From Conservapedia Trump third party referred to the possibility that Donald Trump would run as a third-party candidate in the 2016 presidential election.
The Fox News Channel opposes this and made it the first issue of the 2016 presidential debate. But in 1980, it was a third-party candidacy by fellow Republican John Anderson which helped elect the conservative Ronald Reagan. Also, the third-party candidacies of Ralph Nader and Pat Buchanan helped elect George W. Bush in 2000, and the third-party candidacy of George Wallace in 1968 helped elect Richard Nixon. Indeed, the last 60 years suggest that is more likely for a non-incumbent Republican to win the presidency when there is a third-party candidacy, than when there is not.
The example often cited by Republicans for a third-party candidate "spoiling" the chances of a Republican to win the presidency was Ross Perot's candidacy in 1992. But an analysis of the polling data and Republican George H.W. Bush's approval rating (an unelectable 33%) demonstrates that the Ross Perot candidacy did not spoil Bush's chances of winning, and actually helped narrow the gap between him and Clinton.[1] More people who had voted for Ross Perot in 1992 drifted to Clinton in 1996, rather than to the Republican Bob Dole, which reinforces the view that Ross Perot pulled at least as many voters away from Clinton in 1992 as from George H.W. Bush.
In 1996, Clinton won a slim majority of the overall votes, which tends to disprove the notion that Ross Perot was a spoiler in that race. The Republican nominee, Bob Dole, was a weak candidate from the moderate side of the party who had no chance of winning. Clinton's approval rating was well above 50%, which virtually guarantees an incumbent reelection.
In 2008 and 2012, in the absence of third-party candidacies, the liberal media were able to tee off against the Republican Party candidate in an unrelenting style. But when there is a significant third-party candidacy, as in 1968, 1980, and 2000, the media have a more difficult time being influential with its liberal bias.
The moderators and format for presidential debates tend to favor the Dems. As a result, Republicans tend to lose the presidential debates, with a few exceptions, dating back to 1960. In 1968 and 1972, Richard Nixon wisely refused to participate in the debates.
But with Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential debates, the dynamic is different and it may be more difficult for the liberal media to slant the debate in favor of the Dem candidate.
Historically, the swing states have been Florida, Ohio, Nevada, North Carolina, and Virginia.
Categories: [2016 Presidential Election] [2016 Presidential Debates] [Donald Trump]
ZWI signed: