From Jewish Encyclopedia (1906) Festive meals on occasions of the celebration of domestic, communal, and religious joy, and on welcoming as well as on parting from friends. Social in character, they originated, as is now generally assumed, in sacrificial feasts.
As W. Robertson Smith tersely puts it: "A sacrifice was a public ceremony of a township; the law of the feast was open-handed hospitality; no sacrifice was complete without guests, and portions were freely distributed to rich and poor within the circle of a man's acquaintance; universal hilarity prevailed" ("Religion of the Semites," 1889, pp. 236-258, with special reference to I Sam. ix. 13, xx. 6; II Sam. vi. 19; Neh. viii. 10). Participation in sacrificial meals was equivalent to covenanting with the Deity; hence the prohibition not "to eat of the sacrifice" of the heathen (Ex. xxxiv. 15; Smith, l.c. pp. 252-300; Trumbull, "The Blood Covenant," 1885, pp. 268 et seq. ).
In Biblical Times.In Biblical times the religious nature of these meals predominated, whether in the harvest feast (Deut. xvi. 10, 14; xii. 7, 12, 18; Judges ix. 27), or in the covenant feasts at the union or parting of friends (Gen. xxvi. 30, xxxi. 54; Ex. xxiv. 5), to which category belongs also the weddingfeast (Gen. xxiv. 54, xxix. 22; Judges xiv. 10) or the thanksgiving feasts (Job i. 4; Ps. xxii. 26, 27; Esth. viii. 17, ix. 22) or the feast of sheep-shearing (I Sam. xxv. 36; II Sam. xiii. 23), and probably also the feast of house dedication, according to Prov. ix. 1-4. The weaning of a child, usually after its second year, was an occasion of feasting (Gen. xxi. 8; see Knobel-Dillmann on the passage). Birthday feasts are mentioned, but only of non-Jewish kings (Gen. xl. 20; II Macc. vi. 7; that of Herod, in Matt. xiv. 6, may have been on the day of his accession to the throne, as seems to be the case with Esth. i. 3, 4, and Dan. v. 1). The sacrificial feasts, however, in the course of time, to the chagrin of the Prophets, had become carousals void of all religious spirit. "The harp and the viol, the taboret and pipe, and wine are in their feasts; but they regard not the work of the Lord, neither consider the operation of his hands" (Isa. v. 11, 12; compare xxviii. 7, 8, and Amos vi. 5, 6).
In Post-Biblical Times.The Talmud discriminates between religious Banquets ("se'udah shel miẓwah"), in which the student of the Law should participate, and Banquets of a non-religious, voluntary character ("se'udah shel reshut"), in which the student of the Law should not participate (Pes. 49 a ). In the former are included:
in Gen. xxi. 8, "Abraham made a great feast the same day that Isaac was weaned," as a Notarikon,
, "on the eighth day when he circumcised Isaac" (Pirḳe R. El. xxix.; Midr. Teh. to Ps. cxii.; Leḳaḥ Ṭob to Gen.; Shab. 130a, Tos.). Josephus does not seem to know of the custom as yet, for he writes ("Contra Ap." ii. 26): "The law does not permit us to make festivals at the births of our children and thereby afford occasion for drinking to excess." This is an allusion to the Greek festival called "Onomathesia" (giving of name), and "Hebdomeneumenia" (feast of the week) (Hermann, "Lehrbuch der Gottesdienstlichen Alterthümer der Griechen," § 26, note 6), which occurs as "shabua' ha-Ben" in the Hadrianic time in the Talmud (Yer. Ket. i. 25c; B. B. 60b; Sanh. 32b), but has been identified with the circumcision feast (Löw, "Die Lebensalter," p. 89; Spitzer, "Das Mahl bei den Hebräern," p. 41, note 4).
; Solomon ben Adret, Responsa, Nos. 200 and 758; Shulḥan 'Aruk, Yoreh De'ah, 305, 10). The feast given on the night before circumcision, called the "Zakor"-meal, and the one given at the naming of the new-born daughter on the fourth Sabbath, called "Hollekreisch," are of late and foreign origin. They are not mentioned in the older codes, but Israel Isserlein refers to them in "Terumat ha-Deshen," p. 269, as does Mordecai Japhe in "Lebush," Yoreh De'ah, 265, 12.
The various rules regarding the invitation and the seating of the guests, the mixing of the wine and the serving of the dishes, to be observed by the master of the banquet, called in Greek "ἀρχιτρίκλινος," by the cook, and the servant of the house ("shammash"), were no less strictly observed by the Jews than by the Greeks and Romans, as may be learned from Ber. vii.; Tosef., Ber. iv.-vii.; Derek 'Ereẓ Rabba and Zuṭṭa. For the Babylonian Jews, the Persians were guides and patterns (Ber. 61 b ). The wealthy Jews often followed the example of the Romans in indulging in sumptuous and boisterous Banquets such as are described in Philo, "De Vita Contemplativa," §§ 5-7, and Wisdom ii. 7 et seq. All the more do the Rabbis warn against luxurious meals (Pes. 49 a ), and insist that discussions of Scripture, sacred songs, and, above all, the presence of students of the Law should give each banquet a sacred character (Ab. iii. 3). "All tables are full of vomit and filthiness without Maḳom" (= the name of God) (Isa. xxviii. 8; see Taylor, "Sayings of the Jewish Fathers," who refers to Cor. x. 31; Ber. 64 a ; Sanh. 101 a ; compare Ber. 43 b ).
Portions from the Banquets were sent to the poor, "to them for whom nothing is prepared" (Neh. viii. 10), especially on Purim (Esth. ix. 19, 22). Greater than the Banquets given by King Solomon (B. M. vii. 1) were, according to B. M. 86 b , those of Abraham, because his hospitality was the greater. Nehemiah also kept open house (Neh. v. 17, 18). The Ḥasidic Banquets described by Philo ( l.c. §§ 8 et seq. ) and Josephus ("B. J." ii. 8, § 5) gave rise to the idea of a great banquet of the righteous in the world to come, also called "se'udah" (Ab. iii. 25; compare Taylor, l.c. ; Rev. xix. 9, "Se'udah shel Liviatan"; see Leviathan and Eschatology ).
Categories: [Jewish encyclopedia 1906]
ZWI signed: