When a microscopic machine (e.g. a MEM) performs useful work it generates heat and entropy as a byproduct of the process, however it is also predicted that this machine will operate in "reverse" or "backwards" over appreciable short periods. That is, heat energy from the surroundings will be converted into useful work. For larger engines, this would be described as a violation of the second law of thermodynamics, as entropy is consumed rather than generated. Loschmidt's paradox[1] states that in a time reversible system, for every trajectory there exists a time-reversed anti-trajectory. As the entropy production of a trajectory and its equal anti-trajectory are of identical magnitude but opposite sign, then, so the argument goes, one cannot prove that entropy production is positive.[2]
For a long time, exact results in thermodynamics were only possible in linear systems capable of reaching equilibrium, leaving other questions like the Loschmidt paradox unsolved. During the last few decades fresh approaches have revealed general laws applicable to non-equilibrium system which are described by nonlinear equations, pushing the range of exact thermodynamic statements beyond the realm of traditional linear solutions. These exact results are particularly relevant for small systems where appreciable (typically non-Gaussian) fluctuations occur. Thanks to stochastic thermodynamics it is now possible to accurately predict distribution functions of thermodynamic quantities relating to exchanged heat, applied work or entropy production for these systems.[3]
Fluctuation theorem
Main page: Physics:Fluctuation theorem
The mathematical resolution to Loschmidt's paradox is called the (steady state) fluctuation theorem (FT), which is a generalisation of the second law of thermodynamics. The FT shows that as a system gets larger or the trajectory duration becomes longer, entropy-consuming trajectories become more unlikely, and the expected second law behaviour is recovered.
The FT was first put forward by Evans et al. (1993)({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) and much of the work done in developing and extending the theorem was accomplished by theoreticians and mathematicians interested in nonequilibrium statistical mechanics.[lower-alpha 1][2]
The first observation and experimental proof of Evan's fluctuation theorem (FT) was performed by Wang et al. (2002)({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})
Jarzynski equality
Main page: Jarzynski equality
A recent review states that Jarzynski (1997a, 1997b) "proved a remarkable relation which allows to express the free energy difference between two equilibrium systems by a nonlinear average over the work required to drive the system in a non-equilibrium process from one state to the other. By comparing probability distributions for the work spent in the original process with the time-reversed one, Crooks found a “refinement” of the Jarzynski relation (JR),[4] now called the Crooks fluctuation theorem. Both, this relation and another refinement of the JR, the Hummer-Szabo relation became particularly useful for determining free energy differences and landscapes of biomolecules. These relations are the most prominent ones within a class of exact results (some of which found even earlier and then rediscovered) valid for non-equilibrium systems driven by time-dependent forces. A close analogy to the JR, which relates different equilibrium states, is the Hatano-Sasa relation that applies to transitions between two different non-equilibrium steady states".[5]
This is shown to be a special case of a more general relation.
Stochastic energetics
History
Classical thermodynamics, at its heart, deals with general laws governing the transformations of a system, in particular, those involving the exchange of heat, work and matter with an environment. As a central result, total entropy production is identified that in any such process can never decrease, leading, inter alia, to fundamental limits on the efficiency of heat engines and refrigerators.[3]
The thermodynamic characterisation of systems in equilibrium got its microscopic justification from equilibrium statistical mechanics which states that for a system in contact with a heat bath the probability to find it in any specific microstate is given by the Boltzmann factor. For small deviations from equilibrium, linear response theory allows to express transport properties caused by small external fields through equilibrium correlation functions. On a more phenomenological level, linear irreversible thermodynamics provides a relation between such transport coefficients and entropy production in terms of forces and fluxes. Beyond this linear response regime, for a long time, no universal exact results were available.[3]
During the last 20 years fresh approaches have revealed general laws applicable to non-equilibrium system thus pushing the range of validity of exact thermodynamic statements beyond the realm of linear response deep into the genuine non-equilibrium region. These exact results, which become particularly relevant for small systems with appreciable (typically non-Gaussian) fluctuations, generically refer to distribution functions of thermodynamic quantities like exchanged heat, applied work or entropy production.[3]
Stochastic thermodynamics combines the stochastic energetics introduced by Sekimoto (1998)[6] with the idea that entropy can consistently be assigned to a single fluctuating trajectory.[6]
Open research
Quantum stochastic thermodynamics
Main page: Physics:Quantum thermodynamics
Stochastic thermodynamics can be applied to driven (i.e. open) quantum systems whenever the effects of quantum coherence can be ignored. The dynamics of an open quantum system is then equivalent to a classical stochastic one. However, this is sometimes at the cost of requiring unrealistic measurements at the beginning and end of a process.[lower-alpha 2][7]
