From Ballotpedia
This article does not contain the most recently published data on this subject. If you would like to help our coverage grow, consider donating to Ballotpedia.
| Education policy in the U.S. |
| Public education in the U.S. |
| School choice in the U.S. |
| Charter schools in the U.S. |
| Higher education in the U.S. |
| Glossary of education terms |
| Education statistics |
The California public school system (prekindergarten through grade 12) operates within districts governed by locally elected school boards and superintendents. In 2012 California had 6,287,834 students enrolled in a total of 10,170 schools in 1,187 school districts. There were 268,689 teachers in the public schools, or roughly one teacher for every 23 students, compared to the national average of 1:16. There was roughly one administrator for every 389 students, compared to the national average of one administrator for every 295 students. On average California spent $9,139.00 per pupil in 2011, which ranked it 36th highest in the nation. The state's high school graduation rate was 78 percent in 2012.[1][2]
The mission statement of the California Department of Education reads:[3]
| “ | California will provide a world-class education for all students, from early childhood to adulthood. The Department of Education serves our state by innovating and collaborating with educators, schools, parents, and community partners. Together, as a team, we prepare students to live, work, and thrive in a highly connected world.[4] | ” |
The Superintendent of Public Instruction is elected to four-year terms in nonpartisan elections.[5] The office is currently held by Tom Torlakson.[3]
The State Board of Education determines K-12 policy for the state. The Superintendent of Public Instruction serves as the board's executive officer and secretary. The board is composed of 10 members who serve four-year terms and one student member who serves a one-year term. All members are appointed by the Governor.[6]
The following chart shows how California compared to three neighboring states in the 2011-2012 school year with respect to number of students, schools, the number of teachers per pupil, and the number of administrators per pupil. Further comparisons between these states with respect to performance and financial information are given in other sections of this page.
| Regional comparison, 2011-2012 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| State | Schools | Districts | Students | Teachers | Teacher/pupil ratio | Administrator/pupil ratio | Per pupil spending |
| California | 10,170 | 1,187 | 6,287,834 | 268,689 | 1:23.4 | 1:389.4 | $9,139 |
| Arizona | 2,252 | 662 | 1,080,319 | 50,800 | 1:21.3 | 1:419.5 | $7,666 |
| Nevada | 649 | 18 | 439,634 | 21,132 | 1:20.8 | 1:449.7 | $8,527 |
| Oregon | 1,261 | 221 | 568,208 | 26,791 | 1:21.2 | 1:364.8 | $9,682 |
| United States | 98,328 | 17,992 | 49,521,669 | 3,103,263 | 1:16 | 1:295.2 | $10,994 |
| Sources: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Common Core of Data (CCD), "State Nonfiscal Public Elementary/Secondary Education Survey", 2011-12 v.1a. National Center for Education Statistics, "Table 2. Number of operating public schools and districts, state enrollment, teacher and pupil/teacher ratio by state: School year 2011–12" | |||||||
The following table displays the ethnic distribution of students in California as reported in the Common Core of Data for 2011-2012.[7]
| Demographic information for California's K-12 public school system | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ethnicity | Students | State percentage | United States percentage** | |
| American Indian | 42,486 | 0.68% | 1.10% | |
| Asian | 693,313 | 11.16% | 4.68% | |
| African American | 404,412 | 6.51% | 15.68% | |
| Hawaiian Nat./Pacific Isl. | 35,232 | 0.57% | 0.42% | |
| Hispanic | 3,239,296 | 52.13% | 24.37% | |
| White | 1,617,931 | 26.04% | 51.21% | |
| Two or more | 181,534 | 2.92% | 2.54% | |
| **Note: This is the percentage of all students in the United States that are reported to be of this ethnicity. | ||||
A plurality of students in California attended city schools during the 2011-2012 school year. More than 82 percent of the state's students attended city or suburban schools, compared to the approximately 18 percent who attended rural or town schools.
