The United Kingdom (full name: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) is a political entity; containing the countries within Great Britain (which are England, Scotland and Wales), and six of nine Ulster Irish counties — known collectively as Northern Ireland or "Ulster" colloquially.
The United Kingdom has lots of history, possibly even too much of it for its own school curriculum. Following the Ice Age, the British Isles were inhabited by various Picts, Celts and "Britons" who didn't know how to write (except for using ogham), but left us numerous enigmatic megalithic monuments such as Stonehenge.
In 43 CE the Romans invaded England and most of Wales, then buggered off again about 450 years later, when the "barbarian" invasions began. The Picts started to pour over Hadrian's Wall, so the local "Romano-Britons" hired Saxon mercenaries to kill them. Unfortunately for the Romanised Britons, the Saxons also started to kill them as well, and migrated to the isles en masse, killing swathes of the "natives". Britain had been one of the most loyal Roman provinces. The UK would've been a very different place if the Roman/Latin culture had prevailed; interesting to theorise along the model of that other center of far-flung Roman colonial culture, Dacia.
During the next four centuries or so, increasing numbers of Angles and Saxons invaded England and settled there, they were getting on quite nicely, until Viking incursions and settlements over the next 200 years swamped three of the four surviving Anglo-Saxon kingdoms, plus much of Caledonia (Scotland) and of Hibernia (Ireland) and all of the Isle of Man. Only 50 years after Wessex (the last Saxon kingdom standing) fought the Vikings to a standstill, an invasion by the Viking-descended Normans (1066) changed everything. The Normans slaughtered the Saxon nobility and more or less remain today as the Tory party. You can perhaps see a pattern forming here: successive waves of invaders nearly always arrived via south-east England, leaving the Celtic-speaking yokels increasingly marginalised in the far-flung fringes of Cornwall, Wales, the Scottish Highlands, and Ireland. The festering legacy of these events still rears its head from time to time to this day. Following this, an elaborate Royal Family tree evolved, featuring Norman, Welsh (Tudor), and German (Hanoverian and Saxe-Coburg-Gotha) admixtures.
The "united" part of the United Kingdom was "properly" established over the course of the sixteenth, seventeenth, eighteenth, and nineteenth centuries, when England beat the piss out of its drunk neighbors, or cobbled together a tenuous union of disparate kingdoms (in the case of the Welsh, shepherds), depending on who you ask. England (which at the time included Wales, annexed to England in 1536) and Scotland became united under a common monarch with the Union of The Crowns in 1603, and then under a common government (1707-1999) following the Act of Union of 1707 officially creating the Kingdom of Great Britain. (The 1707 act was a massive bailout, after the Darien scheme fiasco which resulted in the loss of 20% of all money in Scotland.[1]) Ireland, which had been under de facto English control since 1607, would join in a century later with the Act of Union of 1800, forming the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland on January 1st 1801, which almost immediately began calls for Ireland's secession from the Union, successfully resulting in a series of steadily-devolving Irish governments. Ireland (at least much thereof) finally became an independent state in 1922 and then an independent republic in 1949.
Beginning in the seventeenth century, Britain cobbled together an empire that spanned most of the globe and was the largest by land area ever, surpassing the Russian and Mongol Empires. Eventually, the British Empire suffered great economic damage during the Second World War (1939-1945), which sort of[note 1] allowed the United States to take on much of Britain's former influence via Fort Knox. As the war ended, the United States and the Soviet Union emerged as the world's two superpowers with killing abilities strengthened by modern technology, and the UK, despite independently conquering Ethiopia and developing nuclear deterrents of its own, started losing its empire in a process of decolonization which was mostly over by the mid-1960s. Note that some historians say that the handover of Hong Kong on July 1st, 1997 marked the end of the British Empire[2] — but don't try that line in Gibraltar, Port Stanley, or Diego Garcia.
The UK is governed by a bicameral parliament at Westminster, and headed (little more than nominally) by the reigning monarch, most recently Charles III. In addition to Northern Ireland, this multinational state also includes the principality of Wales and the countries of Scotland and England. Together these are known as the Home Nations. The Channel Islands and the Isle of Man are not part of the United Kingdom, but they are nice to visit.[note 2]
It used to be the case that the mainstream political spectrum was fairly limited. On one hand was the Labour Party, which was social democratic before the 1990s and, until 2015, vaguely Thatcherite. On the other, there is the Conservative or "Tory" Party, which is quite a bit more Thatcherite (duh...), though generally not as far to the right as the GOP in the US.[note 3] The third party, the Liberal Democrats, had a surge in popularity followed by a crashing downpour of hatred upon them upon forming government with the Conservatives; they are very socially democratic and can't seem to make up their mind about how Thatcherite they are.[note 4] However, thanks to certain events, the Overton window has been nuked with an ICBM. With the post-Corbyn Labour Party calling itself the 'salespeople for socialism',[3] (although in practice is generally social democratic) and the Tories' new populist clown god Boris Johnson burning the remains of centre-right one-nation Toryism, actively putting the NHS at risk of collapse while simultaneously lying about it and saying "we're still very centrist I promise",[4] centrism is not looking very popular in Britain right now. Please feign sympathy for the Liberal Democrats.
The Tory-led coalition government (the Liberal Democrats making up the numbers) that governed until May 2015 was pretty much neoliberal — although without any government owned companies to sell off. Having initially campaigned as centre-right moderates, once in power, the coalition moved strongly to the economic right by draconian spending cuts (notably on benefits for the poor, sick, and disabled) and cutting taxes for wealthy people from 50% to 45% (to be fair, Labour only raised the top rate of tax from 40% to 50% in their last few weeks of office when it became clear that they would lose the election so that they could say the Tories were cutting taxes for the rich when they lowered it). The Lib Dem presence in the government was supposed to temper this slightly, but seemed to have failed; for example, student tuition fees were tripled without any meaningful opposition, despite pre-election pledges from Nick Clegg and the Liberal Democrats to fight and resist fees of any form (although, to be fair, 21 of their 57 MPs voted against the bill). While they tackled Labour-generated civil liberties issues by scrapping the ID card scheme and identity databases almost overnight, they have happily kept the highly authoritarian, questionably legal, and massively controversial Control order in force, half-heartedly re-naming them "Terrorist, Prevention and Investigation Measures."
In the May 2015 General Election, the Tories secured a majority and formed their own government, allowing them to bring in even harsher restrictions to the welfare system. Shortly after the election, Labour leader Ed Miliband, Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg, and UKIP's Nigel Farage resigned; the Labour leadership campaign has seen vast popular support for democratic socialist candidate Jeremy Corbyn, as the election was opened to the general public by allowing anyone to register as a party supporter, however, many people who have come out in support of Corbyn — including full members of the party and long-time members of affiliated trade unions — have had their right to vote revoked under the belief that they do not support the values of the Labour Party.
Brexit became the defining issue by 2016; Prime Minister Cameron, fearing his right flank, promised to hold a referendum on Britain's membership in the EU, but it all blew up in his face, forcing him to resign after losing the vote. Leave prevailed over Remain, and Theresa May became the new Prime Minister after everyone else knifed each other in the back and allowed her to sweep in as the compromise candidate. The Labour Party moved for a vote of no confidence against Corbyn, and as mentioned above, tried to strip several members of their right to vote. It didn't matter in the end; Corbyn won reelection in another landslide. Riding high on a double digit lead, Prime Minister May called for a snap election, and was ahead by as many as 24 points, until poor campaigning by the Tories and great policies from Corbyn closed the gap. On the day of the election, Corbyn destroyed May's majority government and forced a hung parliament, revitalizing the left wing in ways not seen since Clement Attlee in 1945.
Fast-forward to late 2018, Brexit had become a complete and utter trainwreck, and the government's approach is so unpopular that really no-one would care if they all burned in hell. Somehow both sides have been completely alienated by a "deal" that pleases no-one and breaks all the promises made by everyone on both sides. Jeremy Corbyn's Labour Party lost their 50:50 split among the electorate as soon as 2019 started, as mass discontent was directed at both leading parties for their handling of Brexit — while the Conservatives regained the support they lost to the Brexit Party by forcing in freshly minted Prime Minister Boris Johnson, Labour did not do the same with Corbyn, and they were unable to recover support in time for the December 2019 general election, giving Johnson an 80+ seat majority. (although the vote share for the Tories only increased by +1%)
As 2020 dawns, the Conservative Party has been given something not even David Cameron could manage — a supermajority, and freedom to do whatever they want. While their platform is extremely unstable, since they ran GE2019 on 'doing Brexit' and 'stop antisemite bastard commulist Jeremy Corbyn' — both things that will be old news by 2024 — their opposition has been left in shambles, and will be fighting an uphill battle to even come close to winning again. British centrism has been left smoldering, with the now all-powerful Tories being the furthest right they've been in half a century.