Understanding non-equilibrium quantum thermodynamics more broadly is an important and active area of research. The efficiency of some computing and information theory tasks can be greatly enhanced when using quantum correlated states; quantum correlations can be used not only as a valuable resource in quantum computation, but also in the realm of quantum thermodynamics.[8] New types of quantum devices in non-equilibrium states function very differently to their classical counterparts. For example, it has been theoretically shown that non-equilibrium quantum ratchet systems function far more efficiently then that predicted by classical thermodynamics.[lower-alpha 3][9] It has also been shown that quantum coherence can be used to enhance the efficiency of systems beyond the classical Carnot limit. This is because it could be possible to extract work, in the form of photons, from a single heat bath. Quantum coherence can be used in effect to play the role of Maxwell's demon[10] though the broader information theory based interpretation of the second law of thermodynamics is not violated.[lower-alpha 4][13]
Quantum versions of stochastic thermodynamics have been studied for some time[lower-alpha 5] and the past few years have seen a surge of interest in this topic.[lower-alpha 2] Quantum mechanics involves profound issues around the interpretation of reality (e.g. the Copenhagen interpretation, many-worlds, de Broglie-Bohm theory etc are all competing interpretations that try to explain the unintuitive results of quantum theory) . It is hoped that by trying to specify the quantum-mechanical definition of work, dealing with open quantum systems, analyzing exactly solvable models, or proposing and performing experiments to test non-equilibrium predictions,[lower-alpha 6] important insights into the interpretation of quantum mechanics and the true nature of reality will be gained.[15]
Applications of non-equilibrium work relations, like the Jarzynski equality, have recently been proposed for the purposes of detecting quantum entanglement (Hide Vedral) and to improving optimization problems (minimize or maximize a function of multivariables called the cost function) via quantum annealing (Ohzeki Nishimori).[15]
Active baths
Until recently thermodynamics has only considered systems coupled to a thermal bath and, therefore, satisfying Boltzmann statistics. However, some systems do not satisfy these conditions and are far from equilibrium such as living matter, for which fluctuations are expected to be non-Gaussian.[16]
Active particle systems are able to take energy from their environment and drive themselves far from equilibrium. An important example of active matter is constituted by objects capable of self propulsion. Thanks to this property, they feature a series of novel behaviours that are not attainable by matter at thermal equilibrium, including, for example, swarming and the emergence of other collective properties.[17] A passive particle is considered in an active bath when it is in an environment where a wealth of active particles are present. These particles will exert nonthermal forces on the passive object so that it will experience non-thermal fluctuations and will behave widely different from a passive Brownian particle in a thermal bath. The presence of an active bath can significantly influence the microscopic thermodynamics of a particle. Experiments have suggested that the Jarzynski equality does not hold in some cases due to the presence of non-Boltzmann statistics in active baths.[lower-alpha 7] This observation points towards a new direction in the study of non-equilibrium statistical physics and stochastic thermodynamics, where also the environment itself is far from equilibrium.[19]
Active baths are a question of particular importance in biochemistry. For example, biomolecules within cells are coupled with an active bath due to the presence of molecular motors within the cytoplasm, which leads to striking and largely not yet understood phenomena such as the emergence of anomalous diffusion (Barkai et al., 2012). Also, protein folding might be facilitated by the presence of active fluctuations (Harder et al., 2014b) and active matter dynamics could play a central role in several biological functions (Mallory et al., 2015; Shin et al., 2015; Suzuki et al., 2015). It is an open question to what degree stochastic thermodynamics can be applied to systems coupled to active baths.[16]
References
Notes
↑Evan's original numerical analysis was shown heuristically and related to a thermostatted shear-driven fluid in contact with a heat bath. It was later mathematically proven for a large class of systems using concepts from chaotic dynamics by Gallavotti & Cohen (1995), for driven Langevin dynamics by Kurchan (1998) and for driven diffusive dynamics by Lebowitz & Spohn (1999). A variant, a transient fluctuation theorem valid for relaxation towards the steady state was later found by Evans & Searles (1994).[3]
↑ 2.02.1See Esposito et al. (2009) and Campisi et al. (2011) for academic review articles on non-equilibrium quantum fluctuations[7]
↑See for example Yukawa et al. (1997), Reimann et al. (1997), Tatara et al. (1998)[9]
↑See for example Scully (2001),({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})
Scully et al. (2003),[10] Dillenschneider & Lutz (2009),[11] Roßnagel et al. (2014),({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) and Roßnagel et al. (2016)[12]
↑See for example Yukawa (2000)({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) and Mukamel (2003)({{{1}}}, {{{2}}})
↑ See for example Huber et al. (2008)({{{1}}}, {{{2}}}) and An et al. (2014)[14]
↑See for example Argun et al. (2016)[18]
Citations
↑Loschmidt 1876.
