From Handwiki In recursion theory, α recursion theory is a generalisation of recursion theory to subsets of admissible ordinals [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha }[/math]. An admissible set is closed under [math]\displaystyle{ \Sigma_1(L_\alpha) }[/math] functions, where [math]\displaystyle{ L_\xi }[/math] denotes a rank of Godel's constructible hierarchy. [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha }[/math] is an admissible ordinal if [math]\displaystyle{ L_{\alpha} }[/math] is a model of Kripke–Platek set theory. In what follows [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha }[/math] is considered to be fixed.
The objects of study in [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha }[/math] recursion are subsets of [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha }[/math]. These sets are said to have some properties:
There are also some similar definitions for functions mapping [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha }[/math] to [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha }[/math]:[3]
Additional connections between recursion theory and α recursion theory can be drawn, although explicit definitions may not have yet been written to formalize them:
We say R is a reduction procedure if it is [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha }[/math] recursively enumerable and every member of R is of the form [math]\displaystyle{ \langle H,J,K \rangle }[/math] where H, J, K are all α-finite.
A is said to be α-recursive in B if there exist [math]\displaystyle{ R_0,R_1 }[/math] reduction procedures such that:
If A is recursive in B this is written [math]\displaystyle{ \scriptstyle A \le_\alpha B }[/math]. By this definition A is recursive in [math]\displaystyle{ \scriptstyle\varnothing }[/math] (the empty set) if and only if A is recursive. However A being recursive in B is not equivalent to A being [math]\displaystyle{ \Sigma_1(L_\alpha[B]) }[/math].
We say A is regular if [math]\displaystyle{ \forall \beta \in \alpha: A \cap \beta \in L_\alpha }[/math] or in other words if every initial portion of A is α-finite.
Shore's splitting theorem: Let A be [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha }[/math] recursively enumerable and regular. There exist [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha }[/math] recursively enumerable [math]\displaystyle{ B_0,B_1 }[/math] such that [math]\displaystyle{ A=B_0 \cup B_1 \wedge B_0 \cap B_1 = \varnothing \wedge A \not\le_\alpha B_i (i\lt 2). }[/math]
Shore's density theorem: Let A, C be α-regular recursively enumerable sets such that [math]\displaystyle{ \scriptstyle A \lt _\alpha C }[/math] then there exists a regular α-recursively enumerable set B such that [math]\displaystyle{ \scriptstyle A \lt _\alpha B \lt _\alpha C }[/math].
Barwise has proved that the sets [math]\displaystyle{ \Sigma_1 }[/math]-definable on [math]\displaystyle{ L_{\alpha^+} }[/math] are exactly the sets [math]\displaystyle{ \Pi_1^1 }[/math]-definable on [math]\displaystyle{ L_\alpha }[/math], where [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha^+ }[/math] denotes the next admissible ordinal above [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha }[/math], and [math]\displaystyle{ \Sigma }[/math] is from the Levy hierarchy.[5]
There is a generalization of limit computability to partial [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha\to\alpha }[/math] functions.[6]
A computational interpretation of [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha }[/math]-recursion exists, using "[math]\displaystyle{ \alpha }[/math]-Turing machines" with a two-symbol tape of length [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha }[/math], that at limit computation steps take the limit inferior of cell contents, state, and head position. For admissible [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha }[/math], a set [math]\displaystyle{ A\subseteq\alpha }[/math] is [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha }[/math]-recursive iff it is computable by an [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha }[/math]-Turing machine, and [math]\displaystyle{ A }[/math] is [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha }[/math]-recursively-enumerable iff [math]\displaystyle{ A }[/math] is the range of a function computable by an [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha }[/math]-Turing machine. [7]
A problem in α-recursion theory which is open (as of 2019) is the embedding conjecture for admissible ordinals, which is whether for all admissible [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha }[/math], the automorphisms of the [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha }[/math]-enumeration degrees embed into the automorphisms of the [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha }[/math]-enumeration degrees.[8]
Some results in [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha }[/math]-recursion can be translated into similar results about second-order arithmetic. This is because of the relationship [math]\displaystyle{ L }[/math] has with the ramified analytic hierarchy, an analog of [math]\displaystyle{ L }[/math] for the language of second-order arithmetic, that consists of sets of integers.[9]
In fact, when dealing with first-order logic only, the correspondence can be close enough that for some results on [math]\displaystyle{ L_\omega=\textrm{HF} }[/math], the arithmetical and Levy hierarchies can become interchangeable. For example, a set of natural numbers is definable by a [math]\displaystyle{ \Sigma_1^0 }[/math] formula iff it's [math]\displaystyle{ \Sigma_1 }[/math]-definable on [math]\displaystyle{ L_\omega }[/math], where [math]\displaystyle{ \Sigma_1 }[/math] is a level of the Levy hierarchy.[10] More generally, definability of a subset of ω over HF with a [math]\displaystyle{ \Sigma_n }[/math] formula coincides with its arithmetical definability using a [math]\displaystyle{ \Sigma_n^0 }[/math] formula.[11]
![]() |
Categories: [Computability theory]