By the latter half of 2022, much had changed. Boris Johnson, after even his own party had grown tired of his incessant untruths, had been ousted from Number Ten and, following a long drawn out selection process, was replaced by former Foreign Secretary Liz Truss. It may just be a coincidence that Queen Elizabeth II died less than 48 hours after appointing Truss as Prime Minister. In pretty short order, the new administration had overseen an uncontrolled flight into terrain by the pound sterling.[5] and had seen Labour's lead in the opinion polls reach reach an unprecedented 33%[6] Truss would ultimately end up being the shortest-serving prime minister in the history of the UK, resigning on 20 October 2022, but not before she and her government blew a £30 billion hole in the economy.
A remarkable phenomenon of recent times is the disintegration of the "British nation". More and more people identify primarily by their national identity — Irish, Scottish, Welsh, or English, with most of Ireland already a separate country. Scotland had an independence referendum in 2014 (the 700 year anniversary of the Battle of Bannockburn), although they did (narrowly) choose to stay. On the other side, there is little appetite for Welsh or English independence from Westminster.
Northern Ireland remains an outlier, with a significant minority favoring unification with the Republic of Ireland and the rest preferring to remain with the UK, and a minority remaining indifferent. The rise of UKIP in recent years is at least partly attributable to gains for English nationalism, an ideology that was dormant for nigh on two hundred years.
Further still is the issue of Cornwall's continued insistence on its existence. Ed Miliband's Shadow Chancellor came out in support of Cornish devolution in January 2015, but nothing happened. If anything did happen, it would present a bit of a problem — Cornwall shares much of its economy with its neighboring region in Devon, and both have merged their joint police force with their immediate neighbor in Dorset. Its neighbor to the north, Somerset, is interested in devolved powers as well. The question becomes: If we devolve powers to a Cornish Assembly, or Queen forbid, Cornish Parliament, are we to merge Devon into Cornwall, Devon and Dorset plus Cornwall, or Devon and Dorset with Somerset into Cornwall? (Or maybe bring back Wessex?)
Jeremy Corbyn, in the run-up to the 2017 election, promised to introduce federalization in the UK. The idea is to decentralize power from Westminster and grant greater autonomy to the countries of the United Kingdom, comparable to the United States.
The UK does not suffer from right-wing evangelical loonies to the same degree as the colonies they lost.[note 5] Britain, sadly, still has a few of them, but they are less powerful, and they are not really a problem except in Northern Ireland, where their tendency to oppress the native Catholics moved said Catholics to revolt. In the UK, it is just not cricket to go on and on about God, Jesus, etc., especially when mixed with politics — probably because the British know perfectly well where that combination got them in earlier times. If the people weren't so British, they'd likely get a good kicking if they did. But they would more likely receive dirty looks and raised eyebrows, or be carted off to the local lunatic asylum psychiatric hospital for the rest of their life.
For example, former Prime Minister Tony Blair waited until he was out of office before "coming out" as a Roman Catholic, since he was advised by Alistair Campbell (his PR adviser Minister of Propaganda) that "We don't do God." On the other hand, Nick Clegg, former Deputy Prime Minister of the UK, revealed he was an atheist during an interview with the BBC.[7]
The notable exception to all of this is the issue of Islamic fundamentalism. Of the four suicide bombers responsible for the 7/7 terrorist attacks in London, all but one were born in England.[8][9][10] More recently, London imam Usama Hasan was forced to retract controversial statements (namely, that people evolved from apes and that Muslim women don't have to cover their hair) after receiving death threats from whack-a-doodles.[11] Unusually, the Islamic community in Britain appears to have a stronger fundamentalist component than Muslim communities elsewhere in Europe. In 2009, Muslims from Britain, France, and Germany were interviewed for a Gallup poll, one of the questions being whether homosexuality is morally acceptable. 35% of the French Muslims agreed; 19% of the German Muslims agreed; but none of the 500 British Muslims interviewed for the poll agreed.[12][13]