↑ 2.02.1Wang et al. 2002, p. 050601-1.
↑ 3.03.13.23.33.4Seifert 2012, p. 6.
↑Crooks 1999.
↑Seifert 2012, p. 2.
↑ 6.06.1Seifert 2008, p. 1.
↑ 7.07.1Seifert 2012, p. 9.
↑Dillenschneider & Lutz 2009, p. 6.
↑ 9.09.1Yukawa 2000, p. 1.
↑ 10.010.1Maruyama et al. 2009, p. 20.
↑Modi et al. 2012, p. 43.
↑Cartlidge 2015.
↑Dillenschneider & Lutz 2009, pp. 5-6.
↑Roßnagel et al. 2016, p. 1.
↑ 15.015.1Jarzynski 2011, p. 348.
↑ 16.016.1Bechinger et al. 2016, p. 45.
↑Bechinger et al. 2016, p. 2.
↑Bechinger et al. 2016, p. 12, 26, 45.
↑Bechinger et al. 2016, p. 26.
Academic references
An, Shuoming; Zhang, Jing-Ning; Um, Mark; Lv, Dingshun; Lu, Yao; Zhang, Junhua; Yin, Zhang-Qi; Quan, H. T. et al. (2014). "Experimental test of the quantum Jarzynski equality with a trapped-ion system". Nature Physics11 (2): 193–199. doi:10.1038/nphys3197. ISSN 1745-2473. Bibcode: 2015NatPh..11..193A.
Argun, Aykut; Moradi, Ali-Reza; Pince, Erçağ; Bagci, Gokhan Baris; Volpe, Giovanni (2016). "Experimental evidence of the failure of Jarzynski equality in active bath". arXiv:1601.01123 [cond-mat.soft].
Bechinger, Clemens; Di Leonardo, Roberto; Löwen, Hartmut; Reichhardt, Charles; Volpe, Giorgio; Volpe, Giovanni (2016). "Active Particles in Complex and Crowded Environments". Reviews of Modern Physics88 (4): 045006. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.88.045006. ISSN 0034-6861. Bibcode: 2016RvMP...88d5006B.
Bertini, Lorenzo; De Sole, Alberto; Gabrielli, Davide; Jona-Lasinio, Giovanni; Landim, Claudio (2015). "Macroscopic fluctuation theory". Reviews of Modern Physics87 (2): 593–636. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.87.593. ISSN 0034-6861. Bibcode: 2015RvMP...87..593B.
Campisi, Michele; Hänggi, Peter; Talkner, Peter (2011). "Colloquium: Quantum fluctuation relations: Foundations and applications". Reviews of Modern Physics83 (3): 771–791. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.83.771. ISSN 0034-6861. Bibcode: 2011RvMP...83..771C.
Crooks, Gavin E. (1999). "Entropy production fluctuation theorem and the nonequilibrium work relation for free energy differences". Physical Review E60 (3): 2721–2726. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.60.2721. PMID 11970075. Bibcode: 1999PhRvE..60.2721C. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.60.2721.
Dillenschneider, R.; Lutz, E. (2009). "Energetics of quantum correlations". EPL (Europhysics Letters)88 (5): 50003. doi:10.1209/0295-5075/88/50003. ISSN 0295-5075. Bibcode: 2009EL.....8850003D.
