ 40.040.1"DeepMind AI learns physics by watching videos that don't make sense". New Scientist. https://www.newscientist.com/article/2327766-deepmind-ai-learns-physics-by-watching-videos-that-dont-make-sense.
↑ 41.041.1Feldman, Andrey (11 August 2022). "Artificial physicist to unravel the laws of nature". Advanced Science News. https://www.advancedsciencenews.com/an-artificial-physicist-to-unravel-the-laws-of-nature/.
↑Chen, Boyuan; Huang, Kuang; Raghupathi, Sunand; Chandratreya, Ishaan; Du, Qiang; Lipson, Hod (July 2022). "Automated discovery of fundamental variables hidden in experimental data" (in en). Nature Computational Science2 (7): 433–442. doi:10.1038/s43588-022-00281-6. ISSN 2662-8457.