Part of the silent majority
Cogito ergo sum Logic and rhetoric
|
|
| Key articles
|
- Logical fallacy
- Syllogism
- Argument
|
| General logic
|
- Münchhausen Trilemma
- Fallacy of amphiboly
- Appeal to gravity
- On the spot fallacy
- Broken window fallacy
- Apelación a la piedad
|
| Bad logic
|
- Cherry picking
- Ham Hightail
- Four-term fallacy
- Affirming a disjunct
- Fallacy of opposition
- Post hoc, ergo propter hoc (português)
v - t - e
|
“”"That's how they win... by making you think you're alone."
|
| —Star Wars: The rise of Skywalker
|
First invoked in politics by Richard Nixon,[1] the Silent Majority is a hypothetical mass of citizens that approve of the speaker's position, but have not publicly expressed this in any tangible way. It is the off-line equivalent of "The lurkers support me in email."
It is also the name of a song by the band True Sounds of Liberty (TSOL).[2]
Use by conservative wingnuts[edit]
The "silent majority" is most often invoked by conservative politicians who argue that real Americans are conservative, but neither as politically active nor as loud as their liberal counterparts. Nixon initially employed it in reference to the Vietnam War: since most Americans weren't actively protesting the war, Nixon's reasoning went, it followed that they supported his policies. In contrast, those criticizing the war were a "vocal minority" whose views received disproportionate attention.
This logic is, to say the least, highly flawed, since it assumes facts not in evidence. By definition, the opinions of a "silent majority" are difficult to gauge since they do not engage in politicking outside of an election year. Assuming that all supporters of a position are silent, and all those who oppose it are vocal, is extremely dubious reasoning. Nixon's own domestic advisor, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, cautioned him that "the silent majority is silent because it has nothing to say."[3]
With the rise of right-wing media and activist groups over the past few decades, the term has become even more of an oxymoron, which hasn't stopped Republicans from using it. Most recently, Donald Trump and his supporters have branded themselves a silent majority,[4] even though most of them are about as silent as an airhorn operated by a drunk frat boy and Trump has never had a majority of support of Americans.
Ironically, the phrase was originally a euphemism for dead people, as in "He joined the silent majority".[5] So when a politician says the silent majority will support them on election day…
The Horseshoe lands in China[edit]
Interestingly, the Chinese government and the tankies used this fallacious argument as a propaganda tool during the 2019–2020 Hong Kong protests
, trying to make it look like the majority of Hong Kong residents supported China and opposed the protests, but supposedly were unable to do so due to fear of retribution from protesters.[6][7] During the 2019 Hong Kong local elections,
however, the pro-democracy parties won in an absolute fucking landslide. Now, the CCP has to either resort to Doublethink or whine about "muh violence" or that the Hongkongers are "brainwashed" by British colonialism.[8]
See also[edit]
- Burden of proof
- Argumentum ad populum
- Appeal to authority
References[edit]
- ↑ http://www.history.com/topics/us-presidents/richard-m-nixon/videos/nixon-addresses-silent-majority
- ↑ TSOL - Abolish Government \ Silent Majority YouTube.