Esposito, Massimiliano; Harbola, Upendra; Mukamel, Shaul (2009). "Nonequilibrium fluctuations, fluctuation theorems, and counting statistics in quantum systems". Reviews of Modern Physics81 (4): 1665–1702. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1665. ISSN 0034-6861. Bibcode: 2009RvMP...81.1665E. http://orbilu.uni.lu/handle/10993/12322.
Evans, Denis J.; Cohen, E. G. D.; Morriss, G. P. (1993). "Probability of second law violations in shearing steady states". Physical Review Letters71 (15): 2401–2404. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.2401. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 10054671. Bibcode: 1993PhRvL..71.2401E.
Evans, Denis J.; Searles, Debra J. (1994). "Equilibrium microstates which generate second law violating steady states". Physical Review E50 (2): 1645–1648. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.50.1645. ISSN 1063-651X. PMID 9962139. Bibcode: 1994PhRvE..50.1645E. https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/data/UQ_282872/UQ282872_OA.pdf?Expires=1485950218&Signature=eUBZHEJA3prgm9GwaQku-HKTPc69--dGpJIykI8jhYJZyY8G~4qIkyRNw5fSEK0-kc1v5zW3EuWl3V1wrPenYFpux-xmQNQ6hAu5d9F5D3OgCVo9GHTomPn~1QWVgUbcY9DP7pZ91uq1OofnoBArWKsb7217CXJN0ElMkqX6-lfZQwi467u1R8Acd2O82ZgX8r8WCVN5Aoxun0mmFV1cihayaz7Wg~JT~CQkGzlwXYMHaR-dy92kLY28EXvgju7F2d2XdkVm3EX~pisQB5vPmLsc6SUiUgQOepNWmsmaj8idywP76JEQCm0BNZ0Zt-sdwf0Ww.
Gallavotti, G.; Cohen, E. G. D. (2 April 1995). "Dynamical Ensembles in Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics". Physical Review Letters74 (14): 2694–2697. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.2694. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 10057994. Bibcode: 1995PhRvL..74.2694G.
Jarzynski, C. (1997a). "Nonequilibrium Equality for Free Energy Differences". Physical Review Letters78 (14): 2690–2693. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2690. ISSN 0031-9007. Bibcode: 1997PhRvL..78.2690J.
Jarzynski, C. (1997b). "Equilibrium free-energy differences from nonequilibrium measurements: A master-equation approach". Physical Review E56 (5): 5018–5035. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.56.5018. ISSN 1063-651X. Bibcode: 1997PhRvE..56.5018J.
Jarzynski, Christopher (2011). "Equalities and Inequalities: Irreversibility and the Second Law of Thermodynamics at the Nanoscale". Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics2 (1): 329–351. doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-062910-140506. ISSN 1947-5454. Bibcode: 2011ARCMP...2..329J. http://newton.kias.re.kr/~brane/wc2012/download/Jarzynski_annurev-conmatphys-062910-140506.pdf.
Kurchan, Jorge (1998). "Fluctuation theorem for stochastic dynamics". Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General31 (16): 3719–3729. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/31/16/003. ISSN 0305-4470. Bibcode: 1998JPhA...31.3719K.
Lebowitz, Joel L.; Spohn, Herbert (1999). "A Gallavotti–Cohen-Type Symmetry in the Large Deviation Functional for Stochastic Dynamics". Journal of Statistical Physics95 (1/2): 333–365. doi:10.1023/A:1004589714161. ISSN 0022-4715. Bibcode: 1999JSP....95..333L.
Loschmidt, Joseph (1876). "Über den Zustand des Wärmegleichgewichtes eines Systems von Körpern mit Rücksicht auf die Schwerkraft" (in de). Sitzungsber. Der Kais. Akad. D. W. Math. Naturw. II73: 128.
Maruyama, Koji; Nori, Franco; Vedral, Vlatko (2009). "Colloquium: The physics of Maxwell's demon and information". Reviews of Modern Physics81 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1. ISSN 0034-6861. Bibcode: 2009RvMP...81....1M.