| Student distribution by region type, 2011-2012 (as percents) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| State | City schools | Suburban schools | Town schools | Rural schools | |||
| California | 43.4% | 39.3% | 6.1% | 11.3% | |||
| Arizona | 48.5% | 16.3% | 10% | 25.2% | |||
| Nevada | 38.5% | 32% | 6.6% | 22.9% | |||
| Oregon | 32.6% | 23.3% | 26.3% | 17.8% | |||
| U.S. average | 28.9% | 34% | 11.6% | 25.4% | |||
| Source: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Common Core of Data (CCD) | |||||||
| Education terms |
|---|
| For more information on education policy terms, see this article. |
School board elections portal
Glossary of education terms School choice on the ballot Education on the ballot |
The National Center for Education Statistics provides state-by-state data on student achievement levels in mathematics and reading in the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). Compared to three neighboring states (Arizona, Nevada, and Oregon), California's fourth grade students fared the worst in mathematics, with only 33 percent scoring at or above proficient during the 2012-2013 school year.[8]
| Percent of students scoring at or above proficient, 2012-2013 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Math - Grade 4 | Math - Grade 8 | Reading - Grade 4 | Reading - Grade 8 | |
| California | 33% | 28% | 27% | 29% |
| Arizona | 40% | 31% | 28% | 28% |
| Nevada | 34% | 28% | 27% | 30% |
| Oregon | 40% | 34% | 33% | 37% |
| U.S. average | 41% | 34% | 34% | 34% |
| Source: United States Department of Education, ED Data Express, "State Tables," accessed May 13, 2014 | ||||
The following table shows the graduation rates and average composite ACT and SAT scores for California and surrounding states during the 2012-2013 school year. All statements made in this section refer to that school year.[8][9][10]
| Comparison table for graduation rates and test scores* | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| State | Graduation rate, 2012 | Average ACT composite, 2012 | Average SAT composite, 2013 | ||||
| Percent | Quintile ranking** | Score | Participation rate | Score | Participation rate | ||
| California | 78% | Fourth | 22.1 | 25% | 1,505 | 57% | |
| Arizona | 76% | Fourth | 19.7 | 35% | 1,551 | 35% | |
| Nevada | 63% | Fifth | 21.3 | 34% | 1,454 | 48% | |
| Oregon | 68% | Fifth | 21.4 | 38% | 1,539 | 49% | |
| U.S. average | 80% | 21.1 | 1,498 | ||||
| *Regulatory Adjusted Cohort Rate (except for Idaho, Kentucky, Oklahoma, which did not report “Regulatory Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate,” but instead used their own method of calculation). **Graduation rates for states in the first quintile ranked in the top 20 percent nationally. Similarly, graduation rates for states in the fifth quintile ranked in the bottom 20 percent nationally. Source: United States Department of Education, ED Data Express | |||||||
The high school event dropout rate indicates the proportion of students who were enrolled at some time during the school year and were expected to be enrolled in grades 9–12 in the following school year but were not enrolled by October 1 of the following school year. Students who have graduated, transferred to another school, died, moved to another country, or who are out of school due to illness are not considered dropouts. The average public high school event dropout rate for the United States remained constant at 3.3 percent for both school year 2010–2011 and school year 2011–2012. The event dropout rate for California was higher than the national average at 4.2 percent in the 2010-2011 school year, and 4 percent in the 2011-2012 school year.[11]
As of June 2015, school choice options in California included: charter schools, online learning programs and open enrollment policies. In addition, about 9 percent of school-age children in the state attended private schools in the 2011-12 academic year, and an estimated 2.67 percent were homeschooled in 2012-13.
According to the National Association of State Budget Officers (NASBO), California spent approximately 19.9 percent of its fiscal year 2012 budget on elementary and secondary education. As a share of the budget, this was down 4.30 percentage points, or 17.8 percent, from fiscal year 2008, when the state spent 24.2 percent of its budget on elementary and secondary education.[12][13][14][15][16]
| Comparison of financial figures for school systems | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| State | Percent of budget (2012) | Per pupil spending (2011) | Revenue sources (2011) | ||||
| Percent federal funds | Percent state funds | Percent local funds | |||||
| California | 19.9% | $9,139 | 14.56% | 55.06% | 30.37% | ||
| Arizona | 19% | $7,666 | 14.69% | 41.22% | 44.09% | ||
| Nevada | 23.6% | $8,527 | 10.68% | 33.09% | 56.24% | ||
| Oregon | 14% | $9,682 | 14% | 46.07% | 39.93% | ||
| Sources: NASBO, "State Expenditure Report," Table 8: Elementary and Secondary Education Expenditures As a Percent of Total Expenditures U.S. Census Bureau, "Public Education Finances: 2011,Governments Division Reports," issued May 2013 | |||||||
According to the National Center for Education Statistics, public school system revenues in California totaled approximately $68.6 billion in fiscal year 2011. The table and chart below present further detail, including revenue sources, for California and surrounding states.[17]
| Revenues by source, fiscal year 2011 (amounts in thousands) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Federal revenue | State revenue | Local revenue | Total revenue | |
| California | $9,995,705 | $37,793,351 | $20,848,699 | $68,637,755 |
| Arizona | $1,367,644 | $3,839,130 | $4,105,899 | $9,312,673 |
| Nevada | $447,888 | $1,388,154 | $2,359,519 | $4,195,561 |
