In the Dictionary of Political Thought, Roger Scruton defines extremism as:
John George and Laird Wilcox, two of the foremost analysts of right and left-wing extremism, state that this definition reflects a common proposition about extremist behavior: it is more an “issue of style than of content.”[2] What the extremist believes is less important than what behavior he exhibits. Rather, extremism can cut across the political spectrum. George and Wilcox look at extremists as persons psychologically prone to extremism, regardless of political affiliation:
“ | Both of us have had the feeling many times that the Bircher with whom we were talking could just as easily have been a Communist and vice versa. It may be merely a question of who “gets to them” first. We tend to view the existence of an extremism-prone personality as a more reasonable hypothesis than attempts to account for the “pathology” of a particular point of view.[3] | ” |
Austrian economist Friedrich Hayek observed a similar phenomenon in the outlook of the rank and file in the communist and fascist movements in Germany before 1933.
“ | The relative ease with which a young communist could be converted into a Nazi or vice versa was well known, best of all to the propagandists of the two parties. [4] | ” |
Most people can hold radical or unorthodox beliefs in a more or less reasonable and rational manner. Extremists present their views in uncompromising, bullying, and often authoritarian ways.[5] American politician and United States Senator, Barry Goldwater highlighted the reasonable and rational use of extremism, by which most people would apply extreme measures, when he said:
“ | I would remind you that extremism, in the defense of liberty, is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation, in the pursuit of justice, is no virtue! [6] | ” |
Extremism is not limited to political ideology. Religion, environment, animal-rights extremists are now common occurrences making news headlines.
George and Wilcox look at extremists as persons psychologically prone to extremism, regardless of political affiliation: Both of us have had the feeling many times that the Bircher with whom we were talking could just as easily have been a Communist and vice versa. It may be merely a question of who “gets to them” first. We tend to view the existence of an extremism-prone personality as a more reasonable hypothesis than attempts to account for the “pathology” of a particular point of view. George and Wilcox list twenty-two common traits of extremists. While all people exhibit some of these traits at times, the important distinction is that “with bona fide extremists, these lapses are not occasional.” The traits are:
Categories: [Political Terms]