Polls agree that religious belief in the UK is declining in the long-term; according to some polls, more than half the UK population do not believe in God or are not religious[14] and more than half the teenagers consider themselves atheists.[15][16] How UK people answer about their religious belief depends partly on how questions are phrased.[17] The majority feel the Church of England is out of touch and provides bad moral leadership.[18] Of the four constituent countries of the UK, only England has an established state church, the Church of England (obviously). The C of E was disestablished in Wales in 1920, whereupon the former Welsh dioceses became the Church in Wales (sic); the Church of Ireland was disestablished in 1871; and Scotland has never had an established church, though such a status has often been erroneously attributed to the Church of Scotland (which is Presbyterian, not Anglican — the Anglican church in Scotland is the Scottish Episcopal Church). Religions which are native to the United Kingdom include Wicca and neo-Druidism.[19][20]
In 2012, the Prime Minister David Cameron promoted a Muslim, Sayeeda Warsi, to be Minister of Faith, then in April 2014, Cameron made claims that Britain was still a Christian country.[21] The claim that Britain is still Christian received a mixed reception, including a letter to the Daily Telegraph signed by secular figures such as Terry Pratchett, Tim Minchin, and Philip Pullman.[22]. Most religious leaders did not have any problem with the remarks, but the public reception gave the impression of a growing trend of secularism. An opinion poll showed the number in England and Wales without religion climbed from 25% in 2011 to 48.5% in 2014 and outnumbers all Christians at only 43.8%. 4 out of 10 raised as Anglicans now identify as having no religion and almost as many raised Roman Catholic are now 'nones'. In Scotland, those not religious are even higher at 52% of the population.[23] In 2017, a survey showed the majority are now not religious and the proportion of non-religious responders is highest among young people.[14][24]
The following statistics are from the 2011 census.[note 6][25][26]
Religion | Number | Percentage |
---|---|---|
Christianity | 37,583,962 | 59.5 |
Islam | 2,786,635 | 4.4 |
Hinduism | 835,394 | 1.3 |
Sikhism | 432,429 | 0.7 |
Judaism | 269,568 | 0.4 |
Buddhism | 261,584 | 0.4 |
Other | 262,774 | 0.4 |
None | 16,221,509 | 25.7 |
Not stated | 4,528,323 | 7.2 |
The UK has its own currency unit, called the Pound Sterling (sign: £, code: GBP) because it used to be worth a Troy pound of sterling silver way back when. Even when it was part of the European Union, the UK wasn't part of the Eurozone, and even had an opt-out clause shared only with Denmark — partly because the Pound is such a strong currency worldwide. While the currency used to be a mess of farthings, florins, and sixpences, it has been fully decimalized since 1971.
Just to confuse people, two banks in Northern Ireland issue money, and three in Scotland, including one which does not have the word "Scotland" in its name — the Clydesdale.
For historical reasons, banknotes issued in England, Scotland, and Northern Ireland have different designs, going so far as to being different sizes and incorporating different imagery. Despite that, all notes are legal tender across all of the UK, and have the same value. Still, in more practical terms, shopkeepers in England and Wales may refuse banknotes from Scotland and Northern Ireland. There are various reasons for this, but chief among them is that they are less familiar with these banknotes, and are concerned about forgeries being more difficult to spot in unfamiliar cash. Bank tellers, however, are more experienced, and will happily exchange one type of note for another if you ask.
The Bank of England has recently gradually introduced 'indestructible' plastic banknotes and the old paper ones are being withdrawn. Unfortunately, the plastic money is not completely indestructible and seems to retain creases forever.
Previous surveys on paper banknotes have shown that up to 99% of all UK banknotes are contaminated with trace amounts of cocaine.[27][28] With some claiming that all banknotes carry traces of cocaine.[29] This can cause people to fail fingerprint drug tests if they have recently handled money.[30] It is also very difficult to use the new plastic notes to snort cocaine (because they are hard to roll up), and they could prove to be cocaine free due to this and the fact they stay cleaner due to their plastic surface which is less adhesive to contaminents.[31]
The remnants of empire are scattered around the globe, often under obscure legal arrangements, such as Crown Dependencies and British Overseas Territory. Some have independent parliaments and are only reliant on the UK for defence and foreign policy; others are ruled more directly. There doesn't seem to be a strong desire for independence by any, and residents are often fonder of Union Jacks and the Royal Family than residents of the British mainland are.
A small tax haven located between Britain and Ireland.