- ↑ https://www.nixonlibrary.gov/virtuallibrary/releases/jun09/111370_Moynihan.pdf
- ↑ http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/12/us/politics/donald-trump-defiantly-rallies-a-new-silent-majority-in-a-visit-to-arizona.html
- ↑ https://books.google.com/books?id=EcZZAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA302&hl=en#v=onepage&q&f=false Greenough, James Bradstreet; George Lyman Kittredge (1920)
- ↑ https://www.newstatesman.com/world/asia/2019/11/day-hong-kong-s-true-silent-majority-spoke
- ↑ https://hongkongfp.com/2019/07/16/extremist-mobs-chinas-propaganda-machine-tries-control-message-hong-kong-protests/
- ↑ https://www.scmp.com/comment/letters/article/3039475/how-could-most-hong-kong-vote-support-rioting-and-violence
| Articles about logical fallacies
|
| Informal fallacies:
|
Appeal to tradition • Appeal to novelty • Appeal to nature • Argument from morality • Argumentum ad martyrdom • Big words • Certum est quia impossibile est • Morton's fork • Friend argument • Exception that proves the rule • Extended analogy • Hindsight bias • Race card • Moralistic fallacy • Release the data • Gish Gallop • Terrorism-baiting • Uncertainty tactic • Greece-baiting • Ham Hightail • Red-baiting • Gore's Law • Nazi analogies • Mistaking the map for the territory • Red herring • Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur • Presentism • Sunk cost • Two wrongs make a right • Flying carpet fallacy • My enemy's enemy • Appeal to ancient wisdom • Danth's Law • Argumentum ad lunam • Balance fallacy • Golden hammer • Loaded question • Escape to the future • Word magic • Spider-Man fallacy • Sanctioning the devil • Appeal to mystery • Informal fallacy • Common sense • Post-designation • Hyperbole • Relativist fallacy • Due diligence • Straw man • Good old days • Appeal to probability • Infinite regress • Circular reasoning • Media was wrong before • Is–ought problem • Ad iram • Just asking questions • Pink-baiting • Appeal to faith • Appeal to fear • Appeal to bias • Appeal to confidence • Appeal to consequences • Appeal to emotion • Appeal to flattery • Appeal to gravity • Appeal to hate • Argument from omniscience • Argument from silence • Argumentum ad baculum • Argumentum ad fastidium • Association fallacy • Broken window fallacy • Category mistake • Confounding factor • Counterfactual fallacy • Courtier's Reply • Damning with faint praise • Definitional fallacies • Equivocation • Fallacy of accent • Fallacy of accident • Fallacy of amphiboly • Gambler's fallacy • Imprecision fallacy • Moving the goalposts • Nirvana fallacy • Overprecision • Pathos gambit • Pragmatic fallacy • Quote mining • Argumentum ad sarcina inserta • Science doesn't know everything • Slothful induction • Spotlight fallacy • Style over substance • Toupee fallacy • Genuine but insignificant cause • Argument from incredulity • Appeal to age • Argumentum ad nauseam • Phantom distinction • Appeal to common sense • Argumentum ad hysteria • Omnipotence paradox • Argument from etymology • Appeal to trauma • Countless counterfeits fallacy •
|
|
|
Ad hoc:
|
No True Scotsman • Moving the goalposts • Escape hatch • Handwave • Special pleading • Slothful induction • Nirvana fallacy • God of the gaps • PIDOOMA • Ad hoc • Tone argument •
|
|
|
Arguments from ignorance:
|
Science doesn't know everything • Argument from incredulity • Argument from silence • Toupee fallacy • Appeal to censorship • Science was wrong before • Holmesian fallacy • Argument from omniscience • Willful ignorance • Argument from ignorance •
|
|
|
Causation fallacies:
|
Post hoc, ergo propter hoc • Correlation does not imply causation • Wrong direction • Counterfactual fallacy • Regression fallacy • Gambler's fallacy • Denying the antecedent • Genuine but insignificant cause •
|
|
|
Circular reasoning:
|
Infinite regress • Argument by assertion • Argumentum ad dictionarium • Appeal to faith • Circular reasoning • Self-refuting idea •
|
|
|
Emotional appeals:
|
Appeal to fear • Appeal to emotion • Appeal to confidence • Deepity • Argumentum ad baculum • Appeal to shame • Appeal to flattery • Tone argument • Appeal to money • Argumentum ad fastidium • Appeal to gravity • Appeal to consequences • Loaded language • Style over substance • Appeal to pity • Appeal to hate • Pathos gambit • Shaming • Degenerate • Abomination •