Modi, Kavan; Brodutch, Aharon; Cable, Hugo; Paterek, Tomasz; Vedral, Vlatko (2012). "The classical-quantum boundary for correlations: Discord and related measures". Reviews of Modern Physics84 (4): 1655–1707. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.84.1655. ISSN 0034-6861. Bibcode: 2012RvMP...84.1655M.
Mukamel, Shaul (2003). "Quantum Extension of the Jarzynski Relation: Analogy with Stochastic Dephasing". Physical Review Letters90 (17): 170604. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.170604. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 12786064. Bibcode: 2003PhRvL..90q0604M. http://mukamel.ps.uci.edu/publications/pdfs/457.pdf.
Pal, P. S.; Deffner, Sebastian (2020). "Stochastic thermodynamics of relativistic Brownian motion". New Journal of Physics22 (7): 073054. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ab9ce6. Bibcode: 2020NJPh...22g3054P.
Peliti, Luca; Pigolotti, Simone (2021). Stochastic Thermodynamics: An Introduction. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-85103-9.
Roßnagell, J.; Dawkins, S. T.; Tolazzi, K. N.; Abah, O.; Lutz, E.; Schmidt-Kaler, F.; Singer, K. (2016). "A single-atom heat engine". Science352 (6283): 325–329. doi:10.1126/science.aad6320. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 27081067. Bibcode: 2016Sci...352..325R.
Scully, Marlan O. (2001). "Extracting Work from a Single Thermal Bath via Quantum Negentropy". Physical Review Letters87 (22): 220601. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.220601. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 11736390. Bibcode: 2001PhRvL..87v0601S.
Scully, Marlan O.; Zubairy, M. Suhail; Agarwal, Girish S.; Walther, Herbert. (2003). "Extracting Work from a Single Heat Bath via Vanishing Quantum Coherence". Science299 (5608): 862–864. doi:10.1126/science.1078955. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 12511655. Bibcode: 2003Sci...299..862S.
Seifert, U. (2008). "Stochastic thermodynamics: principles and perspectives". The European Physical Journal B64 (3–4): 423–431. doi:10.1140/epjb/e2008-00001-9. ISSN 1434-6028. Bibcode: 2008EPJB...64..423S.
Seifert, Udo (2012). "Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation theorems and molecular machines". Reports on Progress in Physics75 (12): 126001. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/75/12/126001. ISSN 0034-4885. PMID 23168354. Bibcode: 2012RPPh...75l6001S.
Sekimoto, Ken (1998). "Langevin Equation and Thermodynamics". Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement130: 17–27. doi:10.1143/PTPS.130.17. ISSN 0375-9687. Bibcode: 1998PThPS.130...17S. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/els/110001208700.pdf?id=ART0001546607&type=pdf&lang=en&host=cinii&order_no=&ppv_type=0&lang_sw=&no=1485783327&cp=.
Tatara, Gen; Kikuchi, Makoto; Yukawa, Satoshi; Matsukawa, Hiroshi (1998). "Dissipation Enhanced Asymmetric Transport in Quantum Ratchets". Journal of the Physical Society of Japan67 (4): 1090–1093. doi:10.1143/JPSJ.67.1090. ISSN 0031-9015. Bibcode: 1998JPSJ...67.1090T.
Wang, G. M.; Sevick, E. M.; Mittag, Emil; Searles, Debra J.; Evans, Denis J. (2002). "Experimental Demonstration of Violations of the Second Law of Thermodynamics for Small Systems and Short Time Scales". Physical Review Letters89 (5): 050601. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.050601. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 12144431. Bibcode: 2002PhRvL..89e0601W. https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/data/UQ_282878/UQ282878_OA.pdf?Expires=1485941550&Signature=GMF-QnYunEhzAIL7LoBi5JXUu6w6yy5nTAmd1p6~pi~3hWHN5ZpsVyoF~mRY92XtSTK6zyOYVxRnICr1QrD7RXx1Fyga19kMXa0qGS6bIVka~I0alobclJBOtI81XUcrUZcKYIHRXc5NJMA7RHNw2xwUVwu4WhGOqxUwN3K-83rzry83FWyG3Oxzaszh2fY1VOHH-vFUNM-CiJM63PIPG-rHCeZIhYcLgxU7O2TUqY3D1kuhpDxOQJL21lyQL74LmgsCIJ9ZOb2zwNpZ9SlXFxJFST6aQiq26OCeU~Ddou6nqXGYBRCyzSjUfMrNtRSoIBi9Qh4~N0jDQd6fLV-KPQ__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJKNBJ4MJBJNC6NLQ.