Just off the coast of France, but British since William the Conqueror became king of England in the 11th century. More recently a source of Brexit-related dispute.[32]
A British Overseas Territory in Spain, ceded to Britain in 1713 and ruled by the British ever since; it is strategically important as a port that can control access to the Mediterranean sea. Residents voted to remain under British rule in 1967 and 2002. The Spanish want it back, and have blockaded it at various times. When Britain was in the EU, that guaranteed a free border (more or less), but Brexit has once again antagonized the Spanish and threatened tension.[33] Gibraltar is notably the only place in Europe that still has wild monkeys.
A small archipelago that is notable for three things: landmines, penguins, and pissing off Argentine nationalists.
British military bases on Cyprus which since Cypriot independence in 1960 remains a (British) Crown colony.[34] Given the situation in Northern Cyprus, things aren't likely to change here soon.
Bermuda (of the shorts), Anguilla (not Antigua), British Virgin Islands (not US Virgin Islands), Montserrat (not Mauritius or Martinique), Cayman Islands (not crocodiles), and Turks and Caicos Islands (definitely not Turkey) are six overseas territories around the Caribbean and nearby North Atlantic. Most are sunny; most are also involved in money-laundering or tax avoidance.[35][36]
Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha together form a territory of very isolated islands. Tristan da Cunha is in fact the most isolated inhabited island in the world, being 2,436 kilometers/1,514 miles from the closest civilization in St. Helena, which is itself incredibly isolated — so much so that Napoleon Bonaparte was sent there after he lost the Battle of Waterloo.[37]
No relation to this Georgia or that Georgia, it's a non-permanently inhabited archipelago that makes the Falkland Islands seem fun. However, Argentina has their eyes on them as well.
Most of the British Empire's holdings in the Pacific were transferred to Australia and New Zealand, but for whatever reason they still have Pitcairn, Henderson, Ducie and Oeno Islands, only the former of which is (barely) inhabited.
This list of miscellaneous information is endorsed by the RationalWiki Pub Quiz Team!
Americans often think that the terms "United Kingdom", "Britain", and "England" can be used interchangeably,[note 7] which just shows what they know. For the record: England, Scotland, and Wales make up the island called Great Britain. Add Northern Ireland (and lots of other smaller islands) and you have the United Kingdom. The "British Isles" is the physical landmass which includes all the small islands. "Britain" (minus the "Great") doesn't actually have any meaning but tends to be used interchangeably with "Great Britain." See, easy.
In 2010, the Commons Foreign Affairs committee tried to distance the United Kingdom from the USA, saying that we shouldn't speak of the "Special Relationship". They also seemed to imply that the UK needs to just accept it isn't a superpower, and get on with being a group of small islands.[38] Some feel this only continues a descent from "Great" Britain to "Good" Britain to "I-Suppose-It's-OK-If-You-Like-That-Sort-Of-Thing" Britain, despite the fact that "Great Britain" simply means "Bigger than Brittany," which isn't all that impressive to start with.
The UK is a client state of the USA, and there are many American forces stationed there, for the purpose of the UK's "national defence". On top of that, recent Prime Minister Boris Johnson is, in addition to being a British Citizen, a U.S. National, although no longer a U.S. citizen as he has now renounced his U.S. citizenship. He has been widely described as "Britain's Trump", and is a close friend of U.S. President Donald Trump who mirrors many things that he does. This obviously does not in any way, shape, or form, compromise the UK's sovereignty over its own territory, in spite of the fact that most other democratic countries in the world do not permit the Head of State (or equivalent) to appoint a foreign national as the Head of Government.
The Union Flag is commonly called the Union Jack. For pedants the term "Jack" should only be applied to the Union Flag when it is flown as a jack from an actual jackstaff, that is, at the bow of a ship. Its first and most common use after 1606 would have most likely been as a jack, flying as part of the Royal Navy that at the time would have been extremely powerful. The Flag Institute of the United Kingdom states that either is fine, as the distinction between "flag" and "jack" is a relatively recent idea and that "Union Jack" is officially acknowledged in any context.[39]
As is the case with many other national flags, the Union Flag, when flown upside down, signifies that the flier of the flag is in distress. Unfortunately for the British, the Union Flag when flown upside down isn't notably different to the Union Flag when it is flown the right way up — in fact, an upside-down Union Flag looks identical to a right-side-up Union Flag seen from the back — so the British generally rely on radio-communications equipment and the Daily Mail to express any distress that they may be feeling.