|
|
|
Fallacies of ambiguity:
|
Fallacy of accent • Equivocation • Fallacy of amphiboly • Quote mining • Fallacy of ambiguity • Moral equivalence • Scope fallacy • Suppressed correlative • Not as bad as • Etymology • Continuum fallacy • Wronger than wrong • Definitional fallacies • Code word • Phantom distinction •
|
| Formal fallacies:
|
Confusion of the inverse • Denying the antecedent • Non sequitur • Affirmative conclusion from a negative premise • Not even wrong • Chewbacca Defense • Affirming a disjunct • Illicit process • Four-term fallacy • Negative conclusion from affirmative premises • Fallacy fallacy • Substituting explanation for premise • Enthymeme • Syllogism • Formal fallacy • Existential assumption • Masked man fallacy • Self-refuting idea • Argument by gibberish • One single proof • Affirming the consequent • False dilemma • Conjunction fallacy •
|
| Fallacious arguments:
|
Bumblebee argument • Fatwa envy • Gotcha argument • Hoyle's fallacy • Intuition pump • Logic and Creation • Not Circular Reasoning • Peanut butter argument • Great Beethoven fallacy • Fallacy of unique founding conditions • Evil is the absence of God • Argument from first cause • How do you know? Were you there? • Argument from design • Argument from beauty • Appeal to nature • Solferino fallacy • Religious scientists • Nothing to hide • Argument from fine tuning • Creep shaming • "I used to be an atheist" • Atheism as a religion • Argumentum ad populum • Argument from morality • Anti-environmentalism • Appeal to bias • Apophasis • Argumentum ad nauseam • Appeal to censorship • Argumentum ad sarcina inserta • Blaming the victim • Bait-and-switch • Danth's Law • Chewbacca Defense • Canard • DARVO • Demonization • Escape hatch • Friend argument • Everyone is racist • Gish Gallop • Greece-baiting • Gore's Law • Ham Hightail • Just asking questions • Leading question • Loaded language • Linking to authority • Loaded question • Lying by omission • Motte and bailey • Nazi analogies • Moving the goalposts • One single proof • Pink-baiting • One-way hash argument • Pathos gambit • Quote mining • Poisoning the well • Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur • Race card • Red-baiting • Red herring • Release the data • Science was wrong before • Shill gambit • Straw man • Uncertainty tactic • Style over substance • Terrorism-baiting • Weasel word • What's the harm (logical fallacy) • Whataboutism • Bullshit • Logical fallacy • Banana argument • Scapegoat • How come there are still monkeys? • Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white • Ontological argument • Omnipotence paradox • Presuppositionalism • Just a joke • Countless counterfeits fallacy •
|
| Conditional fallacies:
|
Slippery slope • What's the harm (logical fallacy) • Special pleading • Conditional fallacy • On the spot fallacy • Appeal to the minority • Argumentum ad populum • Galileo gambit • Professor of nothing •
|
|
|
Genetic fallacies:
|
Genetic fallacy •
|
|
|
|
Appeals to authority:
|
Ipse dixit • Appeal to confidence • Argumentum ad populum • Argument from authority • Linking to authority • Invincible authority • Appeal to celebrity • Ultracrepidarianism • Appeal to the minority • Galileo gambit • Appeal to identity • Weasel word • Professor of nothing • Euthyphro dilemma • Divine command theory •
|
|
|
|
Ad hominem:
|
Ad iram • Argumentum ad cellarium • Bulverism • Poisoning the well • Blaming the victim • Tu quoque • Whataboutism • Nutpicking • Jonanism • Demonization • Shill gambit • Appeal to bias • Fallacy of opposition • Association fallacy • Damning with faint praise • Pathos gambit • Appeal to identity • Argumentum ad hominem • Nazi analogies • Not an argument • Nothing to hide • Scapegoat • 地下室论证 •
|
|
|
Imprecision fallacies:
|
Apex fallacy • Overprecision • Cherry picking • Overgeneralization • Texas sharpshooter fallacy • False analogy • Appeal to fiction • Spotlight fallacy • Pragmatic fallacy • Selection bias • Anecdotal evidence • Category mistake • Nutpicking • Imprecision fallacy • Confounding factor • Fallacy of accident • Neyman's bias •
|
| Valid logical methods:
|
Rapoport's Rules • Negative evidence • Reductio ad absurdum •
|
| Fallacy collections:
|
SeekFind • Nizkor Project • Fallacy Files • Your Logical Fallacy Is • Logically Fallacious •
|