Yukawa, Satoshi; Kikuchi, Macoto; Tatara, Gen; Matsukawa, Hiroshi (1997). "Quantum Ratchets". Journal of the Physical Society of Japan66 (10): 2953–2956. doi:10.1143/JPSJ.66.2953. ISSN 0031-9015. Bibcode: 1997JPSJ...66.2953Y.
Yukawa, Satoshi (2000). "A Quantum Analogue of the Jarzynski Equality". Journal of the Physical Society of Japan69 (8): 2367–2370. doi:10.1143/JPSJ.69.2367. ISSN 0031-9015. Bibcode: 2000JPSJ...69.2367Y.
Press
Cartlidge, Edwin (21 October 2015). "Scientists build heat engine from a single atom". Archived from the original on 1 February 2017. https://archive.today/20170201155641/http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/10/scientists-build-heat-engine-single-atom.
Chalmers, Matthew (19 July 2002). "Second law of thermodynamics "broken"". Archived from the original on 31 January 2017. https://archive.today/20170131095800/https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn2572-second-law-of-thermodynamics-broken/.
Gerstner, Ed (23 July 2002). "Second law broken: Small-scale energy fluctuations could limit minaturization". Nature. doi:10.1038/news020722-2. Archived from the original on 29 January 2013. https://archive.today/20130129135021/http://www.nature.com/news/1998/020722/full/news020722-2.html.
"Prototype of single ion heat engine created". 3 February 2014. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/02/140203101031.htm.
Whitehouse, David (18 July 2002). "Beads of doubt". Archived from the original on 2 September 2013. https://archive.today/20130902141858/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/2135779.stm.
Zyga, Lisa (27 January 2014). "Nanoscale heat engine exceeds standard efficiency limit". Archived from the original on 4 April 2015. https://archive.today/20150404110141/http://phys.org/news/2014-01-nanoscale-standard-efficiency-limit.html.
v
t
e
Branches of physics
Divisions
Theoretical
Phenomenology
Computational
Experimental
Applied
Classical
Classical mechanics
Continuum
Solid
Fluid
Acoustics
Electrodynamics
Electrostatics
Magnetostatics
Plasma physics
Accelerator physics
Statistical mechanics
Thermodynamics
Condensed matter
Materials
Mesoscopic
Polymers
Soft
Solid-state
Modern
Quantum mechanics
Quantum electrodynamics
Quantum field theory
Quantum gravity
Quantum information
Relativity
General
Special
Particle physics
Astroparticle
Nuclear
Quantum chromodynamics
Atomic, molecular and optical physics
Atomic physics
Molecular physics
Optics
Photonics
Quantum optics
Cosmology
Astrophysics
Nuclear
Celestial mechanics
Solar
Heliophysics
Space physics
Interdisciplinary
Biophysics
Agrophysics
Medical
Neurophysics
Engineering
Geophysics
Atmospheric
Cloud
Materials science
Mathematical physics
Physical chemistry
Chemical physics
Physical oceanography
Quantum computing
Social physics
Econophysics
See also
History of physics
Nobel Prize in Physics
Timeline of physics discoveries
Theory of everything
v
t
e
Statistical mechanics
Theory
Principle of maximum entropy
ergodic theory
Statistical thermodynamics
Ensembles
partition functions
equations of state
thermodynamic potential:
U
H
F
G
Maxwell relations
Models
Ferromagnetism models
Ising
Potts
Heisenberg
percolation
Particles with force field
depletion force
Lennard-Jones potential
Mathematical approaches
Boltzmann equation
H-theorem
Vlasov equation
BBGKY hierarchy
stochastic process
mean field theory and conformal field theory
Critical phenomena
Phase transition
Critical exponents
correlation length
size scaling
Entropy
Boltzmann
Shannon
Tsallis
Rényi
von Neumann
Applications
Statistical field theory
elementary particle
superfluidity
condensed matter physics
complex system
chaos
information theory
Boltzmann machine
v
t
e
Stochastic processes
Discrete time
Bernoulli process
Branching process
Chinese restaurant process
Galton–Watson process