While the United Kingdom has a national anthem used to represent the state collectively ("God Save the Queen"), Wales is the only member nation to have an officially recognised national anthem ("Hen Wlad Fy Nhadau"), neither England, Scotland, nor Northern Ireland having national anthems recognised by the national or devolved governments. Scotland most notably uses "Flower of Scotland" at international sporting events such as football and rugby union, while England used the national anthem of the UK at said sporting events. Northern Ireland has used "Londonderry Air" set to the lyrics of "Danny Boy" as an anthem at the Commonwealth Games[40] while doing the English thing and using God Save the Queen for football.[note 8] Movements have arisen in England and Scotland calling for individual anthems to be adopted,[41] sparking some debate, though not enough to cause a major political stir over it. The most popular proposed national anthems for Scotland are "Flower of Scotland", "Scotland the Brave", and "Highland Cathedral", while the most popular proposed national anthems for England are "God Save the Queen", "Jerusalem", and "Land of Hope and Glory", the latter of which was supported by 55% of respondents to a 2006 poll by the BBC. At the 2014 Commonwealth Games, "Jerusalem" was played when England won gold medals, avoiding any confusion over which of the nations might have been represented by "God Save the Queen". Note that the full original lyrics of "God Save the King", which dates from the campaign against the Jacobite Rebellion of 1745, include a verse about crushing the "rebellious Scots".
Like any country, the UK has some legal or political quirks. An example would be television licensing in the United Kingdom,[42][43] or English defamation law, the latter of which unfortunately offered enough cover for SLAPP suits that the United States felt a need to pass the 2010 SPEECH Act.[44][45] The UK's establishment is also known (particularly since about the time of the death of Lucy Meadows) for its near dogmatic hatred and scorn for transgender people,[46][47][48] earning the place an undesired nickname, TERF Island.
There are a number of possible ways to refer to people who are citizens of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. One issue many have is that many refer to people from Great Britain, of which Northern Ireland is not a part of.
An archaic term that the Romans used to refer to the people of Britain during the occupation. Largely fallen out with the populace, understandably so. Anyone using it who isn't a professor of history is in danger of being bundled into an ambulance and carted off for psychiatric examination.
One way is to use the adjective "British," as in "a British person" or a British product. Although this is a relatively neutral term to which the majority would not object, it has a few problems. One is that although the majority would not object, some would. For instance, scrubbing out "British" on forms and replacing it with "English" as if that changes things. It is also a bit long winded. Alternatively, you can say, "He's British", "She's British", "They're British."
Although newspapers sometimes use this word as in, "Three Britons Hurt in Exploding Moose Shock," the word "Briton" is rarely used in informal conversation. Indeed, when used in conversation, most people would think of the "Ancient Britons" — the pre-Roman inhabitants of present-day Wales and England.
This shortened form of the word is used and accepted by many — but not all — of the inhabitants of the islands. For various reasons, some people do not seem to like the title. For example, as can be seen from the full name of the kingdom, it also includes the inhabitants of Northern Ireland. As a proportion of the citizens of this part, and indeed most parts, of the world, are anti-British and the region has a special status, some inhabitants would prefer to be called something else.
This term was coined by American sailors to refer to British sailors when they discovered that they used to drink lime juice in order to combat scurvy. It is generally not appreciated by citizens of the United Kingdom, especially in the common construction "Limey bastard."
Also shortened to "Pom," this is a term used primarily in Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa to denote anyone of British nationality. It is (apparently) considered offensive, particularly in the common construction "whinging Pommy bastard". It may have something to do with pomegranates (i.e. fresh-off-the-boat/plane UK citizens being cooked to that color under the Queensland sun). Or it could be a phonetic rendering of POHM (Prisoner of His/Her Majesty) due to most people from the UK arriving in Australia as convicts. Or it could be both of these, or neither, or something else.[49]
This term has been proposed as a possible solution but it suffers from a number of shortcomings. It is almost unpronounceable, unknown internationally and neither used nor accepted by any significant population in the UK.
Another obvious solution would be to call inhabitants according to their country/principality. It is, however, regrettable that most of the "local" names would run into some national or international problem.
The nationalism resulting from the increasing fragmentation of the UK has led to the rejection of the word Brit by much of the population. This "devolution" of Wales and Scotland did spark a trend of fairly serious suggestions for other parts of England to devolve power away from the London based parliament of the UK. This would lead to places like Cornwall and Northumberland essentially having their own parliament... whatever next.
Categories: [United Kingdom] [European countries] [NATO member states] [Crimes against humanity] [Imperialism] [Racism] [Transphobia]