Sleep Deprivation

From Scholarpedia

Sleep deprivation is the restriction of sleep below the level of basal sleep need; this can be both acute (a single period of extended wakefulness), or chronic (the accumulation of sleep debt over multiple nights of sleep restriction). The basal sleep need of an organism is its habitual sleep duration in the absence of pre-existing sleep debt, with sleep debt defined as the duration of sleep below which waking deficits can be observed. In human beings, these deficits can be seen across a spectrum of neurocognitive domains from basic attentional processes to high-level executive function.

Under unrestricted sleep conditions, endogenous circadian and homeostatic processes interact to promote periods of stable sleep and wakefulness, with relatively abrupt transitions from one state to the other. Sleep deprivation leads to a breakdown in this stability, beginning with transient and involuntary intrusions of sleep into periods of wakefulness. These intrusions can be observed through a number of neurobehavioral phenomena, including microsleeps, sleep attacks, slow eyelid closures, voluntary naps, and slow rolling eye movements.

Apart from these directly-observable phenomena, the effects of sleep deprivation on human beings fall into two main categories: objective (which can be physiological or cognitive), and subjective.

Contents

[edit] Objective effects

[edit] Physiological

[edit] Cognitive

[edit] Subjective effects

Sleep deprivation is also widely believed to be associated with impaired emotional functioning. Field studies of sleep deprivation in medical personnel (Asken and Raham, 1983; Orton and Gruzeller, 1989) have found that reduced sleep is associated with increased negative and decreased positive emotional responses to specific events, but the uncontrolled nature of these studies allows for alternative interpretations of these results. Other than simple subjective self-report measures of affect, there are few laboratory-based studies on affective reactions in sleep-deprived humans.

[edit] Mathematical modeling

Interest in understanding the patterns of sleep intrusions and the other detrimental effects of sleep deprivation have led to the use and modification of existing biomathematical models of sleep-wake regulation. In particular, the two-process model of sleep regulation, first proposed by Alexander Borbély (1982), is the leading paradigm used to predict the effects of sleep and sleep deprivation on human cognition and performance. This model consists of a circadian oscillator with a period of slightly over 24 hours, as well as a homeostatic process (reflecting sleep pressure) that builds exponentially during periods of wakefulness and dissipates exponentially during periods of sleep (Figure 1). These two processes interact to promote alertness in the day and sleep during the night. It has been suggested that waking cognitive function can be mathematically modeled as the difference between the quantitative states of the circadian and homeostatic processes (Mallis, 2004).

Figure 1: The two process model of Borbely et al. (1982). Sleep drive is derived from an interaction of homeostatic sleep pressure (process S) and circadian oscillation (process C), leading to alternating periods of wake (white areas) and sleep (shaded areas). When subjects are sleep deprived (2nd 24-hour period), additional sleep pressure builds, leading to greater slow wave activity (SWA) and total sleep (TST) time on the subsequent night of recovery sleep.

Numerous refinements have since been proposed to improve the predictive validity of the two-process model. Adjustments have been made for environmental variables (such as light levels, and location), sleep variables (such as length and quality), and the level of cognitive workload during waking periods. In particular, including sleep inertia as an input factor improves the predictive power of the two-process model significantly. Seven leading biomathematical models of human fatigue and performance have emerged from modifications to the two-process model; these are reviewed and discussed by Mallis et al. (2004) and Dinges (2004).

[edit] Lapse and wake-state instability hypotheses

Early attempts to understand the effects of sleep deprivation focused on the “lapse hypothesis” (Dinges and Kribbs, 1991). This theory suggested that baseline levels of functioning are identical in rested and sleep-deprived states, but that sleep-deprived individuals experience transient phases of low arousal during which sleep intrusions and performance lapses occur. Although the hypothesis has some measure of explanatory power, evidence from experiments of chronic sleep restriction (Dinges et al., 1997) suggests that it is insufficient to account for the changes in neurobehavioral functioning that occur over time. For example, the increasing variability of reaction times on the Psychomotor Vigilance Test as the number of hours of sleep loss increases would not be predicted by the lapse hypothesis alone.

An alternative hypothesis is the “wake-state instability” theory, which posits that waking-state function degrades after sleep deprivation both because of lapses in attention and a decrease in tonic aspects of functioning. These global deficits in cognitive functioning account for the increased variability in performance, as well as the observed slowing of fastest or optimal responses.

[edit] Biological basis

For a more complete review of the VLPO and its function as a sleep switch, see Saper et al. (2005).

[edit] Individual differences in response

Comparisons of inter- and intra-individual variability in vulnerability to sleep deprivation have demonstrated that the former are substantially larger than the latter. Van Dongen et al. (2004) measured the intra-class coefficients (ICC) of subjective sleepiness and cognitive performance of participants undergoing three 36-hour periods of sleep deprivation. ICCs were high, with between-subject variance an order of magnitude greater than within-subject variance. These findings indicate that behavioral response to sleep deprivation is trait-like and stable over time. Leproult et al. (2003) also found that subjective and objective (EEG) measures of vulnerability to sleep deprivation were consistent when measured during separate experimental sessions.

[edit] Causes and costs

Lack of sleep, both chronic and acute, is a prevalent problem in modern society. For example, of 1.1 million Americans surveyed, as many as 20% indicated that they sleep 6.5 hours or less each night. In its extreme form, pathological levels of sleep deprivation are classified by the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) as insufficient sleep syndrome (ICD #307.49-4). Sleep deprivation can result from physiological deficits (e.g. obstructive sleep apnea), psychological problems (e.g. secondary insomnia), or simply reflect a lifestyle choice. Regardless of the source, it remains an under-treated symptom compared to its dramatic and often overlooked costs. For example, the cost of accidents involving sleep-deprived operators has been estimated at $43-56 billion, with almost 20% of serious motor-vehicles crashes occurring because of drowsy drivers. Sleep deprivation has also been implicated with increased risk of on-the-job errors, personal conflicts, health complaints, poorer academic performance in adolescents and increased drug use, to name just a few of its multitudinous consequences. (IOM, 2006).


[edit] References

Internal references


[edit] External links

[edit] See Also

Insomnia, Sleep, Sleep Apnea


Categories: [Sleep] [Neuroscience] [Multiple_Curators]


↧ Download as ZWI file | Last modified: 12/24/2021 09:48:37 | 3 views
☰ Source: http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Sleep_deprivation | License: CC BY-SA 3.0

ZWI signed:
  Encycloreader by the Knowledge Standards Foundation (KSF) ✓[what is this?]