Independent and identically distributed random variables
Markov chain
Moran process
Random walk
Loop-erased
Self-avoiding
Biased
Maximal entropy
Continuous time
Bessel process
Birth–death process
Brownian motion
Bridge
Excursion
Fractional
Geometric
Meander
Cauchy process
Contact process
Continuous-time random walk
Cox process
Diffusion process
Empirical process
Feller process
Fleming–Viot process
Gamma process
Geometric process
Hunt process
Interacting particle systems
Itô diffusion
Itô process
Jump diffusion
Jump process
Lévy process
Local time
Markov additive process
McKean–Vlasov process
Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process
Poisson process
Compound
Non-homogeneous
Point process
Schramm–Loewner evolution
Semimartingale
Sigma-martingale
Stable process
Superprocess
Telegraph process
Variance gamma process
Wiener process
Wiener sausage
Both
Branching process
Galves–Löcherbach model
Gaussian process
Hidden Markov model (HMM)
Markov process
Martingale
Differences
Local
Sub-
Super-
Random dynamical system
Regenerative process
Renewal process
Stochastic chains with memory of variable length
White noise
Fields and other
Dirichlet process
Gaussian random field
Gibbs measure
Hopfield model
Ising model
Potts model
Boolean network
Markov random field
Percolation
Pitman–Yor process
Point process
Cox
Poisson
Random field
Random graph
Time series models
Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (ARCH) model
Autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model
Autoregressive (AR) model
Autoregressive–moving-average (ARMA) model
Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH) model
Moving-average (MA) model
Financial models
Black–Derman–Toy
Black–Karasinski
Black–Scholes
Chen
Constant elasticity of variance (CEV)
Cox–Ingersoll–Ross (CIR)
Garman–Kohlhagen
Heath–Jarrow–Morton (HJM)
Heston
Ho–Lee
Hull–White
LIBOR market
Rendleman–Bartter
SABR volatility
Vašíček
Wilkie
Actuarial models
Bühlmann
Cramér–Lundberg
Risk process
Sparre–Anderson
Queueing models
Bulk
Fluid
Generalized queueing network
M/G/1
M/M/1
M/M/c
Properties
Càdlàg paths
Continuous
Continuous paths
Ergodic
Exchangeable
Feller-continuous
Gauss–Markov
Markov
Mixing
Piecewise deterministic
Predictable
Progressively measurable
Self-similar
Stationary
Time-reversible
Limit theorems
Central limit theorem
Donsker's theorem
Doob's martingale convergence theorems
Ergodic theorem
Fisher–Tippett–Gnedenko theorem
Large deviation principle
Law of large numbers (weak/strong)
Law of the iterated logarithm
Maximal ergodic theorem
Sanov's theorem
Inequalities
Burkholder–Davis–Gundy
Doob's martingale
Kunita–Watanabe
Tools
Cameron–Martin formula
Convergence of random variables
Doléans-Dade exponential
Doob decomposition theorem
Doob–Meyer decomposition theorem
Doob's optional stopping theorem
Dynkin's formula
Feynman–Kac formula
Filtration
Girsanov theorem
Infinitesimal generator
Itô integral
Itô's lemma
Karhunen–Loève_theorem
Kolmogorov continuity theorem
Kolmogorov extension theorem
Lévy–Prokhorov metric
Malliavin calculus
Martingale representation theorem
Optional stopping theorem
Prokhorov's theorem
Quadratic variation
Reflection principle
Skorokhod integral
Skorokhod's representation theorem
Skorokhod space
Snell envelope
Stochastic differential equation
Tanaka
Stopping time
Stratonovich integral
Uniform integrability
Usual hypotheses
Wiener space
Classical
Abstract
Disciplines
Actuarial mathematics
Econometrics
Ergodic theory
Extreme value theory (EVT)
Large deviations theory
Mathematical finance
Mathematical statistics
Probability theory
Queueing theory
Renewal theory
Ruin theory
Statistics
System on Chip design
Stochastic analysis
Time series analysis
Machine learning
List of topics
Category
0.00
(0 votes)
Original source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stochastic thermodynamics. Read more