| Oregon | $848,637 | $2,792,762 | $2,420,619 | $6,062,018 |
| U.S. total | $74,943,767 | $267,762,416 | $264,550,594 | $607,256,777 |
| Source: National Center for Education Statistics | ||||
| Public school revenues by source, fiscal year 2011 (as percents) |
|---|
According to the National Center for Education Statistics, public school system expenditures in California totaled approximately $66.9 billion in fiscal year 2011. The table and chart below present further detail, including expenditure types, for California and surrounding states.[17]
| Expenditures by type, fiscal year 2011 (amounts in thousands) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| General expenditures** | Capital outlay | Other*** | Total expenditures | |
| California | $56,784,812 | $6,535,512 | $3,579,908 | $66,900,232 |
| Arizona | $8,157,006 | $796,052 | $634,413 | $9,587,471 |
| Nevada | $3,712,313 | $324,287 | $270,077 | $4,306,677 |
| Oregon | $5,418,357 | $461,979 | $325,080 | $6,205,416 |
| U.S. total | $520,577,893 | $52,984,139 | $29,581,293 | $603,143,325 |
| **Funds spent operating local public schools and local education agencies, including such expenses as salaries for school personnel, student transportation, school books and materials, and energy costs, but excluding capital outlay, interest on school debt, payments to private schools, and payments to public charter schools. ***Includes payments to state and local governments, payments to private schools, interest on school system indebtedness, and nonelementary-secondary expenditures, such as adult education and community services expenditures. Source: National Center for Education Statistics | ||||
| Public school expenditures, fiscal year 2011 (as percents) |
|---|
According to the National Center for Education Statistics, the average national salary for classroom teachers in public elementary and secondary schools declined by 1.3 percent from the 1999-2000 school year to the 2012-2013 school year. During the same period in California, the average salary increased by 6.4 percent.[19]
| Estimated average salaries for teachers (in constant dollars**) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1999-2000 | 2009-2010 | 2011-2012 | 2012-2013 | Percent difference | |
| California | $65,159 | $72,803 | $69,672 | $69,324 | 6.4% |
| Arizona | $50,430 | $50,119 | $49,501 | $49,885 | -1.1% |
| Nevada | $53,830 | $54,999 | $55,467 | $55,957 | 4% |
| Oregon | $57,856 | $58,948 | $58,302 | $58,758 | 1.6% |
| U.S. average | $57,133 | $58,925 | $56,340 | $56,383 | -1.3% |
| **"Constant dollars based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI), prepared by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, adjusted to a school-year basis. The CPI does not account for differences in inflation rates from state to state." | |||||
In 2012 the Fordham Institute and Education Reform Now assessed the power and influence of state teacher unions in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Their rankings were based on 37 different variables in five broad areas, including: resources and membership, involvement in politics, scope of bargaining, state policies and perceived influence. California ranked sixth overall, or "strongest," which was in the first of five tiers.[20]
In July 2009, United States Education Secretary Arne Duncan challenged members of the National Education Association to stop resisting linking teacher pay with student performance. "It's not enough to focus only on issues like job security, tenure, compensation, and evaluation," he said. "You must become full partners and leaders in education reform. You must be willing to change."[21]
In June 2009, the California Teachers Association announced that they could not support Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger's plan for digital textbooks in 2010. "It's a nice idea, but it's not going to work," said David Sanchez, president of the California Teachers Association. "Where are you going to get a computer for everybody? How many of these kids actually have computers at home?" Instead, Sanchez said that he would like to see the governor's proposal for increasing funds for education. The union suggested increasing tax revenues to directly support schools.
Other California unions include the California Federation of Teachers.
Taxpayer-funded lobbyists for state public schools include:
In 2008, the governor launched "School Finder," a website that provides access to data reported by California’s schools to the California Department of Education. Data available on the website covers state elementary through high schools and includes traditional, alternative, adult education and charter schools. “This vital information, compiled in one easy-to-navigate site, will increase school accountability and transparency, and put power back into the hands of California parents. The facts of achievement for every school in California are now easily accessible – not buried in bureaucracy,” said Schwarzenegger about the launch.[22]
State Budget Solutions examined national trends in education from 2009 to 2011, including state-by-state analysis of education spending, graduation rates and average ACT scores. The study showed that the states that spent the most did not have the highest average ACT test scores, nor did they have the highest average graduation rates. A summary of the study is available here. The full report can be accessed here.
| ||||||||||||||||
| |||||
State of California Sacramento (capital) | |
|---|---|
| Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2021 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
| Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |
Categories: [Archived education policy information by state] [California]
ZWI signed: